H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC
Omar Camporese vs Guillaume Raoux H2H: 1-0
Omar Camporese holds a 1–0 lead over Guillaume Raoux in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Omar Camporese leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Omar Camporese won the 1992 US Open first round 6-4 7-6(5) 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 58
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 56
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 1992* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Omar Camporese | 6-4 7-6(5) 6-1 | Guillaume Raoux | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Omar Camporese | #1,381 | #18 | 1,253 | 1,915 | 137 | 146 | 48.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Guillaume Raoux | #1,033 | #35 | 1,041 | 1,806 | 175 | 222 | 44.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Omar Camporese | Guillaume Raoux | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1986 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #766 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #448 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1987 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #283 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #220 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1988 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #216 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #84 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1989 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #49 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 14–25 | 35.9% | #104 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1990 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #45 | 1,731 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #93 | 1,619 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1991 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #24 | 1,788 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 27–28 | 49.1% | #85 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1992 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #42 | 1,696 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #115 | 1,572 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1993 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #111 | 1,653 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #77 | 1,566 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1994 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #244 | 1,521 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #72 | 1,630 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1995 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #120 | 1,598 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #47 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1996 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #127 | 1,555 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #53 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1997 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #336 | 1,503 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #137 | 1,577 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #524 | 1,486 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #668 | 1,553 | 0 | 1 |