H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Pablo Arraya vs Fernando Luna H2H: 1-2
Fernando Luna holds a 2–1 lead over Pablo Arraya in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Fernando Luna leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Fernando Luna won the 1985 Nice third round 6-1 2-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
PER
Age 64
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 68
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 11, 1985* | Nice | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Fernando Luna | 6-1 2-6 6-1 | Pablo Arraya | Match data |
| Sep 13, 1984* | Palermo | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Fernando Luna | 5-7 6-4 6-1 | Pablo Arraya | Match data |
| Aug 6, 1984 | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Pablo Arraya | 3-6 6-4 6-4 | Fernando Luna | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pablo Arraya | #1,187 | #29 | 348 | 1,821 | 168 | 168 | 50.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Fernando Luna | #723 | #33 | 310 | 1,777 | 167 | 160 | 51.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Pablo Arraya | Fernando Luna | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1980 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #309 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1981 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #91 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #250 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1982 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #37 | 1,750 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #340 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1983 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #39 | 1,806 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #87 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1984 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 18–13 | 58.1% | #66 | 1,707 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1985 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #88 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #81 | 1,695 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1986 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #60 | 1,671 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #60 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1987 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #132 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 19–13 | 59.4% | #53 | 1,729 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1988 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #169 | 1,552 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #70 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1989 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #312 | 1,488 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #111 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1990 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #157 | 1,501 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #52 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1991 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #121 | 1,545 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #261 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1992 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #174 | 1,559 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #59 | 1,705 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #135 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #110 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #356 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |