H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Pablo Andujar vs Sergiy Stakhovsky H2H: 0-1
Sergiy Stakhovsky holds a 1–0 lead over Pablo Andujar in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sergiy Stakhovsky leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sergiy Stakhovsky won the 2012 Winston-Salem third round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 40
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
UKR
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 22, 2012* | Winston-Salem | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Sergiy Stakhovsky | 6-2 6-3 | Pablo Andujar | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pablo Andujar | #1,102 | #32 | 1,205 | 1,862 | 164 | 240 | 40.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Sergiy Stakhovsky | #678 | #31 | 1,263 | 1,839 | 145 | 195 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Pablo Andujar | Sergiy Stakhovsky | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2007 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #146 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #335 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #101 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #184 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #160 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #195 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #71 | 1,703 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #199 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 25–28 | 47.2% | #46 | 1,681 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #92 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 |
| 2012 | 19–29 | 39.6% | #42 | 1,647 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #60 | 1,750 | 0 | 2 |
| 2013 | 18–31 | 36.7% | #48 | 1,722 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,743 | 0 | 4 |
| 2014 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #41 | 1,831 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #62 | 1,707 | 0 | 4 |
| 2015 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #64 | 1,788 | 0 | 3 | 2012 | 13–26 | 33.3% | #103 | 1,739 | 0 | 4 |
| 2016 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #432 | 1,639 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #98 | 1,679 | 0 | 4 |
| 2018 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #82 | 1,659 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #58 | 1,686 | 0 | 4 |
| 2019 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #64 | 1,728 | 0 | 4 | 2015 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #62 | 1,715 | 0 | 4 |
| 2020 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #60 | 1,630 | 0 | 4 | 2016 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #109 | 1,693 | 0 | 4 |
| 2021 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #91 | 1,737 | 0 | 4 | 2017 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #122 | 1,728 | 0 | 4 |
| 2022 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #121 | 1,620 | 0 | 4 | 2018 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #134 | 1,649 | 0 | 4 |
| 2023 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #1102 | 1,518 | 0 | 4 | 2019 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #150 | 1,576 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,568 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #220 | 1,530 | 0 | 4 |