H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Pablo Andujar vs Nicolas Almagro H2H: 0-4
Nicolas Almagro holds a 4–0 lead over Pablo Andujar in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Nicolas Almagro leads 3–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nicolas Almagro won the 2015 Buenos Aires third round 6-3 3-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 40
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
4
4 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 40
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 2015* | Buenos Aires | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Nicolas Almagro | 6-3 3-6 6-2 | Pablo Andujar | Match data |
| Oct 24, 2013* | Valencia | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Nicolas Almagro | 6-2 6-3 | Pablo Andujar | Match data |
| May 20, 2011* | Nice | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Nicolas Almagro | 6-1 6-4 | Pablo Andujar | Match data |
| Apr 21, 2011* | Barcelona | ATP 500 | R32 | Clay | Nicolas Almagro | 7-5 7-6(1) | Pablo Andujar | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pablo Andujar | #1,102 | #32 | 1,205 | 1,862 | 164 | 240 | 40.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Nicolas Almagro | #846 | #9 | 2,735 | 2,076 | 385 | 272 | 58.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 11 | 13 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Pablo Andujar | Nicolas Almagro | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #156 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #103 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #114 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #32 | 1,721 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2007 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #146 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 32–27 | 54.2% | #28 | 1,723 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2008 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #101 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 34–16 | 68.0% | #18 | 1,794 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 2009 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #160 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #26 | 1,831 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 2010 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #71 | 1,703 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 41–23 | 64.1% | #15 | 1,885 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 2011 | 25–28 | 47.2% | #46 | 1,681 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 47–23 | 67.1% | #10 | 1,874 | 0 | 10 |
| 26 | 2012 | 19–29 | 39.6% | #42 | 1,647 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 51–21 | 70.8% | #11 | 2,010 | 0 | 12 |
| 27 | 2013 | 18–31 | 36.7% | #48 | 1,722 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #13 | 1,961 | 0 | 12 |
| 28 | 2014 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #41 | 1,831 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #71 | 1,928 | 0 | 12 |
| 29 | 2015 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #64 | 1,788 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #73 | 1,795 | 0 | 12 |
| 30 | 2016 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #432 | 1,639 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #44 | 1,790 | 0 | 13 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #151 | 1,833 | 0 | 13 |
| 32 | 2018 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #82 | 1,659 | 0 | 4 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #846 | 1,777 | 0 | 13 |
| 33 | 2019 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #64 | 1,728 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2020 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #60 | 1,630 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2021 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #91 | 1,737 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2022 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #121 | 1,620 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2023 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #1102 | 1,518 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |