H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Pablo Arraya vs Peter Feigl H2H: 2-0
Pablo Arraya holds a 2–0 lead over Peter Feigl in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Pablo Arraya leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Pablo Arraya won the 1982 Zell Am See Wct third round 6-3 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
PER
Age 64
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 74
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 15, 1982* | Zell Am See Wct | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Pablo Arraya | 6-3 7-6 | Peter Feigl | Match data |
| Jan 21, 1982* | Guaruja | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Pablo Arraya | 7-5 6-7 4-3 (ret.) | Peter Feigl | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pablo Arraya | #1,187 | #29 | 348 | 1,821 | 168 | 168 | 50.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Peter Feigl | #470 | #35 | 0 | 1,794 | 107 | 113 | 48.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Pablo Arraya | Peter Feigl | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1980 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #309 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1981 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #91 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1982 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #37 | 1,750 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1983 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #39 | 1,806 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1984 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1985 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #88 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 | 1975 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1986 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #60 | 1,671 | 0 | 1 | 1976 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #272 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1987 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #132 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 | 1977 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #184 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1988 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #169 | 1,552 | 0 | 1 | 1978 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #45 | 1,743 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1989 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #312 | 1,488 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #47 | 1,620 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1990 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #157 | 1,501 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #75 | 1,719 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1991 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #121 | 1,545 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #93 | 1,539 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 1992 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #174 | 1,559 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #184 | 1,586 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #137 | 1,583 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #225 | 1,581 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #311 | 1,549 | 0 | 3 |