H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Olivier Rochus vs Michal Tabara H2H: 0-2
Michal Tabara holds a 2–0 lead over Olivier Rochus in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Michal Tabara leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Michal Tabara won the 2001 Bastad third round 6-7(10) 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 45
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 46
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 12, 2001* | Bastad | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Michal Tabara | 6-7(10) 6-4 6-4 | Olivier Rochus | Match data |
| May 5, 2001* | Houston | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Michal Tabara | 6-4 6-2 | Olivier Rochus | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Olivier Rochus | #1,179 | #24 | 1,160 | 1,866 | 220 | 256 | 46.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Michal Tabara | #1,290 | #47 | 773 | 1,686 | 39 | 52 | 42.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Olivier Rochus | Michal Tabara | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #309 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #216 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #202 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2000 | 8–4 | 66.7% | #68 | 1,678 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #123 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2001 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #114 | 1,570 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #96 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2002 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #64 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #64 | 1,597 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2003 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #48 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #210 | 1,587 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2004 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #66 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2005 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #27 | 1,818 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #98 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2006 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #36 | 1,804 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #172 | 1,557 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2007 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #48 | 1,712 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2008 | 11–24 | 31.4% | #122 | 1,645 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2009 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #57 | 1,751 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2010 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #113 | 1,676 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2011 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #67 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2012 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #90 | 1,648 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2013 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #201 | 1,673 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |