H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Novak Djokovic vs Tommy Haas H2H: 6-3
Novak Djokovic holds a 6–3 lead over Tommy Haas in their ATP head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, Novak Djokovic leads 3–1 on hard courts, while Tommy Haas leads 2–1 on grass. Most recently, Novak Djokovic won the 2013 Wimbledon fourth round 6-1 6-4 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Serbia
Age 39
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
6
–
3
9 main draw meetings
GER
Age 48
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 2, 2013* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R16 | Grass | Novak Djokovic | 6-1 6-4 7-6(4) | Tommy Haas | Match data |
| Jun 6, 2013* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | QF | Clay | Novak Djokovic | 6-3 7-6(5) 7-5 | Tommy Haas | Match data |
| Mar 27, 2013* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Tommy Haas | 6-2 6-4 | Novak Djokovic | Match data |
| Oct 13, 2012* | Shanghai Masters | Masters 1000 | QF | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 6-3 6-3 | Tommy Haas | Match data |
| Aug 11, 2012* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | QF | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 6-3 3-6 6-3 | Tommy Haas | Match data |
| Jul 2, 2009* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | QF | Grass | Tommy Haas | 7-5 7-6(6) 4-6 6-3 | Novak Djokovic | Match data |
| Jun 14, 2009* | Halle | ATP 500 | F | Grass | Tommy Haas | 6-3 6-7(4) 6-1 | Novak Djokovic | Match data |
| Mar 17, 2009* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 6-2 7-6(1) | Tommy Haas | Match data |
| Jun 4, 2006* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Novak Djokovic | 7-5 6-1 7-6(4) | Tommy Haas | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Novak Djokovic | #7 | #1 | 16,950 | 2,593 | 1,122 | 223 | 83.4% | 24 | 40 | 7 | 14 | 15 | 100 |
| Tommy Haas | #616 | #2 | 3,030 | 2,103 | 533 | 330 | 61.8% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 15 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Novak Djokovic | Tommy Haas | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2004 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #186 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2005 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #78 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #170 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2006 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #16 | 1,884 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #45 | 1,721 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2007 | 65–19 | 77.4% | #3 | 2,067 | 0 | 7 | 1998 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #34 | 1,840 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2008 | 58–15 | 79.5% | #3 | 2,120 | 1 | 11 | 1999 | 45–23 | 66.2% | #11 | 1,859 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2009 | 78–17 | 82.1% | #3 | 2,267 | 1 | 16 | 2000 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #23 | 1,777 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2010 | 56–18 | 75.7% | #3 | 2,166 | 1 | 18 | 2001 | 53–21 | 71.6% | #8 | 2,009 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 2011 | 72–6 | 92.3% | #1 | 2,357 | 4 | 28 | 2002 | 43–22 | 66.2% | #11 | 1,849 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 2012 | 71–10 | 87.7% | #1 | 2,429 | 5 | 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2013 | 67–9 | 88.2% | #2 | 2,469 | 6 | 41 | 2004 | 35–18 | 66.0% | #17 | 1,909 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | 2014 | 65–8 | 89.0% | #1 | 2,463 | 7 | 48 | 2005 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #45 | 1,766 | 0 | 7 |
| 28 | 2015 | 82–6 | 93.2% | #1 | 2,554 | 10 | 59 | 2006 | 48–19 | 71.6% | #11 | 1,893 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | 2016 | 64–8 | 88.9% | #2 | 2,450 | 12 | 66 | 2007 | 36–17 | 67.9% | #12 | 1,892 | 0 | 11 |
| 30 | 2017 | 31–8 | 79.5% | #12 | 2,293 | 12 | 68 | 2008 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #82 | 1,855 | 0 | 11 |
| 31 | 2018 | 53–12 | 81.5% | #1 | 2,332 | 14 | 72 | 2009 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #18 | 1,913 | 0 | 12 |
| 32 | 2019 | 55–11 | 83.3% | #2 | 2,264 | 16 | 77 | 2010 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #372 | 1,844 | 0 | 12 |
| 33 | 2020 | 35–5 | 87.5% | #1 | 2,275 | 17 | 81 | 2011 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #205 | 1,762 | 0 | 12 |
| 34 | 2021 | 46–5 | 90.2% | #1 | 2,372 | 20 | 86 | 2012 | 31–17 | 64.6% | #21 | 1,966 | 0 | 13 |
| 35 | 2022 | 42–6 | 87.5% | #5 | 2,368 | 21 | 91 | 2013 | 46–23 | 66.7% | #12 | 2,011 | 0 | 15 |
| 36 | 2023 | 54–6 | 90.0% | #1 | 2,405 | 24 | 98 | 2014 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #77 | 1,904 | 0 | 15 |
| 37 | 2024 | 29–9 | 76.3% | #7 | 2,226 | 24 | 98 | 2015 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #470 | 1,784 | 0 | 15 |
| 38 | 2025 | 39–11 | 78.0% | #4 | 2,174 | 24 | 100 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 2026 | 15–5 | 75.0% | #7 | 2,155 | 24 | 100 | 2017 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #252 | 1,686 | 0 | 15 |