H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Novak Djokovic vs Tommy Haas H2H: 6-3

Novak Djokovic holds a 6–3 lead over Tommy Haas in their ATP head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, Novak Djokovic leads 3–1 on hard courts, while Tommy Haas leads 2–1 on grass. Most recently, Novak Djokovic won the 2013 Wimbledon fourth round 6-1 6-4 7-6(4).

Serbia Age 39 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
6 3
9 main draw meetings
GER Age 48 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 2, 2013* Wimbledon Grand Slam R16 Grass Novak Djokovic #4 6-1 6-4 7-6(4) Tommy Haas #13 Match data
Jun 6, 2013* Roland Garros Grand Slam QF Clay Novak Djokovic #1 6-3 7-6(5) 7-5 Tommy Haas #14 Match data
Mar 27, 2013* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Tommy Haas #18 6-2 6-4 Novak Djokovic #1 Match data
Oct 13, 2012* Shanghai Masters Masters 1000 QF Hard Novak Djokovic #2 6-3 6-3 Tommy Haas #21 Match data
Aug 11, 2012* Canada Masters Masters 1000 QF Hard Novak Djokovic #2 6-3 3-6 6-3 Tommy Haas #25 Match data
Jul 2, 2009* Wimbledon Grand Slam QF Grass Tommy Haas #34 7-5 7-6(6) 4-6 6-3 Novak Djokovic #4 Match data
Jun 14, 2009* Halle ATP 500 F Grass Tommy Haas #41 6-3 6-7(4) 6-1 Novak Djokovic #4 Match data
Mar 17, 2009* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Novak Djokovic #3 6-2 7-6(1) Tommy Haas #64 Match data
Jun 4, 2006* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Novak Djokovic #63 7-5 6-1 7-6(4) Tommy Haas #25 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Novak Djokovic #7 #1 16,950 2,593 1,122 223 83.4% 24 40 7 14 15 100
Tommy Haas #616 #2 3,030 2,103 533 330 61.8% 0 1 0 3 11 15

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Novak Djokovic Tommy Haas
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2004 1–3 25.0% #186 1,490 0 0
18 2005 9–9 50.0% #78 1,732 0 0 1996 4–3 57.1% #170 1,587 0 0
19 2006 35–17 67.3% #16 1,884 0 2 1997 22–17 56.4% #45 1,721 0 0
20 2007 65–19 77.4% #3 2,067 0 7 1998 34–26 56.7% #34 1,840 0 0
21 2008 58–15 79.5% #3 2,120 1 11 1999 45–23 66.2% #11 1,859 0 1
22 2009 78–17 82.1% #3 2,267 1 16 2000 27–20 57.4% #23 1,777 0 1
23 2010 56–18 75.7% #3 2,166 1 18 2001 53–21 71.6% #8 2,009 0 5
24 2011 72–6 92.3% #1 2,357 4 28 2002 43–22 66.2% #11 1,849 0 5
25 2012 71–10 87.7% #1 2,429 5 34
26 2013 67–9 88.2% #2 2,469 6 41 2004 35–18 66.0% #17 1,909 0 7
27 2014 65–8 89.0% #1 2,463 7 48 2005 28–21 57.1% #45 1,766 0 7
28 2015 82–6 93.2% #1 2,554 10 59 2006 48–19 71.6% #11 1,893 0 10
29 2016 64–8 88.9% #2 2,450 12 66 2007 36–17 67.9% #12 1,892 0 11
30 2017 31–8 79.5% #12 2,293 12 68 2008 18–15 54.5% #82 1,855 0 11
31 2018 53–12 81.5% #1 2,332 14 72 2009 31–18 63.3% #18 1,913 0 12
32 2019 55–11 83.3% #2 2,264 16 77 2010 3–4 42.9% #372 1,844 0 12
33 2020 35–5 87.5% #1 2,275 17 81 2011 7–12 36.8% #205 1,762 0 12
34 2021 46–5 90.2% #1 2,372 20 86 2012 31–17 64.6% #21 1,966 0 13
35 2022 42–6 87.5% #5 2,368 21 91 2013 46–23 66.7% #12 2,011 0 15
36 2023 54–6 90.0% #1 2,405 24 98 2014 14–11 56.0% #77 1,904 0 15
37 2024 29–9 76.3% #7 2,226 24 98 2015 2–9 18.2% #470 1,784 0 15
38 2025 39–11 78.0% #4 2,174 24 100
39 2026 15–5 75.0% #7 2,155 24 100 2017 6–14 30.0% #252 1,686 0 15