H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Olivier Rochus vs Tommy Haas H2H: 1-3

Tommy Haas holds a 3–1 lead over Olivier Rochus in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Tommy Haas leads 3–0 on hard courts, while Olivier Rochus leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Olivier Rochus won the 2008 Monte-Carlo Masters first round 6-1 3-0 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Olivier Rochus
BEL Age 45 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1 – 3
4 main draw meetings
Tommy Haas
GER Age 48 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Olivier Rochus #78 6-1 3-0 (ret.) Tommy Haas #35 Match data Apr 22, 2008* R64 Monte-Carlo Masters Masters 1000 Clay
Tommy Haas #12 6-4 6-1 Olivier Rochus #51 Match data Oct 10, 2007* R32 Stockholm Open International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Tommy Haas #9 6-0 6-2 Olivier Rochus #34 Match data Mar 3, 2007* QF Dubai Tennis Championships International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard
Tommy Haas #22 6-3 7-6(4) Olivier Rochus #75 Match data Oct 30, 2004* QF Stockholm Open International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Olivier Rochus #1,179 #24 1,160 1,867 223 259 46.3% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Tommy Haas #616 #2 3,030 2,116 540 333 61.9% 0 1 0 4 10 15

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Olivier Rochus Tommy Haas
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1996 4–3 57.1% #170 1,588 0 0
19 2000 8–4 66.7% #68 1,676 0 1 1997 22–17 56.4% #45 1,722 0 0
20 2001 9–19 32.1% #114 1,570 0 1 1998 34–26 56.7% #34 1,820 0 0
21 2002 17–22 43.6% #64 1,613 0 1 1999 45–23 66.2% #11 1,833 0 1
22 2003 24–28 46.2% #48 1,697 0 1 2000 32–21 60.4% #23 1,813 0 1
23 2004 18–22 45.0% #66 1,701 0 1 2001 53–21 71.6% #8 2,011 0 5
24 2005 35–25 58.3% #27 1,819 0 1 2002 43–22 66.2% #11 1,863 0 5
25 2006 30–20 60.0% #36 1,804 0 2 — — — — — — —
26 2007 18–22 45.0% #48 1,715 0 2 2004 36–19 65.5% #17 1,916 0 7
27 2008 13–25 34.2% #122 1,664 0 2 2005 28–21 57.1% #45 1,767 0 7
28 2009 13–9 59.1% #57 1,752 0 2 2006 48–19 71.6% #11 1,892 0 10
29 2010 14–22 38.9% #113 1,676 0 2 2007 36–17 67.9% #12 1,894 0 11
30 2011 13–14 48.1% #67 1,687 0 2 2008 18–15 54.5% #82 1,857 0 11
31 2012 9–23 28.1% #90 1,645 0 2 2009 31–18 63.3% #18 1,940 0 12
32 2013 2–4 33.3% #201 1,671 0 2 2010 3–4 42.9% #372 1,865 0 12
33 — — — — — — — 2011 7–12 36.8% #205 1,771 0 12
34 — — — — — — — 2012 31–17 64.6% #21 1,975 0 13
35 — — — — — — — 2013 47–24 66.2% #12 2,024 0 15
36 — — — — — — — 2014 14–11 56.0% #77 1,911 0 15
37 — — — — — — — 2015 2–9 18.2% #470 1,788 0 15
39 — — — — — — — 2017 6–14 30.0% #252 1,689 0 15

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Olivier Rochus Tommy Haas
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2000 1 3 4 25.0% 5 0 5 100.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 1997 10 8 18 55.6% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6%
20 2001 0 7 7 0.0% 7 9 16 43.8% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1998 18 15 33 54.5% 6 6 12 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 7 3 10 70.0%
21 2002 5 9 14 35.7% 7 9 16 43.8% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 1999 25 12 37 67.6% 11 6 17 64.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
22 2003 12 11 23 52.2% 4 10 14 28.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 4 8 50.0% 2000 18 9 27 66.7% 10 7 17 58.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
23 2004 9 11 20 45.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2001 41 12 53 77.4% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 2 8 75.0%
24 2005 24 13 37 64.9% 3 7 10 30.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 2002 25 14 39 64.1% 17 7 24 70.8% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
25 2006 17 12 29 58.6% 8 4 12 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2007 13 12 25 52.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2004 24 11 35 68.6% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
27 2008 8 14 22 36.4% 4 8 12 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2005 15 12 27 55.6% 7 5 12 58.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
28 2009 6 5 11 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2006 34 10 44 77.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 2 6 66.7%
29 2010 6 12 18 33.3% 4 7 11 36.4% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2007 31 13 44 70.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
30 2011 4 6 10 40.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — 2008 15 11 26 57.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
31 2012 7 12 19 36.8% 0 6 6 0.0% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 2009 15 14 29 51.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 10 1 11 90.9% — — — —
32 2013 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2010 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 6 8 14 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 16 12 28 57.1% 10 4 14 71.4% 5 1 6 83.3% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 28 15 43 65.1% 14 7 21 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 7 6 13 53.8% 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 0 3 3 0.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
Career — 114 130 244 46.7% 56 81 137 40.9% 43 38 81 53.1% 10 10 20 50.0% — 335 197 532 63.0% 117 82 199 58.8% 57 34 91 62.6% 31 20 51 60.8%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 461/482 of Olivier Rochus's and 805/873 of Tommy Haas's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Olivier Rochus Tommy Haas
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1996 7/7 3.7 3.9 53.5% 70.9% 59.6% 71.3% 67.6% 65.3% 36.7%
19 2000 9/12 2.8 2.3 63.9% 67.8% 50.2% 63.7% 31.7% 61.5% 41.0% 1997 36/39 5.5 3.8 59.8% 71.0% 49.5% 55.1% 44.9% 62.5% 38.5%
20 2001 26/28 2.0 3.1 57.0% 63.5% 49.3% 43.5% 44.1% 57.3% 35.4% 1998 51/60 4.9 4.1 58.9% 71.1% 48.0% 55.1% 44.2% 61.3% 39.1%
21 2002 31/39 1.8 2.9 56.9% 66.3% 50.4% 55.4% 44.8% 59.0% 42.7% 1999 54/68 8.4 5.6 53.0% 76.3% 50.6% 62.2% 43.2% 64.2% 35.9%
22 2003 51/52 1.5 2.5 61.8% 65.2% 50.1% 52.3% 44.3% 59.2% 38.0% 2000 39/53 7.0 4.4 54.3% 74.2% 51.0% 59.5% 43.0% 63.5% 35.9%
23 2004 38/40 1.4 3.1 61.6% 65.8% 53.4% 60.3% 50.4% 61.2% 38.7% 2001 62/74 7.7 3.9 56.4% 76.7% 52.4% 64.4% 42.5% 66.0% 39.7%
24 2005 60/60 2.0 2.7 61.5% 68.4% 54.5% 63.4% 39.9% 63.2% 36.9% 2002 58/65 8.8 4.8 56.0% 75.4% 52.7% 61.9% 39.6% 65.5% 37.1%
25 2006 50/50 1.8 2.7 63.3% 67.8% 55.1% 61.3% 44.1% 63.1% 41.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2007 39/40 1.7 2.5 61.7% 68.0% 50.4% 54.4% 41.6% 61.4% 36.8% 2004 53/55 5.9 3.4 57.9% 75.9% 52.0% 57.3% 46.4% 65.7% 39.2%
27 2008 35/38 1.7 2.4 61.5% 64.4% 50.4% 61.9% 42.3% 59.0% 36.2% 2005 49/49 6.7 3.6 57.8% 74.3% 52.7% 52.9% 43.6% 65.2% 37.8%
28 2009 22/22 1.8 1.8 65.0% 67.8% 56.2% 56.9% 49.1% 63.5% 38.8% 2006 67/67 7.1 3.2 61.0% 76.4% 54.5% 60.1% 40.2% 67.9% 38.3%
29 2010 36/36 1.5 2.1 61.9% 64.5% 51.4% 59.1% 43.9% 59.5% 38.2% 2007 52/53 8.0 3.0 60.6% 78.1% 55.6% 61.9% 43.3% 69.0% 38.7%
30 2011 27/27 1.9 2.9 59.2% 66.3% 50.1% 57.5% 35.8% 59.7% 36.3% 2008 32/33 7.3 3.8 59.4% 72.6% 52.0% 62.8% 40.9% 64.3% 38.1%
31 2012 31/32 1.8 2.6 60.7% 66.9% 51.7% 52.6% 43.4% 60.8% 34.7% 2009 48/49 9.1 4.9 60.2% 77.6% 53.0% 65.4% 44.8% 67.7% 35.3%
32 2013 6/6 0.7 1.7 59.2% 65.1% 50.0% 58.8% 43.1% 58.7% 30.3% 2010 7/7 9.9 4.6 60.9% 72.3% 50.5% 65.2% 38.4% 63.4% 35.1%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 19/19 7.8 4.3 59.9% 70.7% 51.7% 60.5% 43.6% 62.9% 34.9%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 47/48 6.2 3.4 59.6% 75.7% 53.9% 65.6% 43.9% 66.9% 39.1%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 68/71 6.1 3.3 61.3% 74.8% 54.0% 63.0% 41.1% 66.6% 37.8%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 25/25 4.6 2.0 63.7% 72.2% 53.8% 56.5% 49.5% 65.3% 36.9%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 11/11 4.0 4.7 62.5% 70.1% 50.4% 52.3% 31.9% 62.8% 31.0%
39 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 20/20 4.8 4.1 61.9% 68.9% 54.0% 61.4% 29.9% 63.1% 31.7%
Career — 461/482 1.7 2.6 61.2% 66.4% 52.0% 57.4% 43.2% 60.8% 37.9% — 805/873 6.9 3.9 58.7% 74.7% 52.5% 60.6% 42.7% 65.5% 37.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Olivier Rochus Tommy Haas
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1588 144.9 +0.04 +2.74 1.057 51.8% +30 — — 58.8% +0.77 0–1 2–0 — -0.78
19 2000 1677 119.0 -0.45 +3.01 1.066 51.4% -130 -26 +6 54.1% +0.41 5–0 (100%) 3–7 (30%) — -0.10 1997 1723 139.6 +1.11 +0.51 1.027 50.7% -2 -80 -102 54.9% +0.37 9–8 (53%) 4–2 (67%) — +0.37
20 2001 1571 116.8 -3.32 -1.56 0.830 46.4% -105 +48 +68 36.5% -0.88 2–6 (25%) 4–11 (27%) — -0.37 1998 1821 150.9 +0.55 +1.94 1.010 50.5% -13 -133 -149 51.4% +0.19 10–6 (63%) 10–9 (53%) — -2.69
21 2002 1613 129.1 -2.11 +3.31 1.040 50.9% -63 -2 +83 45.6% -0.32 6–12 (33%) 5–3 (63%) — +0.06 1999 1833 148.8 +1.86 -1.09 1.003 50.2% +21 -62 -115 60.7% +0.62 13–7 (65%) 20–19 (51%) — +0.33
22 2003 1697 137.1 -2.29 +0.22 0.931 48.6% -5 -114 +39 44.6% -0.42 10–7 (59%) 9–10 (47%) — -1.11 2000 1814 145.1 +1.31 -0.68 0.983 49.9% +30 -33 -96 53.0% +0.31 14–3 (82%) 9–10 (47%) — -0.61
23 2004 1701 131.3 -1.59 +1.62 0.996 50.2% +16 -109 -28 46.2% +0.02 6–8 (43%) 4–12 (25%) — -0.73 2001 2012 160.6 +4.03 +2.88 1.170 52.7% +26 -246 -364 67.6% +1.30 17–3 (85%) 13–18 (42%) — -1.10
24 2005 1820 148.2 +0.69 +0.87 1.002 50.2% +20 -217 -72 52.7% +0.22 12–2 (86%) 14–17 (45%) — -2.32 2002 1863 149.4 +3.04 +0.31 1.074 51.4% +35 +17 — 62.0% +0.66 19–7 (73%) 17–11 (61%) — +1.60
25 2006 1805 150.3 +1.26 +3.53 1.125 52.1% +24 -107 -6 60.0% +0.73 9–12 (43%) 14–10 (58%) — -0.74 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2007 1716 137.2 -0.83 +1.10 0.955 48.9% +68 -64 -35 43.6% -0.50 6–4 (60%) 5–9 (36%) — -1.36 2004 1917 153.9 +3.05 +2.94 1.143 52.4% +36 -67 -248 60.3% +0.68 10–5 (67%) 9–10 (47%) — -2.50
27 2008 1664 133.8 -2.99 -0.08 0.882 47.9% +51 -44 -7 34.5% -1.18 3–6 (33%) 3–6 (33%) — -2.32 2005 1767 138.3 +1.76 +0.90 1.088 51.1% +34 +44 -63 58.6% +0.48 4–8 (33%) 14–5 (74%) — +0.64
28 2009 1753 132.8 -0.28 +1.87 1.063 51.3% +14 -144 +47 51.8% +0.46 8–1 (89%) 3–3 (50%) — +1.32 2006 1892 153.4 +4.99 +1.83 1.194 52.7% +57 -145 -124 69.5% +1.12 13–8 (62%) 17–10 (63%) — +0.81
29 2010 1677 137.1 -2.69 +1.27 0.943 49.0% +22 -65 +125 44.9% -0.56 4–8 (33%) 4–3 (57%) — -1.41 2007 1894 152.7 +4.56 +2.83 1.249 53.6% +31 -196 -35 65.2% +1.02 8–6 (57%) 11–6 (65%) — +2.11
30 2011 1688 130.3 -1.90 -0.21 0.899 48.1% +17 -84 +179 41.8% -0.82 7–1 (88%) 7–5 (58%) — +0.40 2008 1858 140.5 +1.47 +1.79 1.068 51.1% +30 — +20 54.8% +0.26 8–7 (53%) 6–7 (46%) — -0.96
31 2012 1646 138.1 -1.37 -0.92 0.886 47.8% +69 -124 +98 32.9% -1.05 5–8 (38%) 7–10 (41%) — -1.15 2009 1941 151.0 +3.54 -0.13 1.093 51.7% -108 -141 +173 61.2% +0.76 10–6 (63%) 15–13 (54%) — -1.53
32 2013 1672 125.8 -1.18 -1.22 0.734 45.3% +52 — — 15.4% -1.92 1–0 — — -0.66 2010 1866 115.9 -0.81 -0.45 0.960 49.6% -85 — — 45.5% -0.05 1–1 1–3 (25%) — +0.43
33 2014 1631 102.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1772 128.1 -0.01 -0.99 0.941 48.9% +11 — +215 45.1% -0.23 2–4 (33%) 8–6 (57%) — +1.11
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1975 163.7 +4.25 +2.56 1.182 52.7% -70 -48 +106 61.9% +0.71 7–7 (50%) 11–5 (69%) — -1.93
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 2024 167.7 +3.58 +2.30 1.133 52.1% -25 +9 +118 65.3% +0.87 13–8 (62%) 16–10 (62%) — -1.12
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1911 147.8 +1.08 +0.76 1.066 51.1% +26 +47 — 58.8% +0.77 7–2 (78%) 5–2 (71%) — +1.30
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1788 121.7 -0.85 -1.47 0.835 47.3% +57 — +212 32.3% -1.23 0–3 (0%) 4–3 (57%) — -0.82
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1689 129.1 -1.47 -2.29 0.859 47.7% +75 +108 +206 36.0% -0.80 5–5 (50%) 6–3 (67%) — -0.60
Career — 1867 141.8 -1.24 +1.03 0.966 49.4% +18 -71 +49 45.6% -0.28 84–75 (53%) 82–106 (44%) 99.2 -2.18 — 2117 158.2 +2.62 +1.22 1.087 51.5% +10 -44 +3 59.5% +0.62 170–105 (62%) 198–152 (57%) 109.2 -0.69

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.