H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Pablo Andujar vs Horacio Zeballos H2H: 0-2

Horacio Zeballos holds a 2–0 lead over Pablo Andujar in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Horacio Zeballos leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Horacio Zeballos won the 2013 Chile Open second round 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Pablo Andujar
ESP Age 40 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main draw meetings
Horacio Zeballos
ARG Age 41 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Horacio Zeballos #73 6-3 6-3 Pablo Andujar #45 Match data Feb 8, 2013* R16 Chile Open ATP 250 Clay
Horacio Zeballos #97 7-6(3) 6-2 Pablo Andujar #67 Match data Feb 17, 2011* R32 Argentina Open ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Pablo Andujar #1,102 #32 1,205 1,862 164 241 40.5% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Horacio Zeballos #841 #39 1,027 1,877 87 131 39.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Pablo Andujar Horacio Zeballos
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
21 2007 3–4 42.9% #146 1,641 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2008 3–6 33.3% #101 1,603 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 2009 1–12 7.7% #160 1,527 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 2010 8–8 50.0% #71 1,703 0 0 2009 5–5 50.0% #45 1,613 0 0
25 2011 25–28 47.2% #46 1,681 0 1 2010 14–26 35.0% #110 1,595 0 0
26 2012 19–29 39.6% #42 1,647 0 2 2011 5–6 45.5% #109 1,598 0 0
27 2013 18–31 36.7% #48 1,722 0 2 2012 3–9 25.0% #85 1,591 0 0
28 2014 23–22 51.1% #41 1,828 0 3 2013 14–23 37.8% #56 1,587 0 1
29 2015 16–22 42.1% #64 1,789 0 3 2014 7–9 43.8% #123 1,633 0 1
30 2016 1–7 12.5% #432 1,639 0 3 2015 2–4 33.3% #124 1,645 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 2016 7–13 35.0% #71 1,670 0 1
32 2018 7–7 50.0% #82 1,659 0 4 2017 20–22 47.6% #66 1,759 0 1
33 2019 15–18 45.5% #64 1,722 0 4 2018 10–14 41.7% #173 1,721 0 1
34 2020 4–12 25.0% #60 1,627 0 4 — — — — — — —
35 2021 12–18 40.0% #91 1,739 0 4 — — — — — — —
36 2022 9–13 40.9% #121 1,622 0 4 — — — — — — —
37 2023 0–4 0.0% #1102 1,519 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Pablo Andujar Horacio Zeballos
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
21 2007 — — — — 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2008 0 2 2 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2009 0 2 2 0.0% 1 7 8 12.5% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2010 1 2 3 33.3% 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — 2009 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2011 3 11 14 21.4% 22 14 36 61.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 2010 5 13 18 27.8% 8 11 19 42.1% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 2012 8 16 24 33.3% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2011 0 1 1 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — —
27 2013 6 15 21 28.6% 12 14 26 46.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 2012 0 2 2 0.0% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — —
28 2014 8 12 20 40.0% 15 9 24 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2013 3 9 12 25.0% 11 13 24 45.8% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 2015 2 9 11 18.2% 12 10 22 54.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 2014 3 4 7 42.9% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — —
