H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Olivier Rochus vs Hicham Arazi H2H: 0-3
Hicham Arazi holds a 3–0 lead over Olivier Rochus in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Hicham Arazi leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Hicham Arazi won the 2004 Indian Wells Masters first round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 45
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
MAR
Age 52
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 9, 2004* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Hicham Arazi | 6-4 6-2 | Olivier Rochus | Match data |
| Aug 28, 2002* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Hicham Arazi | 6-2 6-2 6-4 | Olivier Rochus | Match data |
| Jun 29, 2001* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Hicham Arazi | 7-6(3) 7-6(3) 7-6(3) | Olivier Rochus | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Olivier Rochus | #1,179 | #24 | 1,160 | 1,866 | 220 | 256 | 46.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Hicham Arazi | #793 | #22 | 1,240 | 1,864 | 202 | 213 | 48.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Olivier Rochus | Hicham Arazi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2000 | 8–4 | 66.7% | #68 | 1,678 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2001 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #114 | 1,570 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2002 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #64 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #141 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2003 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #48 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #79 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2004 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #66 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #38 | 1,624 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2005 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #27 | 1,818 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #36 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2006 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #36 | 1,804 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #36 | 1,702 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2007 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #48 | 1,712 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #30 | 1,775 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2008 | 11–24 | 31.4% | #122 | 1,645 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #25 | 1,833 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2009 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #57 | 1,751 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #90 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2010 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #113 | 1,676 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #52 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2011 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #67 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #62 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2012 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #90 | 1,648 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #897 | 1,672 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2013 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #201 | 1,673 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |