H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Pablo Carreno Busta vs Federico Delbonis H2H: 4-5
Federico Delbonis holds a 5–4 lead over Pablo Carreno Busta in their ATP head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, they are tied 4–4 on clay, while Federico Delbonis leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Pablo Carreno Busta won the 2022 Rome Masters second round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Spain
Age 35
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
4
–
5
9 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 35
Left-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pablo Carreno Busta | #65 | #10 | 3,325 | 2,047 | 277 | 232 | 54.4% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 7 |
| Federico Delbonis | #939 | #33 | 1,435 | 1,905 | 158 | 195 | 44.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Pablo Carreno Busta | Federico Delbonis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #195 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #136 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #160 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #166 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2013 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #64 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #133 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2014 | 14–24 | 36.8% | #51 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #55 | 1,757 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2015 | 14–25 | 35.9% | #67 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #60 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2016 | 40–26 | 60.6% | #30 | 1,962 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #52 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2017 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #10 | 1,887 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #41 | 1,754 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2018 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #23 | 1,867 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #68 | 1,811 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2019 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #27 | 1,963 | 0 | 4 | 2018 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #80 | 1,723 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2020 | 20–12 | 62.5% | #16 | 2,020 | 0 | 4 | 2019 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #76 | 1,686 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2021 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #20 | 1,906 | 0 | 6 | 2020 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #82 | 1,705 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2022 | 33–23 | 58.9% | #13 | 1,920 | 0 | 7 | 2021 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #44 | 1,719 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2023 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #606 | 1,852 | 0 | 7 | 2022 | 8–21 | 27.6% | #125 | 1,672 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2024 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #196 | 1,762 | 0 | 7 | 2023 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #279 | 1,599 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 2025 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #93 | 1,675 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2026 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #65 | 1,768 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |