H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Pablo Arraya vs Pavel Slozil H2H: 1-1
Pablo Arraya and Pavel Slozil are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Pablo Arraya won the 1985 Monte Carlo second round 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
PER
Age 64
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 70
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 3, 1985* | Monte Carlo | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Pablo Arraya | 6-4 7-5 | Pavel Slozil | Match data |
| Sep 21, 1984* | Bordeaux | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Pavel Slozil | 6-1 6-0 | Pablo Arraya | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pablo Arraya | #1,187 | #29 | 348 | 1,821 | 168 | 168 | 50.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Pavel Slozil | #550 | #12 | 0 | 1,790 | 142 | 160 | 47.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Pablo Arraya | Pavel Slozil | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1980 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #309 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1981 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #91 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #218 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1982 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #37 | 1,750 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #310 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1983 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #39 | 1,806 | 0 | 1 | 1977 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #226 | 1,418 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1984 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 | 1978 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #190 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1985 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #88 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #78 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1986 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #60 | 1,671 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #68 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1987 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #132 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #68 | 1,719 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1988 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #169 | 1,552 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #49 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1989 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #312 | 1,488 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #81 | 1,679 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1990 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #157 | 1,501 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #40 | 1,732 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1991 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #121 | 1,545 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 18–26 | 40.9% | #95 | 1,643 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 1992 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #174 | 1,559 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #165 | 1,587 | 0 | 2 |