H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Pablo Arraya vs Paolo Bertolucci H2H: 1-0
Pablo Arraya holds a 1–0 lead over Paolo Bertolucci in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Pablo Arraya leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Pablo Arraya won the 1982 Rome fourth round 6-0 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
PER
Age 64
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 74
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 22, 1982* | Rome | Masters 1000 | R16 | Clay | Pablo Arraya | 6-0 7-6 | Paolo Bertolucci | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pablo Arraya | #1,187 | #29 | 348 | 1,821 | 168 | 168 | 50.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Paolo Bertolucci | #382 | #12 | 0 | 1,930 | 198 | 150 | 56.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Pablo Arraya | Paolo Bertolucci | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,443 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1980 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #309 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1981 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #91 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 4–1 | 80.0% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1982 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #37 | 1,750 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 7–7 | 50.0% | — | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1983 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #39 | 1,806 | 0 | 1 | 1973 | 30–19 | 61.2% | #20 | 1,791 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1984 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 | 1974 | 14–6 | 70.0% | #50 | 1,776 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1985 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #88 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 | 1975 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #57 | 1,669 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1986 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #60 | 1,671 | 0 | 1 | 1976 | 33–17 | 66.0% | #33 | 1,830 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1987 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #132 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 | 1977 | 30–14 | 68.2% | #29 | 1,809 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 1988 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #169 | 1,552 | 0 | 1 | 1978 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #44 | 1,793 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 1989 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #312 | 1,488 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #158 | 1,739 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 1990 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #157 | 1,501 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #72 | 1,761 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 1991 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #121 | 1,545 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #93 | 1,690 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 1992 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #174 | 1,559 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #138 | 1,657 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #285 | 1,630 | 0 | 6 |