H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Olivier Rochus vs Thomas Johansson H2H: 0-2
Thomas Johansson holds a 2–0 lead over Olivier Rochus in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Thomas Johansson leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Thomas Johansson won the 2004 Nottingham fourth round 6-4 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 45
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 51
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 18, 2004* | Nottingham | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | Thomas Johansson | 6-4 7-6(5) | Olivier Rochus | Match data |
| Jan 4, 2002* | Chennai | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Thomas Johansson | 4-6 6-3 6-4 | Olivier Rochus | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Olivier Rochus | #1,179 | #24 | 1,160 | 1,866 | 220 | 256 | 46.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Thomas Johansson | #586 | #7 | 2,365 | 1,969 | 336 | 277 | 54.8% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Olivier Rochus | Thomas Johansson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #422 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2000 | 8–4 | 66.7% | #68 | 1,678 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #486 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2001 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #114 | 1,570 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #117 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2002 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #64 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #60 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2003 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #48 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 32–27 | 54.2% | #39 | 1,699 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2004 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #66 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 46–30 | 60.5% | #17 | 1,899 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2005 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #27 | 1,818 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #39 | 1,725 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2006 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #36 | 1,804 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #39 | 1,825 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2007 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #48 | 1,712 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #18 | 1,875 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2008 | 11–24 | 31.4% | #122 | 1,645 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #14 | 1,746 | 1 | 7 |
| 28 | 2009 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #57 | 1,751 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2010 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #113 | 1,676 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #30 | 1,855 | 1 | 8 |
| 30 | 2011 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #67 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 42–24 | 63.6% | #13 | 1,892 | 1 | 9 |
| 31 | 2012 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #90 | 1,648 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #71 | 1,723 | 1 | 9 |
| 32 | 2013 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #201 | 1,673 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #62 | 1,759 | 1 | 9 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #136 | 1,673 | 1 | 9 |