H2H data updated: 2026-09-04 00:00 UTC

Olivier Rochus vs Diego Nargiso H2H: 1-0

Olivier Rochus holds a 1–0 lead over Diego Nargiso in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Olivier Rochus leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Olivier Rochus won the 2000 Palermo final 7-6(14) 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Olivier Rochus
BEL Age 45 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Diego Nargiso
ITA Age 56 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Olivier Rochus #104 7-6(14) 6-1 Diego Nargiso #249 Match data Oct 1, 2000* F Palermo ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Olivier Rochus #1,179 #24 1,160 1,867 223 259 46.3% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Diego Nargiso #1,400 #67 531 1,702 95 153 38.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Olivier Rochus Diego Nargiso
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1987 1–2 33.3% #191 1,511 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1988 11–13 45.8% #90 1,626 0 0
19 2000 8–4 66.7% #68 1,676 0 1 1989 11–19 36.7% #150 1,593 0 0
20 2001 9–19 32.1% #114 1,570 0 1 1990 4–6 40.0% #147 1,620 0 0
21 2002 17–22 43.6% #64 1,613 0 1 1991 9–14 39.1% #109 1,604 0 0
22 2003 24–28 46.2% #48 1,697 0 1 1992 19–22 46.3% #88 1,597 0 0
23 2004 18–22 45.0% #66 1,701 0 1 1993 8–23 25.8% #120 1,526 0 0
24 2005 35–25 58.3% #27 1,819 0 1 1994 10–18 35.7% #118 1,531 0 0
25 2006 30–20 60.0% #36 1,804 0 2 1995 5–10 33.3% #183 1,530 0 0
26 2007 18–22 45.0% #48 1,715 0 2 1996 2–8 20.0% #280 1,507 0 0
27 2008 13–25 34.2% #122 1,664 0 2 1997 2–3 40.0% #152 1,546 0 0
28 2009 13–9 59.1% #57 1,752 0 2 1998 4–6 40.0% #128 1,563 0 0
29 2010 14–22 38.9% #113 1,676 0 2 1999 1–5 16.7% #220 1,523 0 0
30 2011 13–14 48.1% #67 1,687 0 2 2000 8–4 66.7% #134 1,625 0 0
31 2012 9–23 28.1% #90 1,645 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 2013 2–4 33.3% #201 1,671 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Olivier Rochus Diego Nargiso
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 8 7 15 53.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
19 2000 1 3 4 25.0% 5 0 5 100.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 1989 4 7 11 36.4% 6 7 13 46.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0%
20 2001 0 7 7 0.0% 7 9 16 43.8% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1990 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0%
21 2002 5 9 14 35.7% 7 9 16 43.8% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 1991 1 3 4 25.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
22 2003 12 11 23 52.2% 4 10 14 28.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 4 8 50.0% 1992 10 9 19 52.6% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 5 10 50.0%
23 2004 9 11 20 45.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1993 4 9 13 30.8% 1 7 8 12.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 6 9 33.3%
24 2005 24 13 37 64.9% 3 7 10 30.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1994 1 4 5 20.0% 2 8 10 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0%
