H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Olivier Rochus vs Yevgeny Kafelnikov H2H: 1-2
Yevgeny Kafelnikov holds a 2–1 lead over Olivier Rochus in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Yevgeny Kafelnikov leads 2–0 on clay, while Olivier Rochus leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Yevgeny Kafelnikov won the 2003 Munich third round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 45
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 52
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2003* | Munich | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Yevgeny Kafelnikov | 6-3 6-2 | Olivier Rochus | Match data |
| Feb 13, 2003* | Marseille | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Olivier Rochus | 7-6(5) 6-4 | Yevgeny Kafelnikov | Match data |
| Jun 3, 2001* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Yevgeny Kafelnikov | 7-6(1) 6-4 6-3 | Olivier Rochus | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Olivier Rochus | #1,179 | #24 | 1,160 | 1,866 | 220 | 256 | 46.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Yevgeny Kafelnikov | #636 | #1 | 3,917 | 2,071 | 568 | 281 | 66.9% | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 23 | 25 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Olivier Rochus | Yevgeny Kafelnikov | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #275 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2000 | 8–4 | 66.7% | #68 | 1,678 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #102 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2001 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #114 | 1,570 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 60–27 | 69.0% | #11 | 1,888 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 2002 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #64 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 69–27 | 71.9% | #6 | 1,875 | 0 | 7 |
| 22 | 2003 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #48 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 73–25 | 74.5% | #3 | 1,972 | 1 | 11 |
| 23 | 2004 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #66 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 54–26 | 67.5% | #5 | 1,955 | 1 | 14 |
| 24 | 2005 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #27 | 1,818 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 55–29 | 65.5% | #11 | 1,950 | 1 | 17 |
| 25 | 2006 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #36 | 1,804 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 59–29 | 67.0% | #2 | 1,922 | 2 | 20 |
| 26 | 2007 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #48 | 1,712 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 58–31 | 65.2% | #5 | 1,859 | 2 | 21 |
| 27 | 2008 | 11–24 | 31.4% | #122 | 1,645 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 64–26 | 71.1% | #4 | 1,979 | 2 | 23 |
| 28 | 2009 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #57 | 1,751 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #27 | 1,809 | 2 | 25 |
| 29 | 2010 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #113 | 1,676 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 29–24 | 54.7% | #41 | 1,708 | 2 | 25 |
| 30 | 2011 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #67 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2012 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #90 | 1,648 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2013 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #201 | 1,673 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |