H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Olivier Rochus vs Tommy Haas H2H: 1-3

Tommy Haas holds a 3–1 lead over Olivier Rochus in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Tommy Haas leads 3–0 on hard courts, while Olivier Rochus leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Olivier Rochus won the 2008 Monte Carlo Masters second round 6-1 3-0 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Olivier Rochus
BEL Age 45 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1 – 3
4 main draw meetings
Tommy Haas
GER Age 48 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 22, 2008* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Olivier Rochus #78 6-1 3-0 (ret.) Tommy Haas #35 Match data
Oct 10, 2007* Stockholm ATP 250 R32 Hard Tommy Haas #12 6-4 6-1 Olivier Rochus #51 Match data
Mar 3, 2007* Dubai ATP 500 QF Hard Tommy Haas #9 6-0 6-2 Olivier Rochus #34 Match data
Oct 30, 2004* Stockholm ATP 250 QF Hard Tommy Haas #22 6-3 7-6(4) Olivier Rochus #75 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Olivier Rochus #1,179 #24 1,160 1,866 220 256 46.2% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Tommy Haas #616 #2 3,030 2,103 533 330 61.8% 0 1 0 3 11 15

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Olivier Rochus Tommy Haas
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1996 4–3 57.1% #170 1,587 0 0
19 2000 8–4 66.7% #68 1,678 0 1 1997 22–17 56.4% #45 1,721 0 0
20 2001 9–19 32.1% #114 1,570 0 1 1998 34–26 56.7% #34 1,840 0 0
21 2002 17–22 43.6% #64 1,614 0 1 1999 45–23 66.2% #11 1,859 0 1
22 2003 24–28 46.2% #48 1,697 0 1 2000 27–20 57.4% #23 1,777 0 1
23 2004 17–21 44.7% #66 1,690 0 1 2001 53–21 71.6% #8 2,009 0 5
24 2005 35–25 58.3% #27 1,818 0 1 2002 43–22 66.2% #11 1,849 0 5
25 2006 30–20 60.0% #36 1,804 0 2 — — — — — — —
26 2007 18–22 45.0% #48 1,712 0 2 2004 35–18 66.0% #17 1,909 0 7
27 2008 11–24 31.4% #122 1,645 0 2 2005 28–21 57.1% #45 1,766 0 7
28 2009 13–9 59.1% #57 1,751 0 2 2006 48–19 71.6% #11 1,893 0 10
29 2010 14–22 38.9% #113 1,676 0 2 2007 36–17 67.9% #12 1,892 0 11
30 2011 13–14 48.1% #67 1,687 0 2 2008 18–15 54.5% #82 1,855 0 11
31 2012 9–22 29.0% #90 1,648 0 2 2009 31–18 63.3% #18 1,913 0 12
32 2013 2–4 33.3% #201 1,673 0 2 2010 3–4 42.9% #372 1,844 0 12
33 — — — — — — — 2011 7–12 36.8% #205 1,762 0 12
34 — — — — — — — 2012 31–17 64.6% #21 1,966 0 13
35 — — — — — — — 2013 46–23 66.7% #12 2,011 0 15
36 — — — — — — — 2014 14–11 56.0% #77 1,904 0 15
37 — — — — — — — 2015 2–9 18.2% #470 1,784 0 15
39 — — — — — — — 2017 6–14 30.0% #252 1,686 0 15