H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC

Omar Camporese vs Jeff Tarango H2H: 2-0

Omar Camporese holds a 2–0 lead over Jeff Tarango in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Omar Camporese leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Omar Camporese won the 1996 Rotterdam third round 7-6(4) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Omar Camporese
ITA Age 58 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Jeff Tarango
USA Age 57 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 7, 1996* Rotterdam ATP 250 R32 Carpet Omar Camporese #142 7-6(4) 6-3 Jeff Tarango #84 Match data
Jan 9, 1992* Sydney Outdoor ATP 250 R32 Hard Omar Camporese #25 7-5 2-6 7-6(3) Jeff Tarango #71 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Omar Camporese #1,381 #18 1,253 1,915 137 146 48.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Jeff Tarango #1,001 #42 877 1,787 239 293 44.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Omar Camporese Jeff Tarango
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1986 0–2 0.0% #766 1,476 0 0 1987 1–2 33.3% #377 1,507 0 0
19 1987 1–3 25.0% #283 1,451 0 0 1988 7–6 53.8% #96 1,598 0 0
20 1988 4–7 36.4% #216 1,469 0 0 1989 10–11 47.6% #137 1,647 0 0
21 1989 15–14 51.7% #49 1,600 0 0 1990 11–17 39.3% #131 1,606 0 0
22 1990 28–21 57.1% #45 1,731 0 0 1991 16–23 41.0% #106 1,612 0 0
23 1991 36–25 59.0% #24 1,788 0 1 1992 28–24 53.8% #45 1,694 0 2
24 1992 26–22 54.2% #42 1,696 0 2 1993 24–26 48.0% #91 1,670 0 2
25 1993 12–12 50.0% #111 1,653 0 2 1994 23–27 46.0% #78 1,654 0 2
26 1994 3–14 17.6% #244 1,521 0 2 1995 18–24 42.9% #76 1,661 0 2
27 1995 6–4 60.0% #120 1,598 0 2 1996 14–18 43.8% #106 1,620 0 2
28 1996 5–13 27.8% #127 1,555 0 2 1997 31–29 51.7% #49 1,692 0 2
29 1997 1–8 11.1% #336 1,503 0 2 1998 24–29 45.3% #73 1,660 0 2
30 1998 0–1 0.0% #524 1,486 0 2 1999 21–24 46.7% #55 1,685 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 2000 10–24 29.4% #112 1,515 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2001 1–8 11.1% #323 1,452 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2002 0–1 0.0% #730 1,446 0 2