H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Pablo Andujar vs Michael Llodra H2H: 0-1
Michael Llodra holds a 1–0 lead over Pablo Andujar in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Michael Llodra leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Michael Llodra won the 2013 Queen's Club second round 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 40
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 46
Left-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 2013* | Queen's Club | ATP 500 | R64 | Grass | Michael Llodra | 6-3 6-1 | Pablo Andujar | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pablo Andujar | #1,102 | #32 | 1,205 | 1,862 | 164 | 240 | 40.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Michael Llodra | #631 | #21 | 1,575 | 1,901 | 182 | 215 | 45.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Pablo Andujar | Michael Llodra | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #159 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2007 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #146 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #89 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2008 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #101 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #104 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2009 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #160 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #173 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2010 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #71 | 1,703 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 20–12 | 62.5% | #41 | 1,734 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2011 | 25–28 | 47.2% | #46 | 1,681 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,625 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2012 | 19–29 | 39.6% | #42 | 1,647 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #96 | 1,608 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2013 | 18–31 | 36.7% | #48 | 1,722 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #93 | 1,640 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2014 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #41 | 1,831 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #40 | 1,725 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2015 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #64 | 1,788 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #67 | 1,738 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2016 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #432 | 1,639 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #23 | 1,879 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #47 | 1,776 | 0 | 5 |
| 32 | 2018 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #82 | 1,659 | 0 | 4 | 2012 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #53 | 1,842 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | 2019 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #64 | 1,728 | 0 | 4 | 2013 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #105 | 1,787 | 0 | 5 |
| 34 | 2020 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #60 | 1,630 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #269 | 1,688 | 0 | 5 |
| 35 | 2021 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #91 | 1,737 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2022 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #121 | 1,620 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2023 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #1102 | 1,518 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |