H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Olivier Rochus vs Thomaz Bellucci H2H: 2-1
Olivier Rochus holds a 2–1 lead over Thomaz Bellucci in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Olivier Rochus leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Olivier Rochus won the 2012 Auckland fourth round 7-6(6) 5-7 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 45
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
BRA
Age 38
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 12, 2012* | Auckland | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Olivier Rochus | 7-6(6) 5-7 7-6(5) | Thomaz Bellucci | Match data |
| Mar 29, 2010* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Thomaz Bellucci | 6-3 6-4 | Olivier Rochus | Match data |
| Oct 24, 2009* | Stockholm | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Olivier Rochus | 7-6(4) 4-6 6-3 | Thomaz Bellucci | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Olivier Rochus | #1,179 | #24 | 1,160 | 1,866 | 220 | 256 | 46.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Thomaz Bellucci | #1,303 | #21 | 1,732 | 1,937 | 179 | 201 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Olivier Rochus | Thomaz Bellucci | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2000 | 8–4 | 66.7% | #68 | 1,678 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2001 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #114 | 1,570 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #85 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2002 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #64 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #36 | 1,781 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2003 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #48 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 32–24 | 57.1% | #31 | 1,795 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2004 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #66 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #37 | 1,710 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2005 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #27 | 1,818 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #33 | 1,828 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2006 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #36 | 1,804 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #125 | 1,676 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2007 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #48 | 1,712 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #65 | 1,818 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2008 | 11–24 | 31.4% | #122 | 1,645 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 29–27 | 51.8% | #37 | 1,856 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2009 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #57 | 1,751 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #61 | 1,758 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2010 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #113 | 1,676 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #113 | 1,693 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2011 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #67 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #225 | 1,654 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 2012 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #90 | 1,648 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2013 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #201 | 1,673 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #449 | 1,610 | 0 | 4 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1303 | 1,598 | 0 | 4 |