H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Pablo Andujar vs Horacio Zeballos H2H: 0-2
Horacio Zeballos holds a 2–0 lead over Pablo Andujar in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Horacio Zeballos leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Horacio Zeballos won the 2013 Santiago fourth round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 40
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 41
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 8, 2013* | Santiago | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Horacio Zeballos | 6-3 6-3 | Pablo Andujar | Match data |
| Feb 17, 2011* | Buenos Aires | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Horacio Zeballos | 7-6(3) 6-2 | Pablo Andujar | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pablo Andujar | #1,102 | #32 | 1,205 | 1,862 | 164 | 240 | 40.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Horacio Zeballos | #841 | #39 | 1,027 | 1,876 | 87 | 131 | 39.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Pablo Andujar | Horacio Zeballos | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 2007 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #146 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2008 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #101 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2009 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #160 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2010 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #71 | 1,703 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2011 | 25–28 | 47.2% | #46 | 1,681 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 14–26 | 35.0% | #110 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2012 | 19–29 | 39.6% | #42 | 1,647 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #109 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2013 | 18–31 | 36.7% | #48 | 1,722 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #85 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2014 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #41 | 1,831 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #56 | 1,587 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2015 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #64 | 1,788 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #123 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2016 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #432 | 1,639 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #124 | 1,645 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #71 | 1,671 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2018 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #82 | 1,659 | 0 | 4 | 2017 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #66 | 1,758 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 2019 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #64 | 1,728 | 0 | 4 | 2018 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #173 | 1,721 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | 2020 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #60 | 1,630 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2021 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #91 | 1,737 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2022 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #121 | 1,620 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2023 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #1102 | 1,518 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |