H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Pablo Carreno Busta vs Rajeev Ram
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Pablo Carreno Busta vs Rajeev Ram.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Spain
Age 35
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
0
0 main draw meetings
USA
Age 42
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No head-to-head meetings found. | ||||||||
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pablo Carreno Busta | #65 | #10 | 3,325 | 2,047 | 277 | 232 | 54.4% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 7 |
| Rajeev Ram | #1,076 | #56 | 826 | 1,747 | 57 | 94 | 37.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Pablo Carreno Busta | Rajeev Ram | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #536 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #136 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #437 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #297 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2013 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #64 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #195 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2014 | 14–24 | 36.8% | #51 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #197 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2015 | 14–25 | 35.9% | #67 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #253 | 1,417 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2016 | 40–26 | 60.6% | #30 | 1,962 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #190 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2017 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #10 | 1,887 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #79 | 1,579 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2018 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #23 | 1,867 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 6–18 | 25.0% | #184 | 1,590 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2019 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #27 | 1,963 | 0 | 4 | 2011 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #149 | 1,605 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2020 | 20–12 | 62.5% | #16 | 2,020 | 0 | 4 | 2012 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #132 | 1,635 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2021 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #20 | 1,906 | 0 | 6 | 2013 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #127 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2022 | 33–23 | 58.9% | #13 | 1,920 | 0 | 7 | 2014 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #139 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2023 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #606 | 1,852 | 0 | 7 | 2015 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #89 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2024 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #196 | 1,762 | 0 | 7 | 2016 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #129 | 1,615 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 2025 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #93 | 1,675 | 0 | 7 | 2017 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #353 | 1,582 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | 2026 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #65 | 1,768 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |