H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Olivier Rochus vs Irakli Labadze H2H: 1-1
Olivier Rochus and Irakli Labadze are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Irakli Labadze leads 1–0 on clay, while Olivier Rochus leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Olivier Rochus won the 2003 Nottingham third round 6-0 4-1 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 45
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
GEO
Age 45
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 19, 2003* | Nottingham | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Olivier Rochus | 6-0 4-1 (ret.) | Irakli Labadze | Match data |
| Apr 11, 2002* | Casablanca | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Irakli Labadze | 6-0 6-1 | Olivier Rochus | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Olivier Rochus | #1,179 | #24 | 1,160 | 1,866 | 220 | 256 | 46.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Irakli Labadze | #656 | #42 | 805 | 1,679 | 41 | 79 | 34.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Olivier Rochus | Irakli Labadze | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #302 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2000 | 8–4 | 66.7% | #68 | 1,678 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2001 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #114 | 1,570 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #109 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2002 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #64 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2003 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #48 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 6–17 | 26.1% | #72 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2004 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #66 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #78 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2005 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #27 | 1,818 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #140 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2006 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #36 | 1,804 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #164 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2007 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #48 | 1,712 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2008 | 11–24 | 31.4% | #122 | 1,645 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2009 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #57 | 1,751 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2010 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #113 | 1,676 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2011 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #67 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2012 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #90 | 1,648 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2013 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #201 | 1,673 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |