H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Olivier Rochus vs Mardy Fish H2H: 1-2
Mardy Fish holds a 2–1 lead over Olivier Rochus in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Olivier Rochus leads 1–0 on carpet, while Mardy Fish leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Mardy Fish won the 2010 Newport final 5-7 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 45
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 44
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 11, 2010* | Newport | ATP 250 | F | Grass | Mardy Fish | 5-7 6-3 6-4 | Olivier Rochus | Match data |
| Oct 26, 2007* | Lyon | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Olivier Rochus | 6-7(5) 7-6(6) 7-6(15) | Mardy Fish | Match data |
| Aug 21, 2002* | Long Island | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Mardy Fish | 6-4 1-6 6-3 | Olivier Rochus | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Olivier Rochus | #1,179 | #24 | 1,160 | 1,866 | 220 | 256 | 46.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Mardy Fish | #619 | #7 | 3,060 | 2,114 | 290 | 211 | 57.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Olivier Rochus | Mardy Fish | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #305 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2000 | 8–4 | 66.7% | #68 | 1,678 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #141 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2001 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #114 | 1,570 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #84 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2002 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #64 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 38–23 | 62.3% | #20 | 1,841 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2003 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #48 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #37 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2004 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #66 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #225 | 1,625 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2005 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #27 | 1,818 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #47 | 1,729 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2006 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #36 | 1,804 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #39 | 1,756 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2007 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #48 | 1,712 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #24 | 1,854 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2008 | 11–24 | 31.4% | #122 | 1,645 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #55 | 1,789 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2009 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #57 | 1,751 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 38–15 | 71.7% | #16 | 2,009 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 2010 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #113 | 1,676 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #8 | 2,012 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 2011 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #67 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 20–12 | 62.5% | #27 | 2,008 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | 2012 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #90 | 1,648 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #373 | 1,932 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | 2013 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #201 | 1,673 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #423 | 1,882 | 0 | 6 |