H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Olivier Rochus vs Nicolas Kiefer H2H: 3-1

Olivier Rochus holds a 3–1 lead over Nicolas Kiefer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Olivier Rochus leads 3–0 on hard courts, while Nicolas Kiefer leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Olivier Rochus won the 2007 Mumbai quarterfinal 4-1 RET.

BEL Age 45 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
3 1
4 main draw meetings
GER Age 49 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 29, 2007* Mumbai ATP 250 QF Hard Olivier Rochus #66 4-1 (ret.) Nicolas Kiefer #130 Match data
Jan 19, 2005* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Olivier Rochus #53 7-5 2-6 3-6 6-2 6-3 Nicolas Kiefer #21 Match data
Jan 8, 2005* Adelaide ATP 250 QF Hard Olivier Rochus #66 6-7(4) 7-6(6) 7-5 Nicolas Kiefer #21 Match data
Jun 12, 2003* Halle ATP 250 R32 Grass Nicolas Kiefer #73 6-3 6-0 Olivier Rochus #65 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Olivier Rochus #1,179 #24 1,160 1,866 220 256 46.2% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Nicolas Kiefer #720 #4 2,447 1,984 343 252 57.6% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Olivier Rochus Nicolas Kiefer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1994 0–1 0.0% #1198 1,489 0 0
17 1995 3–3 50.0% #206 1,527 0 0
18 1996 7–9 43.8% #128 1,562 0 0
19 2000 8–4 66.7% #68 1,678 0 1 1997 26–16 61.9% #32 1,798 0 1
20 2001 9–19 32.1% #114 1,570 0 1 1998 31–25 55.4% #35 1,790 0 1
21 2002 17–22 43.6% #64 1,614 0 1 1999 53–21 71.6% #6 1,921 0 4
22 2003 24–28 46.2% #48 1,697 0 1 2000 30–15 66.7% #20 1,921 0 6
23 2004 17–21 44.7% #66 1,690 0 1 2001 26–25 51.0% #42 1,766 0 6
24 2005 35–25 58.3% #27 1,818 0 1 2002 19–24 44.2% #72 1,718 0 6
25 2006 30–20 60.0% #36 1,804 0 2 2003 19–17 52.8% #58 1,727 0 6
26 2007 18–22 45.0% #48 1,712 0 2 2004 32–19 62.7% #21 1,897 0 6
27 2008 11–24 31.4% #122 1,645 0 2 2005 31–22 58.5% #22 1,854 0 6
28 2009 13–9 59.1% #57 1,751 0 2 2006 14–8 63.6% #48 1,843 0 6
29 2010 14–22 38.9% #113 1,676 0 2 2007 19–12 61.3% #49 1,893 0 6
30 2011 13–14 48.1% #67 1,687 0 2 2008 20–16 55.6% #38 1,876 0 6
31 2012 9–22 29.0% #90 1,648 0 2 2009 12–16 42.9% #116 1,757 0 6
32 2013 2–4 33.3% #201 1,673 0 2 2010 1–3 25.0% #722 1,717 0 6