H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Olivier Rochus vs Lleyton Hewitt H2H: 1-2

Lleyton Hewitt holds a 2–1 lead over Olivier Rochus in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Lleyton Hewitt leads 2–1 on grass. Most recently, Olivier Rochus won the 2011 Eastbourne third round 6-2 3-0 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Olivier Rochus
BEL Age 45 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Lleyton Hewitt
AUS Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 15, 2011* Eastbourne ATP 250 R32 Grass Olivier Rochus #89 6-2 3-0 (ret.) Lleyton Hewitt #130 Match data
Jul 2, 2006* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Lleyton Hewitt #9 6-1 6-4 6-4 Olivier Rochus #29 Match data
Jun 14, 2002* Queen's Club ATP 250 R16 Grass Lleyton Hewitt #1 6-2 6-1 Olivier Rochus #65 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Olivier Rochus #1,179 #24 1,160 1,866 220 256 46.2% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Lleyton Hewitt #636 #1 5,205 2,159 564 241 70.1% 2 2 2 1 23 30

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Olivier Rochus Lleyton Hewitt
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1997 0–1 0.0% #550 1,492 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1998 10–9 52.6% #100 1,614 0 1
18 — — — — — — — 1999 40–18 69.0% #25 1,853 0 2
19 2000 8–4 66.7% #68 1,678 0 1 2000 53–15 77.9% #7 1,993 0 6
20 2001 9–19 32.1% #114 1,570 0 1 2001 71–15 82.6% #1 2,116 1 12
21 2002 17–22 43.6% #64 1,614 0 1 2002 61–16 79.2% #1 2,062 2 17
22 2003 24–28 46.2% #48 1,697 0 1 2003 29–10 74.4% #17 1,939 2 19
23 2004 17–21 44.7% #66 1,690 0 1 2004 64–16 80.0% #3 2,076 2 23
24 2005 35–25 58.3% #27 1,818 0 1 2005 36–9 80.0% #4 2,092 2 24
25 2006 30–20 60.0% #36 1,804 0 2 2006 32–14 69.6% #20 1,964 2 25
26 2007 18–22 45.0% #48 1,712 0 2 2007 34–15 69.4% #21 1,925 2 26
27 2008 11–24 31.4% #122 1,645 0 2 2008 17–10 63.0% #67 1,936 2 26
28 2009 13–9 59.1% #57 1,751 0 2 2009 33–19 63.5% #22 1,956 2 27
29 2010 14–22 38.9% #113 1,676 0 2 2010 18–11 62.1% #54 1,907 2 28
30 2011 13–14 48.1% #67 1,687 0 2 2011 8–9 47.1% #186 1,817 2 28
31 2012 9–22 29.0% #90 1,648 0 2 2012 13–11 54.2% #83 1,867 2 28
32 2013 2–4 33.3% #201 1,673 0 2 2013 22–18 55.0% #60 1,884 2 28
33 — — — — — — — 2014 19–15 55.9% #50 1,841 2 30
34 — — — — — — — 2015 3–9 25.0% #307 1,715 2 30
35 — — — — — — — 2016 1–1 50.0% #633 1,727 2 30