H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Olivier Rochus vs Sam Querrey H2H: 0-3

Sam Querrey holds a 3–0 lead over Olivier Rochus in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Sam Querrey leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Sam Querrey won the 2013 ASB Classic second round 7-5 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Olivier Rochus
BEL Age 45 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0 – 3
3 main draw meetings
Sam Querrey
USA Age 38 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Sam Querrey #22 7-5 6-3 Olivier Rochus #89 Match data Jan 10, 2013* R16 ASB Classic ATP 250 Hard
Sam Querrey #77 6-1 6-7(4) 6-4 Olivier Rochus #61 Match data Jun 13, 2012* R64 Queen's Club Championships ATP 250 Grass
Sam Querrey #62 6-3 6-2 7-5 Olivier Rochus #56 Match data Jan 16, 2008* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Olivier Rochus #1,179 #24 1,160 1,867 223 259 46.3% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Sam Querrey #529 #11 2,595 2,038 372 316 54.1% 0 0 0 2 8 10

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Olivier Rochus Sam Querrey
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 2006 6–11 35.3% #130 1,541 0 0
19 2000 8–4 66.7% #68 1,676 0 1 2007 19–22 46.3% #63 1,637 0 0
20 2001 9–19 32.1% #114 1,570 0 1 2008 28–24 53.8% #39 1,778 0 1
21 2002 17–22 43.6% #64 1,613 0 1 2009 39–22 63.9% #25 1,900 0 2
22 2003 24–28 46.2% #48 1,697 0 1 2010 35–21 62.5% #18 1,872 0 6
23 2004 18–22 45.0% #66 1,701 0 1 2011 12–13 48.0% #93 1,817 0 6
24 2005 35–25 58.3% #27 1,819 0 1 2012 37–24 60.7% #22 2,005 0 7
25 2006 30–20 60.0% #36 1,804 0 2 2013 25–21 54.3% #46 1,875 0 7
26 2007 18–22 45.0% #48 1,715 0 2 2014 26–20 56.5% #35 1,896 0 7
27 2008 13–25 34.2% #122 1,664 0 2 2015 20–24 45.5% #59 1,812 0 7
28 2009 13–9 59.1% #57 1,752 0 2 2016 28–23 54.9% #31 1,797 0 8
29 2010 14–22 38.9% #113 1,676 0 2 2017 35–20 63.6% #13 1,944 0 10
30 2011 13–14 48.1% #67 1,687 0 2 2018 21–22 48.8% #51 1,823 0 10
31 2012 9–23 28.1% #90 1,645 0 2 2019 24–17 58.5% #44 1,898 0 10
32 2013 2–4 33.3% #201 1,671 0 2 2020 3–6 33.3% #53 1,818 0 10
33 — — — — — — — 2021 10–16 38.5% #108 1,689 0 10
34 — — — — — — — 2022 4–10 28.6% #329 1,644 0 10

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Olivier Rochus Sam Querrey
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 5 10 15 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
19 2000 1 3 4 25.0% 5 0 5 100.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2007 18 14 32 56.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2001 0 7 7 0.0% 7 9 16 43.8% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2008 23 16 39 59.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2002 5 9 14 35.7% 7 9 16 43.8% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 2009 30 14 44 68.2% 1 4 5 20.0% 8 4 12 66.7% — — — —
22 2003 12 11 23 52.2% 4 10 14 28.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 4 8 50.0% 2010 19 14 33 57.6% 7 5 12 58.3% 9 2 11 81.8% — — — —
23 2004 9 11 20 45.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2011 8 8 16 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
24 2005 24 13 37 64.9% 3 7 10 30.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 2012 28 16 44 63.6% 2 4 6 33.3% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — —
25 2006 17 12 29 58.6% 8 4 12 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 2013 21 14 35 60.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
26 2007 13 12 25 52.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2014 16 14 30 53.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
