H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC

Pablo Andujar vs Fernando Verdasco H2H: 3-3

Pablo Andujar and Fernando Verdasco are tied 3–3 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Pablo Andujar leads 2–1 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Pablo Andujar won the 2020 ATP Rio de Janeiro third round 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Pablo Andujar
ESP Age 40 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
3 – 3
6 main draw meetings
Fernando Verdasco
ESP Age 42 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 20, 2020* ATP Rio de Janeiro ATP 500 R32 Clay Pablo Andujar #59 6-3 6-3 Fernando Verdasco #49 Match data
Jan 8, 2020* Doha ATP 250 R32 Hard Fernando Verdasco #49 6-4 6-3 Pablo Andujar #64 Match data
Jul 26, 2014* Gstaad ATP 250 SF Clay Pablo Andujar #71 6-3 6-7(2) 6-1 Fernando Verdasco #38 Match data
Jul 21, 2011* Hamburg ATP 500 R32 Clay Fernando Verdasco #22 6-2 6-3 Pablo Andujar #44 Match data
Mar 26, 2011* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Pablo Andujar #69 3-6 7-6(3) 6-4 Fernando Verdasco #9 Match data
Jun 17, 2009* S Hertogenbosch ATP 250 R32 Grass Fernando Verdasco #8 6-3 7-5 Pablo Andujar #109 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Pablo Andujar #1,102 #32 1,205 1,862 164 240 40.6% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Fernando Verdasco #893 #7 3,900 2,125 549 441 55.5% 0 0 0 1 6 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Pablo Andujar Fernando Verdasco
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 2002 1–2 33.3% #173 1,502 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2003 7–12 36.8% #109 1,592 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2004 31–25 55.4% #36 1,732 0 1
21 2007 3–4 42.9% #146 1,623 0 0 2005 34–27 55.7% #32 1,791 0 1
22 2008 3–6 33.3% #101 1,596 0 0 2006 31–25 55.4% #35 1,726 0 1
23 2009 1–12 7.7% #160 1,524 0 0 2007 33–26 55.9% #26 1,864 0 1
24 2010 8–8 50.0% #71 1,703 0 0 2008 45–27 62.5% #16 1,876 0 2
25 2011 25–28 47.2% #46 1,681 0 1 2009 51–24 68.0% #9 2,001 0 3
26 2012 19–29 39.6% #42 1,647 0 2 2010 43–21 67.2% #9 1,926 0 5
27 2013 18–31 36.7% #48 1,722 0 2 2011 34–24 58.6% #24 1,930 0 5
28 2014 23–22 51.1% #41 1,831 0 3 2012 32–21 60.4% #24 1,915 0 5
29 2015 16–22 42.1% #64 1,788 0 3 2013 27–24 52.9% #30 1,891 0 5
30 2016 1–7 12.5% #432 1,639 0 3 2014 26–20 56.5% #33 1,880 0 6
31 — — — — — — — 2015 24–26 48.0% #49 1,822 0 6
32 2018 7–7 50.0% #82 1,659 0 4 2016 29–26 52.7% #42 1,824 0 7
33 2019 15–18 45.5% #64 1,728 0 4 2017 29–25 53.7% #35 1,895 0 7
34 2020 4–12 25.0% #60 1,630 0 4 2018 33–28 54.1% #28 1,915 0 7
35 2021 12–17 41.4% #91 1,737 0 4 2019 26–27 49.1% #49 1,810 0 7
36 2022 9–13 40.9% #121 1,620 0 4 2020 6–7 46.2% #65 1,768 0 7
37 2023 0–4 0.0% #1102 1,518 0 4 2021 2–8 20.0% #154 1,627 0 7
38 — — — — — — — 2022 5–11 31.2% #124 1,603 0 7
39 — — — — — — — 2023 0–5 0.0% #651 1,535 0 7