Paolo Cane
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emilio Sanchez | 2 | 4 | 6 | Jan 6, 1990 | H2H |
| Jakob Hlasek | 1 | 4 | 5 | May 15, 1991 | H2H |
| Diego Perez | 3 | 2 | 5 | Sep 27, 1990 | H2H |
| Magnus Gustafsson | 3 | 2 | 5 | Nov 9, 1989 | H2H |
| Martin Jaite | 0 | 5 | 5 | Aug 11, 1988 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC
Paolo Cane vs Daniel Orsanic H2H: 0-1
Daniel Orsanic holds a 1–0 lead over Paolo Cane in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Daniel Orsanic leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Daniel Orsanic won the 1993 San Marino round of 32 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel Orsanic | 6-4 6-1 | Paolo Cane | Match data | Aug 12, 1993* | R32 | San Marino | ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paolo Cane | #1,381 | #26 | 565 | 1,853 | 124 | 123 | 50.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Daniel Orsanic | #817 | #107 | 405 | 1,545 | 14 | 31 | 31.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Paolo Cane | Daniel Orsanic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1983 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1984 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #555 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1985 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #199 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1986 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #44 | 1,668 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1987 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #51 | 1,706 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #170 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1988 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #81 | 1,704 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #184 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1989 | 24–14 | 63.2% | #33 | 1,756 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #167 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1990 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #109 | 1,688 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #128 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1991 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #122 | 1,688 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #224 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1992 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #163 | 1,656 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #377 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1993 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #177 | 1,598 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #228 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1994 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #145 | 1,600 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #695 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #635 | 1,583 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #826 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Paolo Cane | Daniel Orsanic | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 18 | 1983 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1984 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1985 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1986 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 22 | 11 | 33 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1987 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 13 | 9 | 22 | 59.1% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1990 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1988 | 9 | 6 | 15 | 60.0% | 6 | 10 | 16 | 37.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1991 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 24 | 1989 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 18 | 6 | 24 | 75.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 1992 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1990 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 8 | 10 | 18 | 44.4% | — | — | — | — | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 1993 | — | — | — | — | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1991 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1994 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1992 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 1995 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1993 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1996 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1994 | — | — | — | — | 6 | 9 | 15 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1997 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1995 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 20 | 21 | 41 | 48.8% | 87 | 79 | 166 | 52.4% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 16 | 20 | 36 | 44.4% | — | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | 13 | 21 | 34 | 38.2% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
Performance Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 51/58 of Paolo Cane's and 36/43 of Daniel Orsanic's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Paolo Cane | Daniel Orsanic | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 23 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 8/9 | 2.3 | 2.8 | 58.1% | 64.1% | 47.1% | 52.2% | 49.1% | 57.3% | 37.0% |
| 24 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 2/2 | 0.5 | 3.5 | 56.0% | 62.6% | 36.6% | 58.3% | 50.0% | 51.2% | 31.4% |
| 25 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 13/15 | 1.3 | 2.2 | 63.1% | 62.4% | 44.8% | 57.7% | 50.0% | 55.9% | 42.3% |
| 26 | 1991 | 10/14 | 6.3 | 1.3 | 51.0% | 71.3% | 51.5% | 63.4% | 48.6% | 62.1% | 39.8% | 1994 | 10/13 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 59.7% | 59.4% | 47.4% | 58.0% | 71.3% | 54.3% | 37.1% |
| 27 | 1992 | 16/17 | 5.7 | 2.2 | 54.6% | 71.3% | 51.8% | 56.6% | 36.8% | 62.4% | 37.4% | 1995 | 1/1 | 2.0 | 5.0 | 51.7% | 64.5% | 41.4% | 75.0% | — | 53.3% | 27.5% |
| 28 | 1993 | 9/10 | 5.7 | 2.2 | 52.2% | 72.0% | 45.6% | 58.6% | 33.5% | 59.7% | 37.1% | 1996 | 1/2 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 68.7% | 67.4% | 42.9% | 62.5% | 50.0% | 59.7% | 25.5% |
| 29 | 1994 | 15/16 | 3.9 | 2.0 | 48.5% | 66.8% | 47.1% | 55.9% | 42.1% | 56.5% | 38.4% | 1997 | 1/1 | 0.0 | 7.0 | 45.8% | 63.0% | 40.6% | 50.0% | 20.0% | 50.8% | 27.5% |
| 30 | 1995 | 1/1 | 4.0 | 1.0 | 45.5% | 50.0% | 37.5% | 44.4% | — | 43.2% | 20.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 51/247 | 5.3 | 1.9 | 51.5% | 69.7% | 49.0% | 57.8% | 39.3% | 59.8% | 37.8% | — | 36/45 | 1.4 | 2.5 | 60.0% | 62.2% | 45.3% | 57.0% | 53.5% | 55.4% | 37.8% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Paolo Cane | Daniel Orsanic | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 18 | 1983 | 1482 | 102.2 | — | — | — | — | +62 | — | — | 30.8% | -1.61 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–0 | — | +0.46 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1984 | 1457 | 100.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.0% | -1.20 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1985 | 1451 | 106.2 | — | — | — | — | — | -2 | — | 35.3% | -0.76 | 0–2 | 0–1 | — | +0.43 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1986 | 1668 | 140.6 | — | — | — | — | -133 | +42 | — | 56.8% | +0.29 | 13–8 (62%) | 9–4 (69%) | — | +0.85 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1987 | 1706 | 138.9 | — | — | — | — | -92 | +43 | — | 51.0% | +0.05 | 8–4 (67%) | 6–7 (46%) | — | -0.47 | 1990 | 1494 | 106.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -0.67 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.12 |
| 23 | 1988 | 1705 | 131.4 | — | — | — | — | +2 | -25 | — | 45.7% | -0.26 | 5–6 (45%) | 8–9 (47%) | — | -0.73 | 1991 | 1459 | 103.1 | -2.75 | -1.38 | 0.866 | 47.4% | +52 | — | — | 23.8% | -1.38 | 1–1 | 0–2 | — | +0.53 |
| 24 | 1989 | 1756 | 138.8 | — | — | — | — | -79 | +94 | — | 57.8% | +0.27 | 9–1 (90%) | 9–5 (64%) | — | -0.63 | 1992 | 1445 | 100.9 | -2.09 | +0.25 | 0.643 | 42.6% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.80 | — | — | — | -0.13 |
| 25 | 1990 | 1689 | 130.4 | — | — | — | — | +19 | +67 | — | 48.6% | -0.24 | 7–3 (70%) | 5–4 (56%) | — | -0.16 | 1993 | 1500 | 117.2 | -2.00 | 0.00 | 0.959 | 49.4% | — | +66 | — | 41.9% | -0.39 | 1–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.33 |
| 26 | 1991 | 1689 | 122.0 | +0.78 | +0.31 | 1.049 | 51.3% | -42 | +118 | — | 55.9% | +0.38 | 2–2 (50%) | 3–2 (60%) | — | +0.45 | 1994 | 1511 | 107.0 | -2.93 | -0.91 | 0.812 | 46.3% | — | +51 | — | 41.9% | -0.71 | 1–2 (33%) | 2–1 (67%) | — | +0.69 |
| 27 | 1992 | 1657 | 119.9 | +0.98 | -1.30 | 0.996 | 49.7% | -14 | +70 | — | 45.2% | -0.12 | 2–3 (40%) | 2–5 (29%) | — | +0.12 | 1995 | 1496 | 95.0 | -0.23 | -4.01 | 0.588 | 41.4% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | +0.10 |
| 28 | 1993 | 1599 | 109.2 | -0.36 | -0.69 | 0.919 | 48.3% | +27 | +55 | — | 38.5% | -0.85 | 2–4 (33%) | 1–2 (33%) | — | +0.35 | 1996 | 1511 | 107.4 | -1.28 | +6.29 | 0.633 | 44.9% | — | — | — | 50.0% | +0.75 | — | — | — | -0.10 |
| 29 | 1994 | 1601 | 126.5 | -2.00 | -0.22 | 0.884 | 47.5% | — | +49 | — | 36.1% | -1.08 | 3–3 (50%) | 2–3 (40%) | — | -0.94 | 1997 | 1495 | 97.0 | -0.72 | -2.41 | 0.558 | 40.0% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | +0.03 |
| 30 | 1995 | 1583 | 93.4 | -0.27 | -2.52 | 0.352 | 32.9% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -5.50 | — | — | — | +0.09 | 1998 | 1493 | 110.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.67 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.26 |
| Career | — | 1854 | 137.8 | -0.20 | -0.58 | 0.939 | 48.8% | -32 | +51 | — | 49.0% | -0.14 | 52–39 (57%) | 46–43 (52%) | 106.8 | +0.04 | — | 1546 | 113.0 | -2.33 | -0.55 | 0.847 | 47.1% | +52 | +59 | — | 34.3% | -0.93 | 3–6 (33%) | 2–4 (33%) | 98.4 | +2.38 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Daniel Orsanic
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Luiz Mattar | 2 | 0 | 2 | Apr 14, 1994 | H2H |
| Horacio de la Pena | 0 | 2 | 2 | Oct 28, 1993 | H2H |
| Scott Davis | 0 | 2 | 2 | Oct 2, 1991 | H2H |
| Albert Costa | 0 | 1 | 1 | Jul 9, 1998 | H2H |
| Lucas Arnold Ker | 0 | 1 | 1 | Jul 23, 1997 | H2H |