H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Onny Parun vs Rod Laver H2H: 0-4
Rod Laver holds a 4–0 lead over Onny Parun in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Rod Laver leads 2–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Rod Laver won the 1974 Houston semifinal 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NZL
Age 79
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
4
4 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 87
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 20, 1974* | Houston | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | Rod Laver | 6-3 6-1 | Onny Parun | Match data |
| Mar 21, 1974* | Sao Paulo Wct | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Rod Laver | 6-2 6-2 | Onny Parun | Match data |
| Mar 29, 1973* | St. Louis Wct | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Rod Laver | 6-3 6-4 | Onny Parun | Match data |
| Sep 6, 1970* | South Orange | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Rod Laver | 6-4 6-4 | Onny Parun | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Onny Parun | #398 | #18 | 0 | 1,990 | 375 | 342 | 52.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Rod Laver | #662 | #3 | 0 | 2,300 | 576 | 147 | 79.7% | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 65 | 72 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Onny Parun | Rod Laver | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 1968 | 13–16 | 44.8% | — | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1969 | 13–22 | 37.1% | — | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1970 | 19–21 | 47.5% | — | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1971 | 26–24 | 52.0% | — | 1,689 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1972 | 39–36 | 52.0% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1973 | 49–43 | 53.3% | #40 | 1,731 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1974 | 76–37 | 67.3% | #25 | 1,945 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1975 | 65–31 | 67.7% | #26 | 1,889 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1976 | 38–23 | 62.3% | #29 | 1,816 | 0 | 6 | 1968 | 73–19 | 79.3% | — | 1,881 | 1 | 13 |
| 30 | 1977 | 13–27 | 32.5% | #149 | 1,624 | 0 | 6 | 1969 | 97–14 | 87.4% | — | 2,161 | 5 | 29 |
| 31 | 1978 | 1–14 | 6.7% | #210 | 1,499 | 0 | 6 | 1970 | 89–15 | 85.6% | — | 2,213 | 5 | 42 |
| 32 | 1979 | 3–15 | 16.7% | #214 | 1,426 | 0 | 6 | 1971 | 85–20 | 81.0% | — | 2,155 | 5 | 49 |
| 33 | 1980 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #96 | 1,595 | 0 | 6 | 1972 | 50–16 | 75.8% | — | 2,016 | 5 | 54 |
| 34 | 1981 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #99 | 1,535 | 0 | 6 | 1973 | 67–16 | 80.7% | #8 | 2,088 | 5 | 61 |
| 35 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #200 | 1,522 | 0 | 6 | 1974 | 45–10 | 81.8% | #4 | 2,115 | 5 | 67 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 52–13 | 80.0% | #10 | 2,087 | 5 | 72 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #73 | 1,995 | 5 | 72 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #124 | 1,927 | 5 | 72 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #216 | 1,917 | 5 | 72 |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #662 | 1,901 | 5 | 72 |