H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 01:16 UTC

Olivier Rochus vs Feliciano Lopez H2H: 3-1

Olivier Rochus holds a 3–1 lead over Feliciano Lopez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass, while Olivier Rochus leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Olivier Rochus won the 2009 Stockholm fourth round 4-6 6-4 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Olivier Rochus
BEL Age 45 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Feliciano Lopez
ESP Age 44 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 23, 2009* Stockholm ATP 250 R16 Hard Olivier Rochus #87 4-6 6-4 6-1 Feliciano Lopez #34 Match data
Jun 22, 2006* Nottingham ATP 250 R32 Grass Feliciano Lopez #49 6-3 6-1 Olivier Rochus #29 Match data
Jun 10, 2005* Halle ATP 250 R16 Grass Olivier Rochus #39 7-6(2) 6-3 Feliciano Lopez #32 Match data
Feb 17, 2005* Rotterdam ATP 250 R32 Hard Olivier Rochus #40 6-4 7-6(4) Feliciano Lopez #20 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Olivier Rochus #1,179 #24 1,160 1,866 220 256 46.2% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Feliciano Lopez #672 #12 2,415 2,013 497 477 51.0% 0 0 0 0 7 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Olivier Rochus Feliciano Lopez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1998 0–1 0.0% #546 1,491 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2000 0–1 0.0% #271 1,480 0 0
19 2000 8–4 66.7% #68 1,678 0 1 2001 2–5 28.6% #159 1,520 0 0
20 2001 9–19 32.1% #114 1,570 0 1 2002 18–16 52.9% #62 1,699 0 0
21 2002 17–22 43.6% #64 1,614 0 1 2003 34–31 52.3% #28 1,841 0 0
22 2003 24–28 46.2% #48 1,697 0 1 2004 30–24 55.6% #25 1,833 0 1
23 2004 17–21 44.7% #66 1,690 0 1 2005 31–26 54.4% #33 1,759 0 1
24 2005 35–25 58.3% #27 1,818 0 1 2006 19–28 40.4% #79 1,676 0 1
25 2006 30–20 60.0% #36 1,804 0 2 2007 27–24 52.9% #35 1,804 0 1
26 2007 18–22 45.0% #48 1,712 0 2 2008 23–24 48.9% #30 1,829 0 1
27 2008 11–24 31.4% #122 1,645 0 2 2009 17–23 42.5% #47 1,724 0 1
28 2009 13–9 59.1% #57 1,751 0 2 2010 27–23 54.0% #32 1,807 0 2
29 2010 14–22 38.9% #113 1,676 0 2 2011 35–25 58.3% #20 1,968 0 2
30 2011 13–14 48.1% #67 1,687 0 2 2012 24–26 48.0% #40 1,844 0 2
31 2012 9–22 29.0% #90 1,648 0 2 2013 30–20 60.0% #28 1,914 0 3
32 2013 2–4 33.3% #201 1,673 0 2 2014 40–25 61.5% #14 1,950 0 4
33 — — — — — — — 2015 32–26 55.2% #17 1,943 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 2016 29–24 54.7% #28 1,890 0 5
35 — — — — — — — 2017 25–24 51.0% #36 1,900 0 6
36 — — — — — — — 2018 22–21 51.2% #64 1,817 0 6
37 — — — — — — — 2019 13–15 46.4% #62 1,824 0 7
38 — — — — — — — 2020 7–10 41.2% #64 1,763 0 7
39 — — — — — — — 2021 9–20 31.0% #106 1,595 0 7
40 — — — — — — — 2022 0–11 0.0% #830 1,468 0 7
41 — — — — — — — 2023 3–4 42.9% #468 1,517 0 7