H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Olivier Rochus vs Tim Henman H2H: 1-0

Olivier Rochus holds a 1–0 lead over Tim Henman in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Olivier Rochus leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Olivier Rochus won the 2003 Hamburg Open round of 16 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Olivier Rochus
BEL Age 45 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Tim Henman
GBR Age 51 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Olivier Rochus #65 6-4 6-3 Tim Henman #27 Match data May 17, 2003* R16 Hamburg Open Masters 1000 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Olivier Rochus #1,179 #24 1,160 1,867 223 259 46.3% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Tim Henman #615 #4 2,826 2,026 469 263 64.1% 0 1 0 1 9 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Olivier Rochus Tim Henman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 2000 8–4 66.7% #68 1,676 0 1 1994 3–5 37.5% #167 1,513 0 0
20 2001 9–19 32.1% #114 1,570 0 1 1995 7–7 50.0% #95 1,571 0 0
21 2002 17–22 43.6% #64 1,613 0 1 1996 38–25 60.3% #29 1,811 0 0
22 2003 24–28 46.2% #48 1,697 0 1 1997 47–23 67.1% #17 1,895 0 2
23 2004 18–22 45.0% #66 1,701 0 1 1998 55–29 65.5% #7 1,960 0 4
24 2005 35–25 58.3% #27 1,819 0 1 1999 41–25 62.1% #12 1,786 0 4
25 2006 30–20 60.0% #36 1,804 0 2 2000 55–24 69.6% #10 1,939 0 6
26 2007 18–22 45.0% #48 1,715 0 2 2001 49–20 71.0% #9 1,922 0 8
27 2008 13–25 34.2% #122 1,664 0 2 2002 45–18 71.4% #8 1,888 0 9
28 2009 13–9 59.1% #57 1,752 0 2 2003 30–16 65.2% #15 1,971 0 11
29 2010 14–22 38.9% #113 1,676 0 2 2004 41–21 66.1% #6 1,914 0 11
30 2011 13–14 48.1% #67 1,687 0 2 2005 23–18 56.1% #36 1,746 0 11
31 2012 9–23 28.1% #90 1,645 0 2 2006 31–20 60.8% #39 1,867 0 11
32 2013 2–4 33.3% #201 1,671 0 2 2007 4–12 25.0% #292 1,683 0 11

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Olivier Rochus Tim Henman
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 2000 1 3 4 25.0% 5 0 5 100.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 1994 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
20 2001 0 7 7 0.0% 7 9 16 43.8% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1995 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3%
21 2002 5 9 14 35.7% 7 9 16 43.8% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 1996 14 12 26 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 17 9 26 65.4%
22 2003 12 11 23 52.2% 4 10 14 28.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 4 8 50.0% 1997 27 11 38 71.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 11 6 17 64.7%
23 2004 9 11 20 45.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1998 40 18 58 69.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 7 2 9 77.8% 5 4 9 55.6%
24 2005 24 13 37 64.9% 3 7 10 30.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1999 16 14 30 53.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 9 4 13 69.2%
25 2006 17 12 29 58.6% 8 4 12 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 2000 41 14 55 74.5% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
26 2007 13 12 25 52.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2001 28 12 40 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 5 1 6 83.3%
27 2008 8 14 22 36.4% 4 8 12 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2002 27 10 37 73.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 3 2 5 60.0%
28 2009 6 5 11 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2003 10 9 19 52.6% 5 4 9 55.6% 7 2 9 77.8% 8 1 9 88.9%
29 2010 6 12 18 33.3% 4 7 11 36.4% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2004 23 13 36 63.9% 11 4 15 73.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0%
30 2011 4 6 10 40.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — 2005 15 11 26 57.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2012 7 12 19 36.8% 0 6 6 0.0% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 2006 19 13 32 59.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 2 6 66.7%
32 2013 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2007 2 6 8 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
Career — 114 130 244 46.7% 56 81 137 40.9% 43 38 81 53.1% 10 10 20 50.0% — 266 147 413 64.4% 56 46 102 54.9% 78 34 112 69.6% 69 36 105 65.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 461/482 of Olivier Rochus's and 644/732 of Tim Henman's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Olivier Rochus Tim Henman
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 2000 9/12 2.8 2.3 63.9% 67.8% 50.2% 63.7% 31.7% 61.5% 41.0% 1994 5/8 3.0 2.6 62.7% 65.7% 41.8% 48.7% 36.9% 56.9% 33.4%
20 2001 26/28 2.0 3.1 57.0% 63.5% 49.3% 43.5% 44.1% 57.3% 35.4% 1995 11/14 3.7 5.0 55.9% 69.5% 47.7% 53.7% 54.6% 60.1% 34.7%
21 2002 31/39 1.8 2.9 56.9% 66.3% 50.4% 55.4% 44.8% 59.0% 42.7% 1996 50/63 7.1 3.7 56.7% 73.9% 51.4% 58.8% 39.0% 64.4% 36.7%
22 2003 51/52 1.5 2.5 61.8% 65.2% 50.1% 52.3% 44.3% 59.2% 38.0% 1997 63/70 8.3 4.8 51.2% 80.7% 50.4% 61.5% 38.9% 65.8% 38.3%
23 2004 38/40 1.4 3.1 61.6% 65.8% 53.4% 60.3% 50.4% 61.2% 38.7% 1998 71/84 7.2 4.1 52.9% 77.8% 50.0% 54.0% 45.5% 64.6% 39.3%
24 2005 60/60 2.0 2.7 61.5% 68.4% 54.5% 63.4% 39.9% 63.2% 36.9% 1999 57/66 7.0 3.8 54.9% 76.7% 50.5% 62.0% 41.3% 64.8% 40.2%
25 2006 50/50 1.8 2.7 63.3% 67.8% 55.1% 61.3% 44.1% 63.1% 41.5% 2000 62/79 7.0 4.1 55.2% 77.1% 50.9% 68.9% 40.4% 65.4% 41.2%
26 2007 39/40 1.7 2.5 61.7% 68.0% 50.4% 54.4% 41.6% 61.4% 36.8% 2001 58/69 4.7 3.1 60.9% 74.3% 53.1% 61.1% 47.4% 66.2% 42.8%
27 2008 35/38 1.7 2.4 61.5% 64.4% 50.4% 61.9% 42.3% 59.0% 36.2% 2002 54/63 3.4 2.2 64.4% 70.8% 52.9% 63.3% 45.7% 64.3% 40.8%
28 2009 22/22 1.8 1.8 65.0% 67.8% 56.2% 56.9% 49.1% 63.5% 38.8% 2003 45/46 4.8 3.7 58.8% 72.7% 51.8% 59.3% 47.9% 64.1% 39.5%
29 2010 36/36 1.5 2.1 61.9% 64.5% 51.4% 59.1% 43.9% 59.5% 38.2% 2004 60/62 6.1 4.1 58.7% 74.2% 55.5% 59.4% 49.0% 66.6% 39.1%
30 2011 27/27 1.9 2.9 59.2% 66.3% 50.1% 57.5% 35.8% 59.7% 36.3% 2005 41/41 4.4 3.3 61.9% 73.8% 52.4% 62.5% 45.6% 65.7% 38.2%
31 2012 31/32 1.8 2.6 60.7% 66.9% 51.7% 52.6% 43.4% 60.8% 34.7% 2006 51/51 4.7 2.3 61.5% 71.5% 51.9% 59.0% 48.7% 63.8% 38.9%
