H2H data updated: 2026-10-27 00:00 UTC

Olivier Patience vs John Van Lottum H2H: 0-1

John Van Lottum holds a 1–0 lead over Olivier Patience in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, John Van Lottum leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, John Van Lottum won the 2003 Chennai round of 32 6-2 7-6(4).

FRA Age 46 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
NED Age 50 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
John Van Lottum 6-2 7-6(4) Olivier Patience #222 Match data Jan 2, 2003* R32 Chennai ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Olivier Patience — #87 632 1,665 26 53 32.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0
John Van Lottum — — — 1,719 — — — 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Olivier Patience John Van Lottum
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
22 2002 0–1 0.0% #222 1,455 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 2003 0–2 0.0% #165 1,444 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 2004 12–15 44.4% #119 1,584 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 2005 2–5 28.6% #151 1,573 0 0 — — — — — — —
26 2006 3–8 27.3% #100 1,508 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 2007 6–8 42.9% #108 1,553 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 2008 3–10 23.1% #141 1,527 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 2009 0–2 0.0% #343 1,472 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 2010 0–2 0.0% #195 1,521 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Olivier Patience John Van Lottum
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
22 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 3 6 9 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 2 5 7 28.6%
23 2003 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1999 17 13 30 56.7% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
24 2004 3 4 7 42.9% 7 9 16 43.8% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2000 2 8 10 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2005 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 2001 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
26 2006 0 3 3 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2002 1 3 4 25.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — —
27 2007 0 2 2 0.0% 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2003 3 6 9 33.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
28 2008 0 1 1 0.0% 2 8 10 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2004 2 6 8 25.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
29 2009 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2010 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2006 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 4 15 19 21.1% 19 34 53 35.8% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — 30 46 76 39.5% 13 27 40 32.5% 13 15 28 46.4% 4 7 11 36.4%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 77/79 of Olivier Patience's and 41/41 of John Van Lottum's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Olivier Patience John Van Lottum
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
22 2002 1/1 6.0 1.0 63.6% 69.7% 56.9% 42.9% 50.0% 65.0% 31.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2003 2/2 2.5 2.5 59.9% 67.2% 49.1% 51.9% 13.3% 60.1% 33.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2004 27/27 5.0 3.5 61.3% 66.7% 47.6% 52.2% 43.9% 59.3% 36.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2005 7/7 3.6 3.7 56.6% 66.5% 49.2% 48.3% 35.2% 59.0% 37.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2006 11/11 4.6 1.7 67.0% 66.4% 55.1% 55.5% 23.1% 62.6% 34.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2007 12/14 3.8 3.5 63.4% 65.0% 47.9% 62.6% 43.5% 58.7% 37.0% 2003 24/24 3.8 4.0 55.8% 69.8% 48.0% 59.5% 55.2% 60.3% 36.2%
28 2008 13/13 3.5 2.5 65.2% 61.9% 48.0% 47.9% 35.8% 57.1% 31.3% 2004 16/16 3.8 3.1 58.5% 68.9% 49.0% 60.1% 34.7% 60.5% 32.1%
29 2009 2/2 3.0 1.5 54.6% 66.2% 51.2% 44.6% 54.2% 59.3% 25.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2010 2/2 6.0 3.0 57.6% 63.2% 29.7% 37.1% 37.5% 48.8% 34.4% 2006 1/1 4.0 2.0 51.3% 64.1% 54.1% 66.7% 25.0% 59.2% 30.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Olivier Patience John Van Lottum
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
20 2000 1472 101.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1491 106.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.75 — — — -0.35
21 2001 1477 94.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1631 121.6 — — — — -56 -46 +18 64.5% +0.77 1–2 (33%) 3–2 (60%) 100.2 -0.05
22 2002 1455 96.4 -2.14 -1.58 0.896 48.5% — — — 40.0% -0.40 0–1 — — +0.18 1998 1612 120.7 — — — — -50 -79 +129 40.7% -0.59 5–3 (63%) 3–7 (30%) 101.6 +0.05
23 2003 1444 108.3 +0.81 -4.16 0.831 46.3% — — — 20.0% -1.60 0–1 0–1 — -0.03 1999 1662 128.3 — — — — +36 -181 +3 49.1% -0.33 6–6 (50%) 13–3 (81%) 107.6 +1.68
24 2004 1584 122.6 -1.45 -1.88 0.886 48.2% -9 -17 +19 43.4% -0.47 7–4 (64%) 8–5 (62%) 107.9 -0.08 2000 1517 104.0 — — — — +57 — — 18.5% -2.33 0–2 0–2 — +0.38
25 2005 1574 117.2 -0.46 -1.54 0.922 48.8% +22 -12 — 31.6% -0.32 0–1 0–5 (0%) — -0.01 2001 1584 111.2 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.87 0–1 1–1 — -0.48
26 2006 1508 113.4 -1.31 -2.57 0.924 48.6% +22 +47 — 32.1% -0.79 1–3 (25%) 2–5 (29%) 95.7 +0.62 2002 1624 118.0 — — — — -2 -68 — 50.0% -0.30 0–1 1–1 — +0.19
27 2007 1554 118.9 -1.95 -1.17 0.895 48.5% — +75 — 48.8% -0.22 1–4 (20%) 1–3 (25%) 95.9 +0.21 2003 1599 123.9 -1.54 -1.36 0.912 48.4% -3 +14 -27 46.7% -0.27 3–4 (43%) 3–2 (60%) 101.1 +0.37
28 2008 1528 108.6 -4.58 -3.06 0.731 44.6% — +29 — 25.0% -1.87 2–1 (67%) 1–6 (14%) 97.9 +0.16 2004 1512 123.3 -1.67 -2.93 0.813 47.0% +60 +41 +27 37.5% -1.07 0–6 (0%) 3–1 (75%) 96.3 -0.92
29 2009 1473 111.1 +0.58 +0.29 0.632 44.7% — — — 20.0% -1.60 0–1 1–1 — -0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2010 1522 103.7 -2.19 -1.44 0.671 42.9% — — — 16.7% -2.00 — — — +0.08 2006 1511 103.1 +0.34 +3.36 0.751 46.4% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — 0–1 — -0.12
31 2011 1463 100.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1666 116.2 -1.86 -2.02 0.853 47.5% +7 +24 +19 37.3% -0.75 11–16 (41%) 13–26 (33%) 94.0 +1.16 — 1719 126.6 -1.54 -1.86 0.869 47.8% +15 -52 +48 43.0% -0.64 15–25 (38%) 27–20 (57%) 100.9 +0.48

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.