H2H data updated: 2026-07-14 14:15 UTC
O. Ogorodov vs A. Cherkasov H2H: 1-0
O. Ogorodov holds a 1–0 lead over A. Cherkasov in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, O. Ogorodov leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, O. Ogorodov won the 1997 Shanghai third round 7-6(5) 1-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
UZB
Age 53
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 56
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 30, 1997* | Shanghai | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | O. Ogorodov | 7-6(5) 1-6 7-5 | A. Cherkasov | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| O. Ogorodov | #1,528 | #101 | 469 | 1,563 | 19 | 45 | 29.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| A. Cherkasov | #1,174 | #13 | 1,320 | 1,897 | 170 | 198 | 46.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | O. Ogorodov | A. Cherkasov | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #236 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #82 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #21 | 1,877 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #21 | 1,815 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #264 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 29–29 | 50.0% | #32 | 1,711 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1995 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #112 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 34–31 | 52.3% | #37 | 1,753 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1996 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #140 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 8–27 | 22.9% | #172 | 1,554 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1997 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #142 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #184 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1998 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #225 | 1,429 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #133 | 1,463 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1999 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #132 | 1,410 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #164 | 1,485 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #230 | 1,402 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #164 | 1,462 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #148 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #217 | 1,483 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2002 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #166 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #198 | 1,452 | 0 | 2 |