25 2006 17 12 29 58.6% 8 4 12 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 1995 1 2 3 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
26 2007 13 12 25 52.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1996 1 2 3 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2008 8 14 22 36.4% 4 8 12 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1997 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
28 2009 6 5 11 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 1998 2 1 3 66.7% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
29 2010 6 12 18 33.3% 4 7 11 36.4% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 1999 — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 2011 4 6 10 40.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — 2000 1 2 3 33.3% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — — — — —
31 2012 7 12 19 36.8% 0 6 6 0.0% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2013 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 114 130 244 46.7% 56 81 137 40.9% 43 38 81 53.1% 10 10 20 50.0% — 33 47 80 41.2% 30 64 94 31.9% 11 15 26 42.3% 21 27 48 43.8%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 461/482 of Olivier Rochus's and 164/181 of Diego Nargiso's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Olivier Rochus Diego Nargiso
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 2000 9/12 2.8 2.3 63.9% 67.8% 50.2% 63.7% 31.7% 61.5% 41.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2001 26/28 2.0 3.1 57.0% 63.5% 49.3% 43.5% 44.1% 57.3% 35.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2002 31/39 1.8 2.9 56.9% 66.3% 50.4% 55.4% 44.8% 59.0% 42.7% 1991 22/23 6.7 5.4 55.7% 74.1% 51.5% 62.6% 37.2% 63.8% 35.6%
22 2003 51/52 1.5 2.5 61.8% 65.2% 50.1% 52.3% 44.3% 59.2% 38.0% 1992 38/41 6.9 4.9 53.9% 75.4% 48.2% 63.7% 48.5% 62.7% 36.2%
23 2004 38/40 1.4 3.1 61.6% 65.8% 53.4% 60.3% 50.4% 61.2% 38.7% 1993 27/31 6.1 4.0 54.0% 72.0% 45.3% 55.7% 36.1% 59.7% 35.7%
24 2005 60/60 2.0 2.7 61.5% 68.4% 54.5% 63.4% 39.9% 63.2% 36.9% 1994 27/28 5.6 5.5 50.7% 69.4% 45.3% 51.7% 46.5% 57.6% 38.8%
25 2006 50/50 1.8 2.7 63.3% 67.8% 55.1% 61.3% 44.1% 63.1% 41.5% 1995 13/15 6.8 6.1 50.9% 72.5% 46.3% 53.1% 49.4% 59.5% 36.3%
26 2007 39/40 1.7 2.5 61.7% 68.0% 50.4% 54.4% 41.6% 61.4% 36.8% 1996 9/10 5.1 7.7 54.5% 68.2% 39.5% 61.9% 36.7% 54.8% 36.1%
27 2008 35/38 1.7 2.4 61.5% 64.4% 50.4% 61.9% 42.3% 59.0% 36.2% 1997 4/5 4.8 3.3 54.8% 72.6% 44.6% 72.0% 22.2% 59.9% 29.6%
28 2009 22/22 1.8 1.8 65.0% 67.8% 56.2% 56.9% 49.1% 63.5% 38.8% 1998 9/10 5.6 3.1 54.8% 73.0% 49.4% 43.9% 47.4% 62.7% 38.4%
29 2010 36/36 1.5 2.1 61.9% 64.5% 51.4% 59.1% 43.9% 59.5% 38.2% 1999 5/6 4.6 3.0 58.5% 63.4% 43.0% 64.9% 31.7% 54.6% 30.8%
30 2011 27/27 1.9 2.9 59.2% 66.3% 50.1% 57.5% 35.8% 59.7% 36.3% 2000 10/12 6.5 4.0 55.1% 79.1% 48.5% 44.7% 51.7% 65.2% 38.7%
31 2012 31/32 1.8 2.6 60.7% 66.9% 51.7% 52.6% 43.4% 60.8% 34.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2013 6/6 0.7 1.7 59.2% 65.1% 50.0% 58.8% 43.1% 58.7% 30.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 461/482 1.7 2.6 61.2% 66.4% 52.0% 57.4% 43.2% 60.8% 37.9% — 164/248 6.2 4.9 53.7% 72.7% 46.9% 57.3% 43.0% 60.7% 36.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Olivier Rochus Diego Nargiso
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1511 117.3 — — — — — +35 — 42.9% -0.43 0–1 — — -0.22
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1627 124.8 — — — — -27 -80 -33 46.9% -0.81 2–5 (29%) 11–1 (92%) 106.6 +0.18
19 2000 1677 119.0 -0.45 +3.01 1.066 51.4% -130 -26 +6 54.1% +0.41 5–0 (100%) 3–7 (30%) 104.6 -0.10 1989 1593 128.6 — — — — -51 +6 -10 40.5% -0.61 6–6 (50%) 5–7 (42%) 100.5 -1.78
20 2001 1571 116.8 -3.32 -1.56 0.830 46.4% -105 +48 +68 36.5% -0.88 2–6 (25%) 4–11 (27%) 91.7 -0.37 1990 1621 133.5 — — — — -33 -6 — 37.5% -0.67 2–0 3–3 (50%) — -0.55
21 2002 1613 129.1 -2.11 +3.31 1.040 50.9% -63 -2 +83 45.6% -0.32 6–12 (33%) 5–3 (63%) 100.8 +0.06 1991 1604 129.0 +1.95 -2.04 0.984 49.3% -51 +20 +36 45.6% -0.21 1–6 (14%) 9–10 (47%) 95.1 -0.69
22 2003 1697 137.1 -2.29 +0.22 0.931 48.6% -5 -114 +39 44.6% -0.42 10–7 (59%) 9–10 (47%) 104.0 -1.11 1992 1597 130.3 +1.50 -1.75 0.972 49.7% +42 -3 +10 51.9% -0.02 4–12 (25%) 9–7 (56%) 94.6 +2.22
23 2004 1701 131.3 -1.59 +1.62 0.996 50.2% +16 -109 -28 46.2% +0.02 6–8 (43%) 4–12 (25%) 93.5 -0.73 1993 1526 127.3 -0.86 -2.64 0.886 47.7% +68 +4 — 33.3% -0.83 2–6 (25%) 6–13 (32%) 94.7 -0.26
24 2005 1820 148.2 +0.69 +0.87 1.002 50.2% +20 -217 -72 52.7% +0.22 12–2 (86%) 14–17 (45%) 107.0 -2.32 1994 1532 129.5 -2.33 -0.45 0.916 48.2% +95 -56 +44 38.9% -0.65 5–7 (42%) 5–5 (50%) 101.5 +0.26
25 2006 1805 150.3 +1.26 +3.53 1.125 52.1% +24 -107 -6 60.0% +0.73 9–12 (43%) 14–10 (58%) 102.9 -0.74 1995 1530 121.5 -1.52 -1.31 0.895 48.0% +72 -44 +59 38.9% -0.47 0–3 (0%) 3–5 (38%) 96.1 +0.11
26 2007 1716 137.2 -0.83 +1.10 0.955 48.9% +68 -64 -35 43.6% -0.50 6–4 (60%) 5–9 (36%) 96.3 -1.36 1996 1508 114.3 -4.18 -0.49 0.799 46.0% +85 -38 — 32.3% -1.42 2–4 (33%) 3–2 (60%) 98.9 -0.08
27 2008 1664 133.8 -2.99 -0.08 0.882 47.9% +51 -44 -7 34.5% -1.18 3–6 (33%) 3–6 (33%) 93.7 -2.32 1997 1547 124.6 +0.07 -0.53 0.739 45.4% +84 — — 33.3% -0.75 2–0 1–1 — -0.59
28 2009 1753 132.8 -0.28 +1.87 1.063 51.3% +14 -144 +47 51.8% +0.46 8–1 (89%) 3–3 (50%) 108.9 +1.32 1998 1564 120.6 +0.37 -0.45 1.029 50.3% +93 -104 — 50.0% -0.33 0–4 (0%) 0–1 — +0.18
29 2010 1677 137.1 -2.69 +1.27 0.943 49.0% +22 -65 +125 44.9% -0.56 4–8 (33%) 4–3 (57%) 98.5 -1.41 1999 1524 107.2 -1.01 -2.74 0.678 43.7% — -79 — 23.1% -1.54 0–1 0–3 (0%) — 0.00
30 2011 1688 130.3 -1.90 -0.21 0.899 48.1% +17 -84 +179 41.8% -0.82 7–1 (88%) 7–5 (58%) 108.2 +0.40 2000 1625 118.8 +1.47 -0.06 1.112 51.4% +19 -21 — 68.0% +0.72 4–1 (80%) 3–2 (60%) 106.9 +0.50
31 2012 1646 138.1 -1.37 -0.92 0.886 47.8% +69 -124 +98 32.9% -1.05 5–8 (38%) 7–10 (41%) 92.9 -1.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2013 1672 125.8 -1.18 -1.22 0.734 45.3% +52 — — 15.4% -1.92 1–0 — — -0.66 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2014 1631 102.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1867 141.8 -1.24 +1.03 0.966 49.4% +18 -71 +49 45.6% -0.28 84–75 (53%) 82–106 (44%) 99.2 -2.18 — 1703 135.7 -0.19 -1.44 0.926 48.6% +29 -23 +20 42.9% -0.51 30–56 (35%) 58–60 (49%) 97.6 -0.29

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.