H2H data updated: 2026-07-14 14:15 UTC
P. Annacone vs T. Smid H2H: 0-1
T. Smid holds a 1–0 lead over P. Annacone in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, T. Smid leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, T. Smid won the 1988 Orlando third round 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 63
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 70
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 1988* | Orlando | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | T. Smid | 7-5 6-4 | P. Annacone | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P. Annacone | #1,209 | #12 | 430 | 1,966 | 160 | 131 | 55.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| T. Smid | #975 | #11 | 28 | 1,998 | 497 | 318 | 61.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | P. Annacone | T. Smid | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1983 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #389 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #154 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1984 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #94 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #67 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1985 | 45–19 | 70.3% | #13 | 1,903 | 0 | 2 | 1978 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #36 | 1,799 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1986 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #43 | 1,787 | 0 | 2 | 1979 | 50–25 | 66.7% | #27 | 1,870 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1987 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #32 | 1,824 | 0 | 2 | 1980 | 45–21 | 68.2% | #23 | 1,950 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1988 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #38 | 1,787 | 0 | 2 | 1981 | 54–28 | 65.9% | #28 | 1,864 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 1989 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #65 | 1,732 | 0 | 3 | 1982 | 62–28 | 68.9% | #24 | 1,901 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | 1990 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #165 | 1,650 | 0 | 3 | 1983 | 59–30 | 66.3% | #17 | 1,902 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | 1991 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #433 | 1,630 | 0 | 3 | 1984 | 46–27 | 63.0% | #16 | 1,840 | 0 | 9 |
| 29 | 1992 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #225 | 1,588 | 0 | 3 | 1985 | 47–27 | 63.5% | #19 | 1,804 | 0 | 10 |
| 30 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #813 | 1,576 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #54 | 1,721 | 0 | 10 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #31 | 1,729 | 0 | 10 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #115 | 1,656 | 0 | 10 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #453 | 1,537 | 0 | 10 |