H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Pablo Andujar vs Federico Delbonis H2H: 4-3

Pablo Andujar holds a 4–3 lead over Federico Delbonis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, they are tied 3–3 on clay, while Pablo Andujar leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Federico Delbonis won the 2022 Buenos Aires fourth round 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Pablo Andujar
ESP Age 40 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
4 – 3
7 main draw meetings
Federico Delbonis
ARG Age 35 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 11, 2022* Buenos Aires ATP 250 R16 Clay Federico Delbonis #42 6-4 6-4 Pablo Andujar #73 Match data
Oct 28, 2021* St. Petersburg ATP 250 R32 Hard Pablo Andujar #92 6-2 7-6(1) Federico Delbonis #41 Match data
Jun 3, 2021* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Federico Delbonis #51 4-6 6-1 3-6 6-3 6-2 Pablo Andujar #68 Match data
Oct 16, 2020* Sardinia ATP 250 R16 Clay Federico Delbonis #78 5-7 7-6(5) 6-4 Pablo Andujar #54 Match data
Apr 11, 2019* Marrakech ATP 250 R32 Clay Pablo Andujar #70 7-6(6) 6-3 Federico Delbonis #74 Match data
Feb 13, 2014* Buenos Aires ATP 250 R32 Clay Pablo Andujar #43 3-6 7-5 6-1 Federico Delbonis #63 Match data
Apr 17, 2012* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Pablo Andujar #39 3-6 6-4 6-2 Federico Delbonis #144 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Pablo Andujar #1,102 #32 1,205 1,862 164 240 40.6% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Federico Delbonis #939 #33 1,435 1,905 158 195 44.8% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Pablo Andujar Federico Delbonis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 2009 0–1 0.0% #195 1,530 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2010 0–2 0.0% #160 1,469 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2011 3–2 60.0% #166 1,558 0 0
21 2007 3–4 42.9% #146 1,623 0 0 2012 6–9 40.0% #133 1,716 0 0
22 2008 3–6 33.3% #101 1,596 0 0 2013 12–8 60.0% #55 1,757 0 0
23 2009 1–12 7.7% #160 1,524 0 0 2014 20–27 42.6% #60 1,660 0 1
24 2010 8–8 50.0% #71 1,703 0 0 2015 15–18 45.5% #52 1,692 0 1
25 2011 25–28 47.2% #46 1,681 0 1 2016 24–22 52.2% #41 1,754 0 2
26 2012 19–29 39.6% #42 1,647 0 2 2017 11–10 52.4% #68 1,811 0 2
27 2013 18–31 36.7% #48 1,722 0 2 2018 11–18 37.9% #80 1,723 0 2
28 2014 23–22 51.1% #41 1,831 0 3 2019 14–20 41.2% #76 1,686 0 2
29 2015 16–22 42.1% #64 1,788 0 3 2020 9–12 42.9% #82 1,705 0 2
30 2016 1–7 12.5% #432 1,639 0 3 2021 24–24 50.0% #44 1,719 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 2022 8–21 27.6% #125 1,672 0 2
32 2018 7–7 50.0% #82 1,659 0 4 2023 1–1 50.0% #279 1,599 0 2
33 2019 15–18 45.5% #64 1,728 0 4 — — — — — — —
34 2020 4–12 25.0% #60 1,630 0 4 — — — — — — —
35 2021 12–17 41.4% #91 1,737 0 4 — — — — — — —
36 2022 9–13 40.9% #121 1,620 0 4 — — — — — — —
37 2023 0–4 0.0% #1102 1,518 0 4 — — — — — — —