H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Olivier Rochus vs Jan-Michael Gambill H2H: 1-1
Olivier Rochus and Jan-Michael Gambill are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Olivier Rochus leads 1–0 on clay, while Jan-Michael Gambill leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jan-Michael Gambill won the 2002 Stockholm third round 6-1 3-6 7-6(8).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 45
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 49
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 2002* | Stockholm | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Jan-Michael Gambill | 6-1 3-6 7-6(8) | Olivier Rochus | Match data |
| May 24, 2002* | St. Poelten | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Olivier Rochus | 7-5 2-6 6-4 | Jan-Michael Gambill | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Olivier Rochus | #1,179 | #24 | 1,160 | 1,866 | 220 | 256 | 46.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Jan-Michael Gambill | #1,352 | #14 | 1,655 | 1,956 | 201 | 191 | 51.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Olivier Rochus | Jan-Michael Gambill | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #555 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2000 | 8–4 | 66.7% | #68 | 1,678 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2001 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #114 | 1,570 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #186 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2002 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #64 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #38 | 1,764 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2003 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #48 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,764 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2004 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #66 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 33–26 | 55.9% | #33 | 1,804 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2005 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #27 | 1,818 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #21 | 1,745 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2006 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #36 | 1,804 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #42 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2007 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #48 | 1,712 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #51 | 1,642 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2008 | 11–24 | 31.4% | #122 | 1,645 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #95 | 1,595 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2009 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #57 | 1,751 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,557 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2010 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #113 | 1,676 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #687 | 1,567 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2011 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #67 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1107 | 1,503 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2012 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #90 | 1,648 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2013 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #201 | 1,673 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |