Omar Camporese
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ronald Agenor | 4 | 2 | 6 | Oct 15, 1992 | H2H |
| Emilio Sanchez | 0 | 5 | 5 | Apr 21, 1993 | H2H |
| Ivan Lendl | 2 | 3 | 5 | May 7, 1992 | H2H |
| Karel Novacek | 3 | 2 | 5 | Feb 21, 1992 | H2H |
| Cedric Pioline | 1 | 3 | 4 | Apr 23, 1997 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-08 00:00 UTC
Omar Camporese vs Martin Damm Sr H2H: 1-1
Omar Camporese and Martin Damm Sr are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Omar Camporese leads 1–0 on carpet, while Martin Damm Sr leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Omar Camporese won the 1992 Bolzano round of 16 7-6(5) 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
1
–
1
2 main-draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Omar Camporese | 7-6(5) 7-6(4) | Martin Damm Sr | Match data | Oct 16, 1992* | R16 | Bolzano | ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Carpet |
| Martin Damm Sr | 4-6 7-5 6-2 | Omar Camporese | Match data | Aug 19, 1992* | R64 | New Haven | ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Omar Camporese | #1,381 | #18 | 1,253 | 1,916 | 138 | 148 | 48.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Martin Damm Sr | — | — | — | 1,731 | — | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Omar Camporese | Martin Damm Sr | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1986 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #766 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1987 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #283 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1988 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #216 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1989 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #49 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1990 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #45 | 1,731 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1991 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #24 | 1,788 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #42 | 1,695 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #111 | 1,653 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1994 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #244 | 1,521 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1995 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #120 | 1,598 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1996 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #127 | 1,554 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1997 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #336 | 1,503 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #524 | 1,486 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Surface Results by Career Season
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Omar Camporese | Martin Damm Sr | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | ||
| 1986 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1987 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1988 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% |
| 1989 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 11 | 6 | 17 | 64.7% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1992 | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 1990 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 26 | 14 | 40 | 65.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 1993 | 7 | 11 | 18 | 38.9% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% |
| 1991 | 12 | 6 | 18 | 66.7% | 11 | 12 | 23 | 47.8% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 10 | 5 | 15 | 66.7% | 1994 | 7 | 12 | 19 | 36.8% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% |
| 1992 | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | 7 | 9 | 16 | 43.8% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | 1995 | 7 | 13 | 20 | 35.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% |
| 1993 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 1996 | 15 | 13 | 28 | 53.6% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 13 | 10 | 23 | 56.5% |
| 1994 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | 1997 | 10 | 13 | 23 | 43.5% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% |
| 1995 | — | — | — | — | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 1998 | 10 | 14 | 24 | 41.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% |
