H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Onny Parun vs Nikola Pilic H2H: 0-1
Nikola Pilic holds a 1–0 lead over Onny Parun in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nikola Pilic leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Nikola Pilic won the 1968 London second round 6-3 5-7 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NZL
Age 79
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CRO
Left-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 19, 1968* | London | ATP 250 | R64 | Grass | Nikola Pilic | 6-3 5-7 7-5 | Onny Parun | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Onny Parun | #398 | #18 | 0 | 1,990 | 375 | 342 | 52.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Nikola Pilic | #284 | #12 | 0 | 1,953 | 301 | 248 | 54.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Onny Parun | Nikola Pilic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 1968 | 13–16 | 44.8% | — | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1969 | 13–22 | 37.1% | — | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1970 | 19–21 | 47.5% | — | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1971 | 26–24 | 52.0% | — | 1,689 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1972 | 39–36 | 52.0% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1973 | 49–43 | 53.3% | #40 | 1,731 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1974 | 76–37 | 67.3% | #25 | 1,945 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1975 | 65–31 | 67.7% | #26 | 1,889 | 0 | 4 | 1968 | 42–46 | 47.7% | — | 1,638 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1976 | 38–23 | 62.3% | #29 | 1,816 | 0 | 6 | 1969 | 27–24 | 52.9% | — | 1,767 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 1977 | 13–27 | 32.5% | #149 | 1,624 | 0 | 6 | 1970 | 47–31 | 60.3% | — | 1,891 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 1978 | 1–14 | 6.7% | #210 | 1,499 | 0 | 6 | 1971 | 39–31 | 55.7% | — | 1,836 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 1979 | 3–15 | 16.7% | #214 | 1,426 | 0 | 6 | 1972 | 34–28 | 54.8% | — | 1,894 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | 1980 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #96 | 1,595 | 0 | 6 | 1973 | 44–27 | 62.0% | #15 | 1,840 | 0 | 5 |
| 34 | 1981 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #99 | 1,535 | 0 | 6 | 1974 | 22–12 | 64.7% | #32 | 1,898 | 0 | 5 |
| 35 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #200 | 1,522 | 0 | 6 | 1975 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #50 | 1,857 | 0 | 6 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #68 | 1,743 | 0 | 6 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #91 | 1,701 | 0 | 6 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #284 | 1,622 | 0 | 6 |