H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Olivier Rochus vs Dominik Hrbaty H2H: 1-1
Olivier Rochus and Dominik Hrbaty are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Olivier Rochus leads 1–0 on clay, while Dominik Hrbaty leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Dominik Hrbaty won the 2004 US Open fourth round 2-6 3-6 6-3 6-4 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 45
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
SVK
Age 48
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 8, 2004* | US Open | Grand Slam | R16 | Hard | Dominik Hrbaty | 2-6 3-6 6-3 6-4 6-0 | Olivier Rochus | Match data |
| Jun 1, 2001* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Olivier Rochus | 2-6 6-4 6-4 6-4 | Dominik Hrbaty | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Olivier Rochus | #1,179 | #24 | 1,160 | 1,866 | 220 | 256 | 46.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Dominik Hrbaty | #1,508 | #12 | 1,830 | 1,948 | 326 | 296 | 52.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Olivier Rochus | Dominik Hrbaty | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #78 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2000 | 8–4 | 66.7% | #68 | 1,678 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #40 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2001 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #114 | 1,570 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #46 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2002 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #64 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 37–27 | 57.8% | #21 | 1,700 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2003 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #48 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 38–27 | 58.5% | #17 | 1,843 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2004 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #66 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 28–29 | 49.1% | #36 | 1,678 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2005 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #27 | 1,818 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 22–28 | 44.0% | #51 | 1,670 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2006 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #36 | 1,804 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #61 | 1,670 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2007 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #48 | 1,712 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 40–24 | 62.5% | #14 | 1,742 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2008 | 11–24 | 31.4% | #122 | 1,645 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #18 | 1,823 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 2009 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #57 | 1,751 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #21 | 1,803 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 2010 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #113 | 1,676 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 9–21 | 30.0% | #136 | 1,594 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 2011 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #67 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #253 | 1,563 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | 2012 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #90 | 1,648 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #141 | 1,649 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | 2013 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #201 | 1,673 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #417 | 1,589 | 0 | 6 |