27 2008 8 14 22 36.4% 4 8 12 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2015 8 15 23 34.8% 6 5 11 54.5% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — —
28 2009 6 5 11 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2016 16 14 30 53.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 8 4 12 66.7% — — — —
29 2010 6 12 18 33.3% 4 7 11 36.4% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2017 23 13 36 63.9% 5 4 9 55.6% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — —
30 2011 4 6 10 40.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — 2018 16 16 32 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
31 2012 7 12 19 36.8% 0 6 6 0.0% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 2019 13 14 27 48.1% 3 1 4 75.0% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — —
32 2013 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2020 3 4 7 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 2 9 11 18.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 8 5 13 61.5% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1 5 6 16.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
Career — 114 130 244 46.7% 56 81 137 40.9% 43 38 81 53.1% 10 10 20 50.0% — 250 210 460 54.3% 44 57 101 43.6% 78 47 125 62.4% 0 2 2 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 461/482 of Olivier Rochus's and 684/688 of Sam Querrey's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Olivier Rochus Sam Querrey
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 17/17 11.4 3.2 57.2% 75.9% 49.8% 62.8% 42.9% 64.6% 34.0%
19 2000 9/12 2.8 2.3 63.9% 67.8% 50.2% 63.7% 31.7% 61.5% 41.0% 2007 41/41 12.4 3.2 56.6% 79.2% 48.3% 59.9% 39.4% 65.8% 33.9%
20 2001 26/28 2.0 3.1 57.0% 63.5% 49.3% 43.5% 44.1% 57.3% 35.4% 2008 51/52 10.2 3.2 59.1% 74.3% 49.1% 61.1% 41.2% 64.2% 35.5%
21 2002 31/39 1.8 2.9 56.9% 66.3% 50.4% 55.4% 44.8% 59.0% 42.7% 2009 61/61 11.8 3.0 59.4% 80.0% 53.4% 60.4% 44.4% 69.2% 36.2%
22 2003 51/52 1.5 2.5 61.8% 65.2% 50.1% 52.3% 44.3% 59.2% 38.0% 2010 56/56 12.3 3.4 61.5% 79.4% 50.9% 64.4% 45.2% 68.3% 35.1%
23 2004 38/40 1.4 3.1 61.6% 65.8% 53.4% 60.3% 50.4% 61.2% 38.7% 2011 25/25 8.9 3.2 59.6% 74.8% 51.2% 66.6% 31.2% 65.2% 34.4%
24 2005 60/60 2.0 2.7 61.5% 68.4% 54.5% 63.4% 39.9% 63.2% 36.9% 2012 61/61 11.6 3.9 57.6% 80.5% 51.1% 60.0% 42.0% 68.1% 36.0%
25 2006 50/50 1.8 2.7 63.3% 67.8% 55.1% 61.3% 44.1% 63.1% 41.5% 2013 45/46 12.8 3.6 59.6% 78.6% 48.7% 57.6% 35.7% 66.5% 33.6%
26 2007 39/40 1.7 2.5 61.7% 68.0% 50.4% 54.4% 41.6% 61.4% 36.8% 2014 45/46 14.4 2.8 60.5% 79.4% 51.9% 73.7% 41.8% 68.7% 33.8%
27 2008 35/38 1.7 2.4 61.5% 64.4% 50.4% 61.9% 42.3% 59.0% 36.2% 2015 44/44 13.8 3.6 59.5% 78.7% 54.4% 64.0% 37.1% 68.9% 33.7%
28 2009 22/22 1.8 1.8 65.0% 67.8% 56.2% 56.9% 49.1% 63.5% 38.8% 2016 51/51 13.1 3.1 58.6% 79.9% 52.3% 59.4% 39.6% 68.5% 33.4%
29 2010 36/36 1.5 2.1 61.9% 64.5% 51.4% 59.1% 43.9% 59.5% 38.2% 2017 55/55 13.5 3.2 57.1% 79.8% 51.8% 62.5% 49.5% 67.9% 37.0%
30 2011 27/27 1.9 2.9 59.2% 66.3% 50.1% 57.5% 35.8% 59.7% 36.3% 2018 43/43 14.3 3.7 58.2% 81.9% 51.7% 60.0% 41.2% 69.3% 34.2%
31 2012 31/32 1.8 2.6 60.7% 66.9% 51.7% 52.6% 43.4% 60.8% 34.7% 2019 41/41 16.8 4.0 62.1% 81.2% 49.4% 60.5% 33.2% 69.1% 33.8%
32 2013 6/6 0.7 1.7 59.2% 65.1% 50.0% 58.8% 43.1% 58.7% 30.3% 2020 9/9 16.8 3.6 60.3% 78.2% 50.8% 33.4% 31.7% 67.5% 31.1%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 25/26 15.2 5.2 56.8% 81.9% 47.7% 52.4% 33.2% 67.3% 30.3%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 14/14 12.4 4.7 58.3% 78.6% 46.1% 56.3% 26.6% 64.8% 29.4%
