H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Pablo Carreno Busta vs Marcos Baghdatis H2H: 0-1
Marcos Baghdatis holds a 1–0 lead over Pablo Carreno Busta in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Marcos Baghdatis leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Marcos Baghdatis won the 2016 Chengdu third round 6-7(5) 7-6(5) 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Spain
Age 35
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CYP
Age 41
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2016* | Chengdu | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Marcos Baghdatis | 6-7(5) 7-6(5) 7-6(5) | Pablo Carreno Busta | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pablo Carreno Busta | #65 | #10 | 3,325 | 2,047 | 277 | 232 | 54.4% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 7 |
| Marcos Baghdatis | #179 | #8 | 2,111 | 1,952 | 324 | 272 | 54.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Pablo Carreno Busta | Marcos Baghdatis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #136 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #159 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #55 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2013 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #64 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 33–20 | 62.3% | #12 | 1,842 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2014 | 14–24 | 36.8% | #51 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #16 | 1,937 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2015 | 14–25 | 35.9% | #67 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #98 | 1,815 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2016 | 40–26 | 60.6% | #30 | 1,962 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #42 | 1,810 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2017 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #10 | 1,887 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 41–27 | 60.3% | #20 | 1,852 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2018 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #23 | 1,867 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 26–27 | 49.1% | #44 | 1,844 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 2019 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #27 | 1,963 | 0 | 4 | 2012 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #36 | 1,897 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2020 | 20–12 | 62.5% | #16 | 2,020 | 0 | 4 | 2013 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #87 | 1,804 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2021 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #20 | 1,906 | 0 | 6 | 2014 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #85 | 1,703 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2022 | 33–23 | 58.9% | #13 | 1,920 | 0 | 7 | 2015 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #46 | 1,869 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 2023 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #606 | 1,852 | 0 | 7 | 2016 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #36 | 1,884 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 2024 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #196 | 1,762 | 0 | 7 | 2017 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #102 | 1,839 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | 2025 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #93 | 1,675 | 0 | 7 | 2018 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #124 | 1,723 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | 2026 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #65 | 1,768 | 0 | 7 | 2019 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #179 | 1,740 | 0 | 4 |