| 1996 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 9 | 11 | 18.2% | — | — | — | — | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 1999 | 5 | 9 | 14 | 35.7% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 1997 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 6 | 6 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2000 | 6 | 11 | 17 | 35.3% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 1998 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 30 | 27 | 57 | 52.6% | 68 | 79 | 147 | 46.3% | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% | 35 | 34 | 69 | 50.7% | Career | 74 | 107 | 181 | 40.9% | 6 | 28 | 34 | 17.6% | 22 | 24 | 46 | 47.8% | 51 | 49 | 100 | 51.0% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Omar Camporese | Martin Damm Sr | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule |
| 1986 | 1477 | 100.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.0% | -1.80 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.12 | 1989 | 1492 | 98.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -5.00 | — | — | — | -0.08 |
| 1987 | 1451 | 101.1 | — | — | — | — | — | +35 | — | 40.0% | -0.90 | 0–2 | — | — | +0.80 | 1990 | 1478 | 98.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | — | — | +0.15 |
| 1988 | 1465 | 110.6 | — | — | — | — | +33 | +47 | — | 33.3% | -1.59 | 0–1 | 2–1 (67%) | — | +0.70 | 1991 | 1504 | 104.7 | — | — | — | — | +57 | — | — | 57.1% | +0.57 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | +0.21 |
| 1989 | 1600 | 137.2 | — | — | — | — | -99 | +92 | -48 | 51.3% | -0.05 | 5–6 (45%) | 6–2 (75%) | 104.5 | +0.08 | 1992 | 1546 | 125.4 | — | — | — | — | +65 | -88 | — | 35.1% | -0.91 | 4–1 (80%) | 2–5 (29%) | 103.3 | +0.26 |
| 1990 | 1732 | 145.4 | — | — | — | — | -236 | +86 | — | 56.3% | +0.55 | 7–7 (50%) | 4–10 (29%) | 96.0 | +0.42 | 1993 | 1647 | 128.4 | — | — | — | — | +28 | -196 | — | 44.8% | -0.40 | 6–6 (50%) | 8–5 (62%) | 105.4 | +0.61 |
| 1991 | 1789 | 147.8 | +2.10 | +0.74 | 1.068 | 51.2% | +27 | -56 | -178 | 55.9% | +0.50 | 13–10 (57%) | 11–12 (48%) | 105.5 | +1.37 | 1994 | 1630 | 133.5 | — | — | — | — | -23 | -172 | +21 | 44.4% | -0.32 | 3–13 (19%) | 9–10 (47%) | 92.4 | -0.61 |
| 1992 | 1695 | 139.7 | +0.73 | -0.60 | 0.989 | 50.1% | +69 | -14 | — | 51.9% | +0.11 | 13–10 (57%) | 11–8 (58%) | 102.0 | +0.08 | 1995 | 1619 | 133.0 | — | — | — | — | +8 | — | — | 42.3% | -0.55 | 9–8 (53%) | 11–11 (50%) | 102.9 | -0.27 |
| 1993 | 1653 | 133.3 | +1.45 | -0.77 | 1.048 | 51.1% | +97 | -17 | — | 48.3% | +0.02 | 5–3 (63%) | 5–5 (50%) | 101.1 | +1.06 | 1996 | 1709 | 139.5 | — | — | — | — | +35 | — | -23 | 47.9% | -0.08 | 13–8 (62%) | 13–18 (42%) | 102.9 | +1.26 |
| 1994 | 1521 | 106.9 | -1.61 | -3.65 | 0.769 | 45.6% | +112 | +47 | +53 | 26.8% | -1.29 | 1–4 (20%) | 0–6 (0%) | 90.3 | +0.43 | 1997 | 1694 | 135.4 | — | — | — | — | +35 | -281 | +7 | 48.3% | -0.18 | 8–7 (53%) | 16–10 (62%) | 105.2 | +0.62 |
| 1995 | 1598 | 121.9 | +1.20 | -1.20 | 1.033 | 50.8% | +64 | +16 | — | 57.7% | +0.08 | 3–3 (50%) | 6–1 (86%) | 103.9 | +0.49 | 1998 | 1649 | 132.2 | — | — | — | — | +16 | — | +23 | 42.9% | -0.50 | 7–7 (50%) | 8–11 (42%) | 98.6 | -0.31 |
| 1996 | 1555 | 122.8 | -1.50 | -1.75 | 0.797 | 46.1% | +127 | -40 | — | 35.0% | -1.12 | 0–4 (0%) | 3–0 (100%) | 96.9 | -0.83 | 1999 | 1578 | 123.5 | — | — | — | — | +27 | -177 | +52 | 39.1% | -0.78 | 1–7 (13%) | 3–5 (38%) | 90.9 | -0.57 |
| 1997 | 1504 | 114.1 | -0.39 | -2.74 | 0.693 | 44.0% | +161 | -20 | — | 15.8% | -2.32 | 0–1 | 2–0 | — | -0.56 | 2000 | 1615 | 127.5 | — | — | — | — | -72 | -159 | +102 | 44.2% | -0.34 | 7–3 (70%) | 6–9 (40%) | 105.2 | +0.30 |
| 1998 | 1487 | 97.9 | -0.73 | -0.91 | 0.695 | 43.9% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.00 | — | — | — | +0.21 | 2001 | 1514 | 96.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | +91 | 15.0% | -1.90 | — | 0–2 | — | +0.77 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 1525 | 111.4 | — | — | — | — | +15 | — | — | 37.5% | -0.75 | — | 1–1 | — | -0.13 |
| Career | 1917 | 141.7 | +0.85 | -0.68 | 0.969 | 49.6% | +34 | +25 | -80 | 48.8% | -0.06 | 47–52 (47%) | 50–46 (52%) | 100.7 | +1.53 | Career | 1732 | 136.6 | — | — | — | — | +17 | -170 | +36 | 43.3% | -0.43 | 59–60 (50%) | 77–88 (47%) | 101.6 | +0.62 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Martin Damm Sr
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cedric Pioline | 2 | 7 | 9 | Jun 23, 1999 | — |
| Patrick Rafter | 1 | 7 | 8 | Jun 24, 2000 | — |
| Thomas Johansson | 3 | 4 | 7 | May 4, 2000 | — |
| Byron Black | 2 | 5 | 7 | Aug 18, 1999 | — |
| Goran Ivanisevic | 0 | 5 | 5 | Jan 16, 2002 | — |