H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Olivier Rochus vs Fernando Vicente H2H: 2-1
Olivier Rochus holds a 2–1 lead over Fernando Vicente in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Olivier Rochus leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Olivier Rochus won the 2009 Halle third round 6-0 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 45
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 49
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 11, 2009* | Halle | ATP 500 | R32 | Grass | Olivier Rochus | 6-0 6-0 | Fernando Vicente | Match data |
| Aug 21, 2003* | Long Island | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Olivier Rochus | 7-6(5) 6-1 | Fernando Vicente | Match data |
| Aug 14, 2002* | Washington | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Fernando Vicente | 6-2 6-7(2) 6-2 | Olivier Rochus | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Olivier Rochus | #1,179 | #24 | 1,160 | 1,866 | 220 | 256 | 46.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Fernando Vicente | #1,019 | #29 | 993 | 1,762 | 158 | 212 | 42.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Olivier Rochus | Fernando Vicente | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2000 | 8–4 | 66.7% | #68 | 1,678 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #151 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2001 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #114 | 1,570 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #121 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2002 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #64 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2003 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #48 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 25–29 | 46.3% | #49 | 1,638 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2004 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #66 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 23–31 | 42.6% | #47 | 1,615 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2005 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #27 | 1,818 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #52 | 1,637 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2006 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #36 | 1,804 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #58 | 1,618 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2007 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #48 | 1,712 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 20–29 | 40.8% | #63 | 1,600 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2008 | 11–24 | 31.4% | #122 | 1,645 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #187 | 1,593 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2009 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #57 | 1,751 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #110 | 1,614 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2010 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #113 | 1,676 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #111 | 1,461 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2011 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #67 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #168 | 1,508 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2012 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #90 | 1,648 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #206 | 1,484 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 2013 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #201 | 1,673 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #420 | 1,489 | 0 | 3 |