H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Pablo Arraya vs Wojtek Fibak H2H: 1-0
Pablo Arraya holds a 1–0 lead over Wojtek Fibak in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Pablo Arraya leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Pablo Arraya won the 1982 Rome quarterfinal 2-6 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
PER
Age 64
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
POL
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 1982* | Rome | Masters 1000 | QF | Clay | Pablo Arraya | 2-6 6-3 6-2 | Wojtek Fibak | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pablo Arraya | #1,187 | #29 | 348 | 1,821 | 168 | 168 | 50.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Wojtek Fibak | #566 | #10 | 0 | 2,089 | 520 | 309 | 62.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 14 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Pablo Arraya | Wojtek Fibak | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1980 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #309 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #102 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #91 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 39–33 | 54.2% | #58 | 1,746 | 0 | 0 |
| 1982 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #37 | 1,750 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 74–31 | 70.5% | #14 | 2,070 | 0 | 3 |
| 1983 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #39 | 1,806 | 0 | 1 | 1977 | 60–30 | 66.7% | #13 | 1,989 | 0 | 4 |
| 1984 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 | 1978 | 60–32 | 65.2% | #21 | 1,895 | 0 | 5 |
| 1985 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #88 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 59–22 | 72.8% | #15 | 1,976 | 0 | 7 |
| 1986 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #60 | 1,671 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 58–25 | 69.9% | #14 | 1,941 | 0 | 10 |
| 1987 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #132 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #17 | 1,846 | 0 | 11 |
| 1988 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #169 | 1,552 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 52–26 | 66.7% | #23 | 1,988 | 0 | 14 |
| 1989 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #312 | 1,488 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #40 | 1,779 | 0 | 14 |
| 1990 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #157 | 1,501 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #45 | 1,727 | 0 | 14 |
| 1991 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #121 | 1,545 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #62 | 1,721 | 0 | 14 |
| 1992 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #174 | 1,559 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #125 | 1,636 | 0 | 14 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #742 | 1,572 | 0 | 14 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #570 | 1,573 | 0 | 14 |