H2H data updated: 2026-09-10 00:00 UTC

Olivier Rochus vs Feliciano Lopez H2H: 3-1

Olivier Rochus holds a 3–1 lead over Feliciano Lopez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass, while Olivier Rochus leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Olivier Rochus won the 2009 Stockholm Open second round 4-6 6-4 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Olivier Rochus
BEL Age 45 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main-draw meetings
Feliciano Lopez
ESP Age 44 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Olivier Rochus #87 4-6 6-4 6-1 Feliciano Lopez #34 Match data Oct 23, 2009* R16 Stockholm Open ATP 250 Hard
Feliciano Lopez #49 6-3 6-1 Olivier Rochus #29 Match data Jun 22, 2006* R32 Eastbourne Open ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Grass
Olivier Rochus #39 7-6(2) 6-3 Feliciano Lopez #32 Match data Jun 10, 2005* R16 Halle Open ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Grass
Olivier Rochus #40 6-4 7-6(4) Feliciano Lopez #20 Match data Feb 17, 2005* R32 ABN AMRO Open ATP International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Olivier Rochus #1,179 #24 1,160 1,867 223 259 46.3% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Feliciano Lopez #672 #12 2,415 2,010 501 479 51.1% 0 0 0 3 4 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Olivier Rochus Feliciano Lopez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1998 0–1 0.0% #546 1,491 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2000 0–1 0.0% #271 1,480 0 0
19 2000 8–4 66.7% #68 1,676 0 1 2001 2–5 28.6% #159 1,520 0 0
20 2001 9–19 32.1% #114 1,570 0 1 2002 18–16 52.9% #62 1,697 0 0
21 2002 17–22 43.6% #64 1,613 0 1 2003 34–31 52.3% #28 1,840 0 0
22 2003 24–28 46.2% #48 1,697 0 1 2004 32–25 56.1% #25 1,842 0 1
23 2004 18–22 45.0% #66 1,701 0 1 2005 31–26 54.4% #33 1,759 0 1
24 2005 35–25 58.3% #27 1,819 0 1 2006 19–28 40.4% #79 1,675 0 1
25 2006 30–20 60.0% #36 1,804 0 2 2007 27–24 52.9% #35 1,803 0 1
26 2007 18–22 45.0% #48 1,715 0 2 2008 23–24 48.9% #30 1,832 0 1
27 2008 13–25 34.2% #122 1,664 0 2 2009 17–23 42.5% #47 1,725 0 1
28 2009 13–9 59.1% #57 1,752 0 2 2010 27–23 54.0% #32 1,801 0 2
29 2010 14–22 38.9% #113 1,676 0 2 2011 35–25 58.3% #20 1,968 0 2
30 2011 13–14 48.1% #67 1,687 0 2 2012 26–27 49.1% #40 1,857 0 2
31 2012 9–23 28.1% #90 1,645 0 2 2013 30–20 60.0% #28 1,914 0 3
32 2013 2–4 33.3% #201 1,671 0 2 2014 40–25 61.5% #14 1,947 0 4
33 — — — — — — — 2015 32–26 55.2% #17 1,942 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 2016 29–24 54.7% #28 1,888 0 5
35 — — — — — — — 2017 25–24 51.0% #36 1,902 0 6
36 — — — — — — — 2018 22–21 51.2% #64 1,806 0 6
37 — — — — — — — 2019 13–15 46.4% #62 1,807 0 7
38 — — — — — — — 2020 7–10 41.2% #64 1,756 0 7
39 — — — — — — — 2021 9–20 31.0% #106 1,593 0 7
40 — — — — — — — 2022 0–11 0.0% #830 1,468 0 7
41 — — — — — — — 2023 3–4 42.9% #468 1,517 0 7

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Olivier Rochus Feliciano Lopez
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 2000 1 3 4 25.0% 5 0 5 100.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2001 — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — —
20 2001 0 7 7 0.0% 7 9 16 43.8% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2002 11 10 21 52.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
21 2002 5 9 14 35.7% 7 9 16 43.8% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 2003 14 14 28 50.0% 13 10 23 56.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 4 7 42.9%
22 2003 12 11 23 52.2% 4 10 14 28.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 4 8 50.0% 2004 17 12 29 58.6% 9 8 17 52.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
23 2004 9 11 20 45.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2005 18 14 32 56.3% 7 8 15 46.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 2005 24 13 37 64.9% 3 7 10 30.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 2006 9 16 25 36.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
25 2006 17 12 29 58.6% 8 4 12 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 2007 20 15 35 57.1% 5 6 11 45.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2007 13 12 25 52.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2008 17 17 34 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
27 2008 8 14 22 36.4% 4 8 12 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2009 11 15 26 42.3% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
28 2009 6 5 11 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2010 15 15 30 50.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
29 2010 6 12 18 33.3% 4 7 11 36.4% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2011 17 15 32 53.1% 13 8 21 61.9% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
30 2011 4 6 10 40.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — 2012 15 16 31 48.4% 8 8 16 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
31 2012 7 12 19 36.8% 0 6 6 0.0% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 2013 15 13 28 53.6% 6 5 11 54.5% 9 2 11 81.8% — — — —
32 2013 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2014 22 16 38 57.9% 6 7 13 46.2% 12 2 14 85.7% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 20 14 34 58.8% 9 8 17 52.9% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 16 14 30 53.3% 11 7 18 61.1% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 8 15 23 34.8% 8 7 15 53.3% 9 2 11 81.8% — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 12 12 24 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 7 10 17 41.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 5 8 13 38.5% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 2 10 12 16.7% 3 6 9 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — —
40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 0 5 5 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — —
41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
Career — 114 130 244 46.7% 56 81 137 40.9% 43 38 81 53.1% 10 10 20 50.0% — 272 277 549 49.5% 130 137 267 48.7% 89 53 142 62.7% 10 12 22 45.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 461/482 of Olivier Rochus's and 957/979 of Feliciano Lopez's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Olivier Rochus Feliciano Lopez
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1998 1/1 0.0 0.0 73.0% 37.0% 50.0% 28.6% 0.0% 40.5% 34.0%
19 2000 9/12 2.8 2.3 63.9% 67.8% 50.2% 63.7% 31.7% 61.5% 41.0% 2001 7/7 5.6 2.9 59.3% 66.9% 49.1% 54.8% 43.7% 59.4% 35.1%
20 2001 26/28 2.0 3.1 57.0% 63.5% 49.3% 43.5% 44.1% 57.3% 35.4% 2002 30/34 9.7 4.3 60.4% 73.0% 48.8% 58.0% 42.1% 63.4% 30.5%
21 2002 31/39 1.8 2.9 56.9% 66.3% 50.4% 55.4% 44.8% 59.0% 42.7% 2003 61/65 8.1 3.3 58.2% 74.6% 52.4% 67.5% 43.8% 65.3% 33.3%
22 2003 51/52 1.5 2.5 61.8% 65.2% 50.1% 52.3% 44.3% 59.2% 38.0% 2004 54/57 10.3 3.6 57.2% 77.2% 51.9% 62.9% 40.9% 66.4% 32.3%
23 2004 38/40 1.4 3.1 61.6% 65.8% 53.4% 60.3% 50.4% 61.2% 38.7% 2005 57/57 8.6 3.3 59.8% 75.5% 50.0% 64.7% 36.1% 65.3% 32.9%
