H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Olivier Rochus vs Sjeng Schalken H2H: 1-2
Sjeng Schalken holds a 2–1 lead over Olivier Rochus in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Sjeng Schalken leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sjeng Schalken won the 2003 Rotterdam fourth round 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 45
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
NED
Age 49
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 21, 2003* | Rotterdam | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Sjeng Schalken | 7-5 6-2 | Olivier Rochus | Match data |
| May 2, 2002* | Mallorca | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Olivier Rochus | 6-2 3-6 7-5 | Sjeng Schalken | Match data |
| Jul 21, 2001* | Amsterdam | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Sjeng Schalken | 6-2 2-6 6-1 | Olivier Rochus | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Olivier Rochus | #1,179 | #24 | 1,160 | 1,866 | 220 | 256 | 46.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Sjeng Schalken | #677 | #11 | 1,790 | 1,934 | 280 | 254 | 52.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Olivier Rochus | Sjeng Schalken | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #69 | 1,645 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2000 | 8–4 | 66.7% | #68 | 1,678 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 2001 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #114 | 1,570 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #59 | 1,632 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 2002 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #64 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 22–30 | 42.3% | #66 | 1,592 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2003 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #48 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #44 | 1,744 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 2004 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #66 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #22 | 1,824 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 2005 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #27 | 1,818 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 36–27 | 57.1% | #26 | 1,846 | 0 | 6 |
| 25 | 2006 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #36 | 1,804 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 36–27 | 57.1% | #20 | 1,839 | 0 | 7 |
| 26 | 2007 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #48 | 1,712 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #18 | 1,826 | 0 | 9 |
| 27 | 2008 | 11–24 | 31.4% | #122 | 1,645 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #57 | 1,698 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | 2009 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #57 | 1,751 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #230 | 1,664 | 0 | 9 |
| 29 | 2010 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #113 | 1,676 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2011 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #67 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2012 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #90 | 1,648 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2013 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #201 | 1,673 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |