H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Olivier Rochus vs Albert Portas H2H: 0-1
Albert Portas holds a 1–0 lead over Olivier Rochus in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Albert Portas leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Albert Portas won the 2004 Amersfoort third round 6-3 7-6(2).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 45
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 52
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 15, 2004* | Amersfoort | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Albert Portas | 6-3 7-6(2) | Olivier Rochus | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Olivier Rochus | #1,179 | #24 | 1,160 | 1,866 | 220 | 256 | 46.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Albert Portas | #1,082 | #19 | 1,350 | 1,826 | 142 | 198 | 41.8% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Olivier Rochus | Albert Portas | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2000 | 8–4 | 66.7% | #68 | 1,678 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #392 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2001 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #114 | 1,570 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2002 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #64 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #119 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2003 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #48 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #182 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2004 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #66 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #35 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2005 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #27 | 1,818 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #84 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2006 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #36 | 1,804 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #90 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2007 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #48 | 1,712 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #51 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2008 | 11–24 | 31.4% | #122 | 1,645 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 32–28 | 53.3% | #20 | 1,684 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2009 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #57 | 1,751 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 9–23 | 28.1% | #88 | 1,525 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2010 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #113 | 1,676 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #85 | 1,523 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2011 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #67 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 4–16 | 20.0% | #175 | 1,443 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2012 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #90 | 1,648 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #119 | 1,437 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2013 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #201 | 1,673 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #140 | 1,521 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #338 | 1,548 | 0 | 1 |