30 2016 1 4 5 20.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2015 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 6 5 11 54.5% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 3 3 0.0%
32 2018 0 1 1 0.0% 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — 2017 5 8 13 38.5% 15 12 27 55.6% 0 2 2 0.0%
33 2019 6 10 16 37.5% 9 7 16 56.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2018 3 5 8 37.5% 6 8 14 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0%
34 2020 1 7 8 12.5% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 4 8 12 33.3% 7 8 15 46.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2022 4 4 8 50.0% 5 8 13 38.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2023 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 44 105 149 29.5% 117 118 235 49.8% 3 18 21 14.3% — 30 51 81 37.0% 55 69 124 44.4% 2 11 13 15.4%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 400/405 of Pablo Andujar's and 218/218 of Horacio Zeballos's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Pablo Andujar Horacio Zeballos
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
21 2007 7/7 0.7 1.9 66.3% 64.8% 46.3% 61.1% 30.7% 58.8% 41.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2008 9/9 1.9 3.2 72.5% 63.3% 43.8% 57.9% 48.8% 57.8% 39.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2009 13/13 1.8 3.5 62.9% 60.3% 47.1% 45.6% 27.5% 55.0% 34.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2010 16/16 1.4 2.6 66.3% 63.5% 49.0% 44.1% 41.3% 58.7% 39.0% 2009 10/10 6.8 2.7 65.2% 71.0% 57.0% 65.7% 54.8% 66.1% 32.9%
25 2011 53/53 1.6 2.6 61.4% 64.9% 49.3% 54.6% 47.4% 58.9% 39.6% 2010 40/40 5.8 2.2 63.1% 67.6% 47.7% 60.4% 40.6% 60.5% 32.0%
26 2012 48/48 1.6 4.8 58.7% 63.3% 47.6% 49.6% 43.3% 57.0% 39.4% 2011 11/11 6.0 2.7 61.9% 73.7% 49.3% 65.4% 44.9% 64.3% 34.0%
27 2013 49/49 1.5 3.4 60.1% 65.2% 47.6% 60.0% 42.4% 58.1% 37.2% 2012 12/12 5.5 2.8 62.0% 67.1% 51.1% 62.2% 33.6% 61.2% 33.9%
28 2014 44/45 1.5 2.3 64.7% 64.8% 52.6% 53.6% 43.7% 60.3% 41.1% 2013 37/37 5.6 2.7 62.6% 69.2% 49.1% 59.1% 36.2% 61.6% 30.6%
29 2015 38/38 2.4 2.4 66.9% 64.8% 52.5% 56.2% 42.5% 60.4% 39.3% 2014 16/16 4.0 1.8 59.1% 72.9% 52.7% 59.2% 36.6% 64.5% 30.5%
30 2016 8/8 2.0 2.5 66.8% 65.1% 43.3% 38.1% 50.3% 58.0% 36.1% 2015 6/6 7.2 2.8 62.6% 67.8% 44.1% 67.3% 35.5% 59.1% 31.0%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 20/20 6.2 3.1 60.1% 72.6% 51.9% 55.7% 34.3% 64.1% 28.4%
32 2018 14/14 1.1 2.1 66.5% 63.1% 50.9% 49.9% 42.9% 58.9% 43.1% 2017 42/42 5.8 2.2 64.1% 71.2% 54.7% 56.0% 37.5% 65.0% 32.5%
33 2019 32/33 1.8 3.1 65.0% 65.9% 46.8% 53.4% 38.3% 59.2% 37.7% 2018 24/24 6.4 3.0 63.5% 71.6% 50.7% 69.3% 38.9% 64.1% 31.6%
34 2020 16/16 1.0 3.8 62.3% 65.9% 47.8% 56.9% 39.8% 59.2% 38.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 28/30 2.2 4.5 63.7% 64.8% 45.8% 57.7% 44.1% 57.9% 39.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2022 21/22 1.2 4.5 65.1% 63.6% 45.5% 54.4% 47.8% 57.4% 38.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2023 4/4 0.5 4.5 63.6% 49.1% 41.5% 39.5% 41.7% 46.7% 35.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 400/405 1.6 3.3 63.4% 64.3% 48.4% 53.8% 42.9% 58.4% 39.0% — 218/218 5.8 2.5 62.6% 70.3% 51.0% 60.6% 38.6% 63.0% 31.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Pablo Andujar Horacio Zeballos