32 2013 6/6 0.7 1.7 59.2% 65.1% 50.0% 58.8% 43.1% 58.7% 30.3% 2007 16/16 7.6 4.3 62.5% 69.6% 51.9% 65.9% 40.5% 62.9% 34.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Olivier Rochus Tim Henman
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 2000 1677 119.0 -0.45 +3.01 1.066 51.4% -130 -26 +6 54.1% +0.41 5–0 (100%) 3–7 (30%) — -0.10 1994 1513 116.8 -1.59 -1.36 0.776 45.4% +47 — +42 40.0% -1.00 1–1 2–0 — -0.33
20 2001 1571 116.8 -3.32 -1.56 0.830 46.4% -105 +48 +68 36.5% -0.88 2–6 (25%) 4–11 (27%) — -0.37 1995 1572 115.6 -2.09 -1.97 0.869 47.8% 0 — +26 45.7% -0.43 2–1 (67%) 4–4 (50%) — -0.04
21 2002 1613 129.1 -2.11 +3.31 1.040 50.9% -63 -2 +83 45.6% -0.32 6–12 (33%) 5–3 (63%) — +0.06 1996 1811 143.5 +1.77 -0.36 1.030 50.5% -28 — -52 58.2% +0.39 8–11 (42%) 24–14 (63%) — -0.81
22 2003 1697 137.1 -2.29 +0.22 0.931 48.6% -5 -114 +39 44.6% -0.42 10–7 (59%) 9–10 (47%) — -1.11 1997 1896 147.8 +3.33 +0.92 1.120 51.9% 0 -414 -26 59.7% +0.52 17–9 (65%) 18–11 (62%) — +0.85
23 2004 1701 131.3 -1.59 +1.62 0.996 50.2% +16 -109 -28 46.2% +0.02 6–8 (43%) 4–12 (25%) — -0.73 1998 1961 159.5 +2.85 +2.23 1.107 52.0% -1 -493 +17 61.8% +0.65 17–12 (59%) 16–10 (62%) — -1.62
24 2005 1820 148.2 +0.69 +0.87 1.002 50.2% +20 -217 -72 52.7% +0.22 12–2 (86%) 14–17 (45%) — -2.32 1999 1787 151.2 +2.50 +2.30 1.142 52.1% -11 -152 +243 58.8% +0.71 13–13 (50%) 14–16 (47%) — +0.72
25 2006 1805 150.3 +1.26 +3.53 1.125 52.1% +24 -107 -6 60.0% +0.73 9–12 (43%) 14–10 (58%) — -0.74 2000 1939 155.2 +3.31 +3.56 1.191 53.1% +29 -234 +63 66.7% +1.07 11–12 (48%) 17–10 (63%) — +0.25
26 2007 1716 137.2 -0.83 +1.10 0.955 48.9% +68 -64 -35 43.6% -0.50 6–4 (60%) 5–9 (36%) — -1.36 2001 1922 152.8 +3.40 +4.67 1.266 54.3% -2 -179 +132 67.0% +1.29 11–12 (48%) 17–14 (55%) — +2.30
27 2008 1664 133.8 -2.99 -0.08 0.882 47.9% +51 -44 -7 34.5% -1.18 3–6 (33%) 3–6 (33%) — -2.32 2002 1888 153.2 +2.14 +3.42 1.145 52.4% +19 -133 +186 66.3% +1.06 14–8 (64%) 9–15 (38%) — +0.21
28 2009 1753 132.8 -0.28 +1.87 1.063 51.3% +14 -144 +47 51.8% +0.46 8–1 (89%) 3–3 (50%) — +1.32 2003 1972 147.0 +1.73 +3.09 1.100 51.8% -9 -200 +151 60.0% +0.66 8–2 (80%) 10–8 (56%) — -2.72
29 2010 1677 137.1 -2.69 +1.27 0.943 49.0% +22 -65 +125 44.9% -0.56 4–8 (33%) 4–3 (57%) — -1.41 2004 1914 154.9 +3.57 +2.65 1.174 52.8% +17 -34 +142 60.8% +0.86 11–7 (61%) 12–18 (40%) — +0.11
30 2011 1688 130.3 -1.90 -0.21 0.899 48.1% +17 -84 +179 41.8% -0.82 7–1 (88%) 7–5 (58%) — +0.40 2005 1746 146.2 +2.43 +1.53 1.114 51.8% +62 +91 +293 55.6% +0.50 6–8 (43%) 6–8 (43%) — +0.77
31 2012 1646 138.1 -1.37 -0.92 0.886 47.8% +69 -124 +98 32.9% -1.05 5–8 (38%) 7–10 (41%) — -1.15 2006 1868 152.1 +1.77 +2.07 1.076 51.4% -18 -56 +205 59.5% +0.54 5–8 (38%) 10–7 (59%) — -2.94
32 2013 1672 125.8 -1.18 -1.22 0.734 45.3% +52 — — 15.4% -1.92 1–0 — — -0.66 2007 1684 119.8 -0.80 -0.33 0.931 49.2% +55 +34 +277 40.0% -0.34 1–8 (11%) 2–6 (25%) — +0.06
33 2014 1631 102.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1867 141.8 -1.24 +1.03 0.966 49.4% +18 -71 +49 45.6% -0.28 84–75 (53%) 82–106 (44%) 99.2 -2.18 — 2026 155.9 +2.48 +2.23 1.121 52.1% +5 -155 +114 60.6% +0.70 125–112 (53%) 161–141 (53%) 96.1 -0.44

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.