H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Novak Djokovic vs Thomaz Bellucci H2H: 6-0

Novak Djokovic holds a 6–0 lead over Thomaz Bellucci in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Novak Djokovic leads 4–0 on clay and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Novak Djokovic won the 2016 Rome Masters fourth round 0-6 6-3 6-2.

Serbia Age 39 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
6 0
6 main draw meetings
BRA Age 38 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 13, 2016* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R16 Clay Novak Djokovic #1 0-6 6-3 6-2 Thomaz Bellucci #37 Match data
Nov 5, 2015* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Novak Djokovic #1 7-5 6-3 Thomaz Bellucci #40 Match data
Aug 13, 2015* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Novak Djokovic #1 6-3 7-6(4) Thomaz Bellucci #33 Match data
May 15, 2015* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R16 Clay Novak Djokovic #1 5-7 6-2 6-3 Thomaz Bellucci #68 Match data
May 7, 2011* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 SF Clay Novak Djokovic #2 4-6 6-4 6-1 Thomaz Bellucci #36 Match data
Apr 30, 2010* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R16 Clay Novak Djokovic #2 6-4 6-4 Thomaz Bellucci #28 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Novak Djokovic #7 #1 16,950 2,593 1,122 223 83.4% 24 40 7 14 15 100
Thomaz Bellucci #1,303 #21 1,732 1,937 179 201 47.1% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Novak Djokovic Thomaz Bellucci
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2004 1–3 25.0% #186 1,490 0 0
18 2005 9–9 50.0% #78 1,732 0 0
19 2006 35–17 67.3% #16 1,884 0 2
20 2007 65–19 77.4% #3 2,067 0 7 2008 3–11 21.4% #85 1,554 0 0
21 2008 58–15 79.5% #3 2,120 1 11 2009 18–17 51.4% #36 1,781 0 1
22 2009 78–17 82.1% #3 2,267 1 16 2010 32–24 57.1% #31 1,795 0 2
23 2010 56–18 75.7% #3 2,166 1 18 2011 23–24 48.9% #37 1,710 0 2
24 2011 72–6 92.3% #1 2,357 4 28 2012 24–21 53.3% #33 1,828 0 3
25 2012 71–10 87.7% #1 2,429 5 34 2013 7–16 30.4% #125 1,676 0 3
26 2013 67–9 88.2% #2 2,469 6 41 2014 16–13 55.2% #65 1,818 0 3
27 2014 65–8 89.0% #1 2,463 7 48 2015 29–27 51.8% #37 1,856 0 4
28 2015 82–6 93.2% #1 2,554 10 59 2016 14–21 40.0% #61 1,758 0 4
29 2016 64–8 88.9% #2 2,450 12 66 2017 12–20 37.5% #113 1,693 0 4
30 2017 31–8 79.5% #12 2,293 12 68 2018 1–5 16.7% #225 1,654 0 4
31 2018 53–12 81.5% #1 2,332 14 72
32 2019 55–11 83.3% #2 2,264 16 77
33 2020 35–5 87.5% #1 2,275 17 81 2021 0–1 0.0% #449 1,610 0 4
34 2021 46–5 90.2% #1 2,372 20 86
35 2022 42–6 87.5% #5 2,368 21 91 2023 0–1 0.0% #1303 1,598 0 4
36 2023 54–6 90.0% #1 2,405 24 98
37 2024 29–9 76.3% #7 2,226 24 98
38 2025 39–11 78.0% #4 2,174 24 100
39 2026 15–5 75.0% #7 2,155 24 100