H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Pablo Arraya vs Van Winitsky H2H: 0-1
Van Winitsky holds a 1–0 lead over Pablo Arraya in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Van Winitsky leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Van Winitsky won the 1982 Guaruja fourth round 7-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
PER
Age 64
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 67
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 1982* | Guaruja | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Van Winitsky | 7-6 6-2 | Pablo Arraya | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pablo Arraya | #1,187 | #29 | 348 | 1,821 | 168 | 168 | 50.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Van Winitsky | #834 | #35 | 0 | 1,852 | 106 | 133 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Pablo Arraya | Van Winitsky | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #282 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #239 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1980 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #309 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #169 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1981 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #91 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 15–25 | 37.5% | #132 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1982 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #37 | 1,750 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #141 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1983 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #39 | 1,806 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #90 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1984 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 16–12 | 57.1% | #47 | 1,717 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1985 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #88 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #53 | 1,698 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1986 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #60 | 1,671 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #91 | 1,646 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1987 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #132 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #133 | 1,564 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1988 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #169 | 1,552 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #331 | 1,551 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1989 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #312 | 1,488 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1990 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #157 | 1,501 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1991 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #121 | 1,545 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1992 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #174 | 1,559 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |