H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Paolo Bertolucci vs Vladimir Zednik H2H: 2-0
Paolo Bertolucci holds a 2–0 lead over Vladimir Zednik in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Paolo Bertolucci leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Paolo Bertolucci won the 1978 Barcelona third round 6-3 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 74
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 79
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 12, 1978* | Barcelona | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Paolo Bertolucci | 6-3 7-6 | Vladimir Zednik | Match data |
| Oct 24, 1973* | Madrid | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Paolo Bertolucci | 4-6 6-1 10-8 | Vladimir Zednik | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paolo Bertolucci | #382 | #12 | 0 | 1,930 | 198 | 150 | 56.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Vladimir Zednik | #300 | #35 | 0 | 1,753 | 113 | 157 | 41.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Paolo Bertolucci | Vladimir Zednik | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1968 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,443 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1971 | 4–1 | 80.0% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1972 | 7–7 | 50.0% | — | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1973 | 30–19 | 61.2% | #20 | 1,791 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1974 | 14–6 | 70.0% | #50 | 1,776 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1975 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #57 | 1,669 | 0 | 1 | 1970 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1976 | 33–17 | 66.0% | #33 | 1,830 | 0 | 3 | 1971 | 17–20 | 45.9% | — | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1977 | 30–14 | 68.2% | #29 | 1,809 | 0 | 6 | 1972 | 19–20 | 48.7% | — | 1,647 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1978 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #44 | 1,793 | 0 | 6 | 1973 | 14–24 | 36.8% | #90 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1979 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #158 | 1,739 | 0 | 6 | 1974 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #93 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1980 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #72 | 1,761 | 0 | 6 | 1975 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #157 | 1,601 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1981 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #93 | 1,690 | 0 | 6 | 1976 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #106 | 1,585 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1982 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #138 | 1,657 | 0 | 6 | 1977 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #75 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 1983 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #285 | 1,630 | 0 | 6 | 1978 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #70 | 1,658 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #300 | 1,580 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,570 | 0 | 2 |