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
20 2006 1500 97.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2007 1641 120.5 -0.88 +0.96 0.993 49.9% — +64 — 38.5% -0.31 0–1 0–1 — -0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2008 1603 123.0 -1.80 +0.19 0.925 48.4% — +131 — 36.0% -0.60 1–1 1–4 (20%) — -0.07 2007 1461 95.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2009 1528 112.1 -4.44 -1.83 0.769 45.0% — +94 +15 21.9% -2.16 0–3 (0%) 3–1 (75%) 97.7 -0.45 2008 1506 105.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2010 1704 127.5 -2.91 -0.31 0.944 48.7% -298 +150 — 50.0% -0.15 3–4 (43%) 3–1 (75%) 101.0 +0.67 2009 1613 122.4 +1.10 -2.29 0.970 50.1% +38 — — 53.8% +0.27 0–2 6–5 (55%) — +0.76
25 2011 1682 142.1 -3.31 +1.86 0.963 49.5% -262 +224 -224 45.8% -0.28 7–4 (64%) 5–8 (38%) 104.8 +1.11 2010 1595 130.9 -1.88 -3.97 0.808 46.6% -14 +43 -118 37.2% -1.03 6–7 (46%) 7–9 (44%) 99.7 +0.16
26 2012 1648 141.7 -4.98 +1.68 0.916 48.1% -112 +167 — 42.7% -0.66 7–11 (39%) 11–7 (61%) 102.9 +2.10 2011 1598 122.3 +1.03 -2.09 0.954 49.5% — +59 — 48.0% -0.04 0–1 3–4 (43%) — -0.49
27 2013 1723 143.9 -4.35 +0.71 0.886 47.8% -86 +64 — 36.5% -0.90 7–10 (41%) 4–10 (29%) 95.1 +0.42 2012 1591 117.8 -2.87 -2.13 0.873 48.1% — +83 — 31.0% -0.66 0–1 1–4 (20%) — +0.33
28 2014 1829 154.7 -2.21 +3.99 1.033 50.6% -119 +88 — 50.0% +0.07 5–8 (38%) 1–10 (9%) 92.0 -0.85 2013 1587 139.5 -1.23 -4.62 0.798 46.8% -106 +128 — 39.6% -0.52 10–5 (67%) 6–13 (32%) 103.9 +1.72
29 2015 1789 148.0 -2.34 +2.40 0.992 49.7% -168 +142 -303 46.9% -0.13 6–9 (40%) 6–7 (46%) 98.0 -1.10 2014 1633 127.6 +0.28 -3.69 0.858 48.3% -130 +105 — 41.7% -0.45 2–1 (67%) 3–3 (50%) 101.6 +0.69
30 2016 1639 110.7 -2.76 -0.49 0.860 47.0% -100 +213 — 22.2% -1.78 1–1 0–2 — -0.18 2015 1645 109.3 -1.33 -2.33 0.758 45.3% — +91 — 35.7% -1.72 0–1 2–2 (50%) — +0.09
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1671 134.9 +0.65 -5.16 0.790 47.3% -42 -28 -181 38.3% -0.77 2–1 (67%) 3–4 (43%) 101.8 +0.23
32 2018 1660 127.2 -1.98 +4.21 1.049 50.8% — +129 — 53.3% +0.33 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 96.4 +0.39 2017 1759 146.3 +0.83 -2.99 0.928 48.8% -104 +58 — 45.6% -0.27 8–4 (67%) 13–13 (50%) 106.3 -1.38
33 2019 1723 140.9 -4.05 +1.79 0.922 48.3% -109 +105 — 43.9% -0.55 5–4 (56%) 7–4 (64%) 106.5 -0.59 2018 1721 138.6 +0.08 -3.27 0.880 48.8% -71 +37 — 43.9% -0.35 4–6 (40%) 8–8 (50%) 98.5 -1.23
34 2020 1628 133.5 -2.24 +0.41 0.940 48.4% -53 +127 — 32.5% -0.97 0–5 (0%) 1–2 (33%) 94.2 -0.16 2019 1705 98.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 1739 137.5 -4.15 +2.05 0.926 48.8% -128 +66 — 45.9% -0.36 6–8 (43%) 5–5 (50%) 100.4 -0.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2022 1622 128.4 -3.35 +0.90 0.912 48.5% +5 +51 — 45.5% -0.49 2–4 (33%) 4–3 (57%) 98.4 +1.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2023 1520 95.2 -4.98 -1.21 0.672 41.8% — — — 0.0% -3.17 — — — +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1862 143.7 -3.41 +1.63 0.938 48.7% -123 +126 -195 42.7% -0.51 51–75 (40%) 52–67 (44%) 95.7 +0.55 — 1877 137.5 -0.40 -3.58 0.854 47.8% -57 +70 -150 41.4% -0.54 32–29 (52%) 52–65 (44%) 103.5 +0.40

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.