Career — 461/482 1.7 2.6 61.2% 66.4% 52.0% 57.4% 43.2% 60.8% 37.9% — 684/688 12.9 3.5 59.0% 79.2% 50.9% 61.3% 40.2% 67.6% 34.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Olivier Rochus Sam Querrey
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1490 99.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1542 124.2 +1.62 -2.01 0.962 49.2% -13 — — 46.7% -0.31 1–7 (13%) 2–4 (33%) — -0.03
19 2000 1677 119.0 -0.45 +3.01 1.066 51.4% -130 -26 +6 54.1% +0.41 5–0 (100%) 3–7 (30%) — -0.10 2007 1637 141.5 +2.16 -1.29 0.990 50.0% +50 -158 — 47.6% -0.08 6–8 (43%) 9–10 (47%) — +0.09
20 2001 1571 116.8 -3.32 -1.56 0.830 46.4% -105 +48 +68 36.5% -0.88 2–6 (25%) 4–11 (27%) — -0.37 2008 1779 145.5 +1.02 -0.70 0.993 50.1% +29 -209 -254 51.5% +0.04 11–8 (58%) 9–8 (53%) — +0.64
21 2002 1613 129.1 -2.11 +3.31 1.040 50.9% -63 -2 +83 45.6% -0.32 6–12 (33%) 5–3 (63%) — +0.06 2009 1900 149.0 +4.79 +0.01 1.176 52.3% +27 -361 -223 62.0% +0.61 8–11 (42%) 13–12 (52%) — +1.27
22 2003 1697 137.1 -2.29 +0.22 0.931 48.6% -5 -114 +39 44.6% -0.42 10–7 (59%) 9–10 (47%) — -1.11 2010 1873 152.2 +3.95 -0.55 1.108 51.9% +5 -250 +9 58.4% +0.58 13–11 (54%) 14–17 (45%) — +2.65
23 2004 1701 131.3 -1.59 +1.62 0.996 50.2% +16 -109 -28 46.2% +0.02 6–8 (43%) 4–12 (25%) — -0.73 2011 1817 141.7 +1.37 -1.06 0.989 49.9% +19 -173 +81 46.7% -0.10 3–4 (43%) 4–7 (36%) — +0.50
24 2005 1820 148.2 +0.69 +0.87 1.002 50.2% +20 -217 -72 52.7% +0.22 12–2 (86%) 14–17 (45%) — -2.32 2012 2006 157.4 +4.09 +0.39 1.129 52.1% +3 -305 -92 57.8% +0.40 12–10 (55%) 20–13 (61%) — -0.61
25 2006 1805 150.3 +1.26 +3.53 1.125 52.1% +24 -107 -6 60.0% +0.73 9–12 (43%) 14–10 (58%) — -0.74 2013 1875 153.6 +2.58 -2.07 1.003 50.0% +71 -164 -51 50.0% -0.07 9–8 (53%) 15–15 (50%) — +0.18
26 2007 1716 137.2 -0.83 +1.10 0.955 48.9% +68 -64 -35 43.6% -0.50 6–4 (60%) 5–9 (36%) — -1.36 2014 1896 144.5 +3.69 -2.25 1.080 51.0% +17 -178 -23 56.4% +0.33 6–9 (40%) 12–12 (50%) — +0.27
27 2008 1664 133.8 -2.99 -0.08 0.882 47.9% +51 -44 -7 34.5% -1.18 3–6 (33%) 3–6 (33%) — -2.32 2015 1812 152.4 +3.52 -1.09 1.082 51.0% -39 -68 +110 46.7% -0.02 7–9 (44%) 13–18 (42%) — -2.68
28 2009 1753 132.8 -0.28 +1.87 1.063 51.3% +14 -144 +47 51.8% +0.46 8–1 (89%) 3–3 (50%) — +1.32 2016 1797 152.8 +4.13 -1.97 1.060 50.9% -38 -84 +223 56.0% +0.27 8–9 (47%) 18–16 (53%) — +1.80
29 2010 1677 137.1 -2.69 +1.27 0.943 49.0% +22 -65 +125 44.9% -0.56 4–8 (33%) 4–3 (57%) — -1.41 2017 1945 161.8 +4.11 +1.06 1.153 52.3% -43 -192 +131 59.1% +0.70 11–6 (65%) 14–13 (52%) — +1.92
30 2011 1688 130.3 -1.90 -0.21 0.899 48.1% +17 -84 +179 41.8% -0.82 7–1 (88%) 7–5 (58%) — +0.40 2018 1823 152.3 +4.08 -0.93 1.114 51.7% -5 -127 +252 54.1% +0.58 6–11 (35%) 9–20 (31%) — +1.23
31 2012 1646 138.1 -1.37 -0.92 0.886 47.8% +69 -124 +98 32.9% -1.05 5–8 (38%) 7–10 (41%) — -1.15 2019 1898 146.9 +4.59 -1.49 1.095 51.3% -82 -158 +201 55.6% +0.20 5–5 (50%) 18–15 (55%) — -0.90
32 2013 1672 125.8 -1.18 -1.22 0.734 45.3% +52 — — 15.4% -1.92 1–0 — — -0.66 2020 1818 128.8 +2.33 -0.47 0.956 48.3% -33 — — 37.0% -0.67 1–1 4–3 (57%) — -0.60
33 2014 1631 102.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1690 124.0 +2.41 -3.84 0.926 48.7% -54 — +303 39.1% -0.53 3–5 (38%) 8–8 (50%) — -0.24
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1645 117.4 -0.20 -3.77 0.835 47.4% -72 — +250 28.6% -0.97 2–1 (67%) 2–7 (22%) — +0.03
Career — 1867 141.8 -1.24 +1.03 0.966 49.4% +18 -71 +49 45.6% -0.28 84–75 (53%) 82–106 (44%) 99.2 -2.18 — 2039 155.6 +3.33 -1.02 1.064 51.0% 0 -181 +77 53.2% +0.22 112–123 (48%) 184–198 (48%) 96.0 +0.81

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.