H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Paolo Cane vs Diego Perez H2H: 3-2
Paolo Cane holds a 3–2 lead over Diego Perez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Paolo Cane leads 3–2 on clay. Most recently, Paolo Cane won the 1990 Palermo third round 3-6 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 61
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
3
–
2
5 main draw meetings
URU
Age 64
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 1990* | Palermo | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Paolo Cane | 3-6 6-4 6-2 | Diego Perez | Match data |
| Apr 12, 1990* | Barcelona | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Diego Perez | 6-2 2-0 (ret.) | Paolo Cane | Match data |
| Jul 14, 1988* | Bastad | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Paolo Cane | 6-1 6-4 | Diego Perez | Match data |
| May 19, 1988* | Florence | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Diego Perez | 7-5 6-7 6-3 | Paolo Cane | Match data |
| Jun 14, 1986* | Bologna | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Paolo Cane | 1-6 6-2 6-1 | Diego Perez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paolo Cane | #1,381 | #26 | 565 | 1,835 | 121 | 122 | 49.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Diego Perez | #1,373 | #27 | 389 | 1,830 | 195 | 213 | 47.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Paolo Cane | Diego Perez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #579 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1983 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #211 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1984 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #555 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #94 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1985 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #199 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #100 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1986 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #44 | 1,667 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #51 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1987 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #51 | 1,707 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #52 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1988 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #81 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #55 | 1,779 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1989 | 24–14 | 63.2% | #33 | 1,741 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #61 | 1,694 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1990 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #109 | 1,682 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #116 | 1,668 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1991 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #122 | 1,684 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #142 | 1,607 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1992 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #163 | 1,654 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #112 | 1,650 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1993 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #177 | 1,596 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #132 | 1,593 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1994 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #145 | 1,598 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #176 | 1,571 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #635 | 1,581 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #128 | 1,617 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 2–13 | 13.3% | #253 | 1,509 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #661 | 1,496 | 0 | 1 |