H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Onny Parun vs Ion Tiriac H2H: 2-1
Onny Parun holds a 2–1 lead over Ion Tiriac in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Onny Parun leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Onny Parun won the 1974 London Wct third round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NZL
Age 79
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
ROU
Age 87
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 21, 1974* | London Wct | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Onny Parun | 6-3 6-4 | Ion Tiriac | Match data |
| Jun 26, 1973* | Eastbourne | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Onny Parun | 6-3 6-4 | Ion Tiriac | Match data |
| Mar 4, 1971* | Macon | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Ion Tiriac | 6-1 6-4 | Onny Parun | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Onny Parun | #398 | #18 | 0 | 1,990 | 375 | 342 | 52.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Ion Tiriac | #439 | #55 | 0 | 1,899 | 228 | 190 | 54.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Onny Parun | Ion Tiriac | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 1968 | 13–16 | 44.8% | — | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1969 | 13–22 | 37.1% | — | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1970 | 19–21 | 47.5% | — | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1971 | 26–24 | 52.0% | — | 1,689 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1972 | 39–36 | 52.0% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1973 | 49–43 | 53.3% | #40 | 1,731 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1974 | 76–37 | 67.3% | #25 | 1,945 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1975 | 65–31 | 67.7% | #26 | 1,889 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1976 | 38–23 | 62.3% | #29 | 1,816 | 0 | 6 | 1968 | 60–12 | 83.3% | — | 1,804 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 1977 | 13–27 | 32.5% | #149 | 1,624 | 0 | 6 | 1969 | 14–14 | 50.0% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | 1978 | 1–14 | 6.7% | #210 | 1,499 | 0 | 6 | 1970 | 34–22 | 60.7% | — | 1,795 | 0 | 7 |
| 32 | 1979 | 3–15 | 16.7% | #214 | 1,426 | 0 | 6 | 1971 | 27–16 | 62.8% | — | 1,778 | 0 | 8 |
| 33 | 1980 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #96 | 1,595 | 0 | 6 | 1972 | 21–25 | 45.7% | — | 1,654 | 0 | 8 |
| 34 | 1981 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #99 | 1,535 | 0 | 6 | 1973 | 35–35 | 50.0% | #74 | 1,683 | 0 | 8 |
| 35 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #200 | 1,522 | 0 | 6 | 1974 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #72 | 1,622 | 0 | 8 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #138 | 1,589 | 0 | 8 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #248 | 1,534 | 0 | 8 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #103 | 1,633 | 0 | 8 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #263 | 1,523 | 0 | 8 |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #439 | 1,525 | 0 | 8 |