H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Olivier Rochus vs Nikolay Davydenko H2H: 1-3

Nikolay Davydenko holds a 3–1 lead over Olivier Rochus in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Nikolay Davydenko leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Olivier Rochus won the 2007 Dubai fourth round 4-6 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Olivier Rochus
BEL Age 45 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1 – 3
4 main draw meetings
Nikolay Davydenko
RUS Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 2, 2007* Dubai ATP 500 R16 Hard Olivier Rochus #34 4-6 6-4 6-2 Nikolay Davydenko #4 Match data
Jan 6, 2007* Doha ATP 250 QF Hard Nikolay Davydenko #3 6-4 6-3 Olivier Rochus #36 Match data
Aug 26, 2006* New Haven ATP 250 QF Hard Nikolay Davydenko #7 6-4 6-2 Olivier Rochus #30 Match data
May 27, 2005* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Nikolay Davydenko #12 3-6 7-5 6-2 6-3 Olivier Rochus #45 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Olivier Rochus #1,179 #24 1,160 1,866 220 256 46.2% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Nikolay Davydenko #248 #3 5,335 2,213 467 324 59.0% 0 3 1 1 16 21

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Olivier Rochus Nikolay Davydenko
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 2000 8–4 66.7% #68 1,678 0 1 2000 3–1 75.0% #133 1,544 0 0
20 2001 9–19 32.1% #114 1,570 0 1 2001 6–15 28.6% #79 1,568 0 0
21 2002 17–22 43.6% #64 1,614 0 1 2002 12–24 33.3% #81 1,601 0 0
22 2003 24–28 46.2% #48 1,697 0 1 2003 29–30 49.2% #44 1,595 0 2
23 2004 17–21 44.7% #66 1,690 0 1 2004 32–28 53.3% #28 1,758 0 4
24 2005 35–25 58.3% #27 1,818 0 1 2005 52–29 64.2% #5 1,868 0 5
25 2006 30–20 60.0% #36 1,804 0 2 2006 67–28 70.5% #3 1,971 0 10
26 2007 18–22 45.0% #48 1,712 0 2 2007 53–30 63.9% #4 1,935 0 11
27 2008 11–24 31.4% #122 1,645 0 2 2008 51–20 71.8% #5 1,974 0 14
28 2009 13–9 59.1% #57 1,751 0 2 2009 57–19 75.0% #6 2,142 0 19
29 2010 14–22 38.9% #113 1,676 0 2 2010 29–19 60.4% #22 1,897 0 20
30 2011 13–14 48.1% #67 1,687 0 2 2011 26–25 51.0% #41 1,848 0 21
31 2012 9–22 29.0% #90 1,648 0 2 2012 23–24 48.9% #44 1,824 0 21
32 2013 2–4 33.3% #201 1,673 0 2 2013 22–22 50.0% #53 1,824 0 21
33 — — — — — — — 2014 5–10 33.3% #250 1,730 0 21