24 2005 60/60 2.0 2.7 61.5% 68.4% 54.5% 63.4% 39.9% 63.2% 36.9% 2006 47/47 9.9 3.6 57.2% 75.3% 48.3% 55.3% 36.9% 63.9% 33.4%
25 2006 50/50 1.8 2.7 63.3% 67.8% 55.1% 61.3% 44.1% 63.1% 41.5% 2007 51/51 10.0 3.5 59.7% 75.5% 52.4% 57.9% 40.5% 66.1% 32.9%
26 2007 39/40 1.7 2.5 61.7% 68.0% 50.4% 54.4% 41.6% 61.4% 36.8% 2008 47/47 11.8 3.2 60.1% 75.7% 54.2% 66.9% 41.9% 66.9% 32.1%
27 2008 35/38 1.7 2.4 61.5% 64.4% 50.4% 61.9% 42.3% 59.0% 36.2% 2009 39/40 9.7 2.7 59.1% 73.5% 50.3% 61.4% 41.0% 64.2% 32.2%
28 2009 22/22 1.8 1.8 65.0% 67.8% 56.2% 56.9% 49.1% 63.5% 38.8% 2010 49/50 10.5 3.3 57.4% 77.3% 50.8% 63.1% 37.8% 65.9% 32.3%
29 2010 36/36 1.5 2.1 61.9% 64.5% 51.4% 59.1% 43.9% 59.5% 38.2% 2011 60/60 12.2 3.7 57.6% 77.2% 53.7% 64.7% 36.4% 67.2% 32.7%
30 2011 27/27 1.9 2.9 59.2% 66.3% 50.1% 57.5% 35.8% 59.7% 36.3% 2012 50/53 9.9 3.4 56.6% 76.1% 51.1% 66.1% 38.5% 65.3% 32.4%
31 2012 31/32 1.8 2.6 60.7% 66.9% 51.7% 52.6% 43.4% 60.8% 34.7% 2013 49/50 11.1 3.6 58.9% 74.8% 53.2% 68.2% 39.1% 66.2% 33.8%
32 2013 6/6 0.7 1.7 59.2% 65.1% 50.0% 58.8% 43.1% 58.7% 30.3% 2014 64/65 10.0 3.1 59.5% 77.2% 52.4% 64.0% 36.1% 67.2% 32.4%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 58/58 12.7 3.6 57.3% 76.5% 53.6% 66.4% 33.4% 66.8% 34.1%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 53/53 11.0 3.2 57.8% 77.8% 51.5% 63.1% 38.5% 66.5% 35.4%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 48/49 10.8 2.9 59.5% 77.0% 51.4% 64.1% 38.3% 66.5% 32.8%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 42/43 11.8 3.1 60.9% 76.5% 48.6% 63.3% 39.5% 65.4% 32.2%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 26/28 12.9 4.2 56.7% 76.5% 51.9% 66.8% 36.0% 66.0% 31.5%
38 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 17/17 14.2 5.1 53.7% 79.3% 47.9% 70.8% 37.0% 64.8% 31.2%
39 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 29/29 10.4 4.8 55.1% 77.3% 50.8% 53.0% 43.1% 65.2% 30.2%
40 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 11/11 9.4 5.6 51.6% 74.1% 39.5% 56.6% 18.7% 57.1% 29.2%
41 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 7/7 10.4 4.4 54.3% 76.6% 52.7% 65.7% 26.4% 65.9% 29.1%
Career — 461/482 1.7 2.6 61.2% 66.4% 52.0% 57.4% 43.2% 60.8% 37.9% — 957/980 10.5 3.5 58.2% 76.0% 51.4% 63.4% 38.4% 65.7% 32.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Olivier Rochus Feliciano Lopez
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1491 95.8 +0.71 -0.39 0.571 36.7% — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — -0.03
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1480 100.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.09
19 2000 1677 119.0 -0.45 +3.01 1.066 51.4% -130 -26 +6 54.1% +0.41 5–0 (100%) 3–7 (30%) 104.6 -0.10 2001 1520 116.2 -0.46 -2.22 0.863 47.5% — +31 — 38.9% -0.78 0–3 (0%) 3–1 (75%) 98.5 +0.17
20 2001 1571 116.8 -3.32 -1.56 0.830 46.4% -105 +48 +68 36.5% -0.88 2–6 (25%) 4–11 (27%) 91.7 -0.37 2002 1698 127.3 +1.48 -5.32 0.834 47.5% -42 -107 -65 47.5% -0.35 13–4 (76%) 10–8 (56%) 114.4 +0.51
21 2002 1613 129.1 -2.11 +3.31 1.040 50.9% -63 -2 +83 45.6% -0.32 6–12 (33%) 5–3 (63%) 100.8 +0.06 2003 1841 141.9 +3.32 -2.91 0.959 49.6% -82 -104 -140 51.6% -0.01 11–11 (50%) 20–17 (54%) 105.0 -2.29
22 2003 1697 137.1 -2.29 +0.22 0.931 48.6% -5 -114 +39 44.6% -0.42 10–7 (59%) 9–10 (47%) 104.0 -1.11 2004 1843 141.1 +3.06 -2.87 0.962 49.6% -4 -87 -139 53.5% +0.07 12–9 (57%) 13–16 (45%) 100.2 +0.64
23 2004 1701 131.3 -1.59 +1.62 0.996 50.2% +16 -109 -28 46.2% +0.02 6–8 (43%) 4–12 (25%) 93.5 -0.73 2005 1760 138.7 +2.28 -3.17 0.949 49.1% -15 -35 +85 52.0% -0.07 13–7 (65%) 18–15 (55%) 103.7 -0.87
24 2005 1820 148.2 +0.69 +0.87 1.002 50.2% +20 -217 -72 52.7% +0.22 12–2 (86%) 14–17 (45%) 107.0 -2.32 2006 1676 133.5 +1.55 -2.92 0.925 48.9% -40 +59 +97 41.8% -0.47 9–9 (50%) 11–13 (46%) 98.3 -1.61
25 2006 1805 150.3 +1.26 +3.53 1.125 52.1% +24 -107 -6 60.0% +0.73 9–12 (43%) 14–10 (58%) 102.9 -0.74 2007 1803 144.0 +3.00 -2.42 0.971 49.7% -12 -87 -39 52.6% -0.04 8–10 (44%) 21–14 (60%) 104.0 -1.68
26 2007 1716 137.2 -0.83 +1.10 0.955 48.9% +68 -64 -35 43.6% -0.50 6–4 (60%) 5–9 (36%) 96.3 -1.36 2008 1832 150.3 +3.61 -2.59 0.970 49.7% +8 -169 +26 50.4% -0.12 6–10 (38%) 17–8 (68%) 103.6 -1.42
27 2008 1664 133.8 -2.99 -0.08 0.882 47.9% +51 -44 -7 34.5% -1.18 3–6 (33%) 3–6 (33%) 93.7 -2.32 2009 1726 141.9 +1.43 -2.88 0.900 48.4% +26 -48 +98 47.2% -0.30 7–11 (39%) 13–9 (59%) 100.2 -0.15
28 2009 1753 132.8 -0.28 +1.87 1.063 51.3% +14 -144 +47 51.8% +0.46 8–1 (89%) 3–3 (50%) 108.9 +1.32 2010 1802 148.0 +2.32 -2.85 0.948 49.5% -6 -112 +49 50.0% -0.03 6–2 (75%) 13–13 (50%) 104.4 +0.29
29 2010 1677 137.1 -2.69 +1.27 0.943 49.0% +22 -65 +125 44.9% -0.56 4–8 (33%) 4–3 (57%) 98.5 -1.41 2011 1969 161.7 +4.60 -2.41 0.997 49.9% -64 -112 +32 55.2% +0.10 12–10 (55%) 28–17 (62%) 111.3 -3.54
30 2011 1688 130.3 -1.90 -0.21 0.899 48.1% +17 -84 +179 41.8% -0.82 7–1 (88%) 7–5 (58%) 108.2 +0.40 2012 1858 151.5 +1.97 -3.28 0.934 49.0% +2 -55 +79 48.8% +0.13 10–5 (67%) 14–25 (36%) 96.1 -1.11
31 2012 1646 138.1 -1.37 -0.92 0.886 47.8% +69 -124 +98 32.9% -1.05 5–8 (38%) 7–10 (41%) 92.9 -1.15 2013 1915 149.8 +2.60 -1.97 0.997 50.1% -40 -64 +140 53.7% +0.07 9–6 (60%) 14–10 (58%) 105.2 -0.06
32 2013 1672 125.8 -1.18 -1.22 0.734 45.3% +52 — — 15.4% -1.92 1–0 — — -0.66 2014 1948 155.3 +3.04 -2.60 0.987 49.8% -17 -179 +209 55.8% +0.15 14–3 (82%) 22–19 (54%) 109.9 +2.25
33 2014 1631 102.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1943 158.0 +2.20 -0.75 1.029 50.3% +56 -176 +79 54.8% +0.18 12–13 (48%) 26–15 (63%) 102.1 +2.95
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1889 154.0 +2.36 -0.30 1.055 50.8% +25 -36 +78 54.5% +0.23 10–10 (50%) 20–15 (57%) 102.4 +1.68
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1903 154.4 +2.94 -2.24 0.978 49.7% -97 -32 +126 51.2% +0.07 11–10 (52%) 16–15 (52%) 99.6 -1.42
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1806 142.4 +1.63 -2.71 0.932 49.0% -27 +12 +191 44.6% -0.49 10–4 (71%) 13–9 (59%) 107.5 +0.44
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1808 139.4 +1.43 -2.84 0.926 48.8% -26 -93 +213 47.3% -0.08 7–5 (58%) 9–13 (41%) 99.1 -1.25
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1756 143.9 +1.90 -3.41 0.888 48.9% +5 -63 — 40.9% -0.45 3–3 (50%) 5–5 (50%) 100.8 -1.13
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1593 125.8 +0.90 -5.11 0.867 47.8% +32 +34 +333 36.8% -0.80 2–9 (18%) 8–7 (53%) 90.3 +0.52
40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1468 99.6 -3.78 -3.84 0.681 43.1% +58 — +305 14.3% -2.43 0–3 (0%) 2–2 (50%) 96.8 +0.10
41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1517 114.8 +0.13 -1.94 0.853 48.1% — — +211 43.8% -0.87 1–1 3–3 (50%) — -0.06
Career — 1867 141.8 -1.24 +1.03 0.966 49.4% +18 -71 +49 45.6% -0.28 84–75 (53%) 82–106 (44%) 99.2 -2.18 — 2011 152.3 +2.42 -2.62 0.953 49.3% -16 -72 +109 49.9% -0.11 186–158 (54%) 319–269 (54%) 107.2 -0.72

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.