H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Olivier Rochus vs Radek Stepanek H2H: 2-1

Olivier Rochus holds a 2–1 lead over Radek Stepanek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Olivier Rochus leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Olivier Rochus won the 2005 Adelaide fourth round 6-0 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Olivier Rochus
BEL Age 45 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Radek Stepanek
CZE Age 47 Right-Handed 186 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 7, 2005* Adelaide ATP 250 R16 Hard Olivier Rochus #66 6-0 6-3 Radek Stepanek #33 Match data
Feb 19, 2004* Rotterdam ATP 250 R32 Hard Radek Stepanek #48 5-7 6-2 6-2 Olivier Rochus #49 Match data
Mar 1, 2003* Copenhagen ATP 250 SF Hard Olivier Rochus #84 6-3 6-7(2) 6-4 Radek Stepanek #56 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Olivier Rochus #1,179 #24 1,160 1,866 220 256 46.2% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Radek Stepanek #492 #8 2,700 2,034 366 283 56.4% 0 0 0 1 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Olivier Rochus Radek Stepanek
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 2000 8–4 66.7% #68 1,678 0 1 1998 0–1 0.0% #165 1,488 0 0
20 2001 9–19 32.1% #114 1,570 0 1 1999 2–4 33.3% #169 1,501 0 0
21 2002 17–22 43.6% #64 1,614 0 1 — — — — — — —
22 2003 24–28 46.2% #48 1,697 0 1 2001 0–1 0.0% #542 1,464 0 0
23 2004 17–21 44.7% #66 1,690 0 1 2002 17–14 54.8% #63 1,659 0 0
24 2005 35–25 58.3% #27 1,818 0 1 2003 24–22 52.2% #46 1,716 0 0
25 2006 30–20 60.0% #36 1,804 0 2 2004 28–23 54.9% #33 1,790 0 0
26 2007 18–22 45.0% #48 1,712 0 2 2005 45–26 63.4% #20 1,840 0 0
27 2008 11–24 31.4% #122 1,645 0 2 2006 30–15 66.7% #19 1,865 0 1
28 2009 13–9 59.1% #57 1,751 0 2 2007 27–21 56.2% #30 1,863 0 2
29 2010 14–22 38.9% #113 1,676 0 2 2008 31–23 57.4% #27 1,837 0 2
30 2011 13–14 48.1% #67 1,687 0 2 2009 44–19 69.8% #12 2,010 0 4
31 2012 9–22 29.0% #90 1,648 0 2 2010 17–15 53.1% #62 1,872 0 4
32 2013 2–4 33.3% #201 1,673 0 2 2011 30–24 55.6% #28 1,880 0 5
33 — — — — — — — 2012 21–19 52.5% #31 1,930 0 5
34 — — — — — — — 2013 14–16 46.7% #44 1,828 0 5
35 — — — — — — — 2014 16–17 48.5% #68 1,801 0 5
36 — — — — — — — 2015 7–10 41.2% #197 1,766 0 5
37 — — — — — — — 2016 10–11 47.6% #107 1,866 0 5
38 — — — — — — — 2017 3–2 60.0% #354 1,900 0 5